Cargando…

Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: The fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β(2)-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalberg, Chris, O’Dell, Dianne, Galkin, Dmitry, Newlands, Amy, Fahy, William A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27028749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2
_version_ 1782433159748517888
author Kalberg, Chris
O’Dell, Dianne
Galkin, Dmitry
Newlands, Amy
Fahy, William A.
author_facet Kalberg, Chris
O’Dell, Dianne
Galkin, Dmitry
Newlands, Amy
Fahy, William A.
author_sort Kalberg, Chris
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β(2)-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This 12-week, randomized, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study compared once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg + indacaterol (IND) 150 mcg in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. The primary endpoint was the trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) on day 85 (predefined non-inferiority margin −50 mL), and the secondary endpoint was the 0- to 6-h weighted mean (WM) FEV(1) on day 84. Other efficacy endpoints [including rescue medication use, the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score] and safety endpoints [adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and COPD exacerbations] were also assessed. RESULTS: Trough FEV(1) improvements were comparable between treatment groups [least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to day 85: UMEC/VI 172 mL; TIO + IND 171 mL; treatment difference 1 mL; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −29 to 30 mL], demonstrating non-inferiority between UMEC/VI and TIO + IND. The treatments produced similar improvements in the trough FEV(1) at other study visits and the 0- to 6-h WM FEV(1) (LS mean changes at day 84: UMEC/VI 235 mL; TIO + IND 258 mL; treatment difference −23 mL; 95 % CI −54 to 8 mL). The results for patient-reported measures (rescue medication use, TDI focal score, and SGRQ score) were comparable; both treatments produced clinically meaningful improvements in TDI and SGRQ scores. The incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations, and changes in vital signs were similar for the two treatments. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VI and TIO + IND, given once daily, provided similar improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes over 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with comparable tolerability and safety profiles. TRIAL NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov study ID NCT02257385; GSK study no. 116961. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4875926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48759262016-06-13 Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Kalberg, Chris O’Dell, Dianne Galkin, Dmitry Newlands, Amy Fahy, William A. Drugs R D Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β(2)-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This 12-week, randomized, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study compared once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg + indacaterol (IND) 150 mcg in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. The primary endpoint was the trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) on day 85 (predefined non-inferiority margin −50 mL), and the secondary endpoint was the 0- to 6-h weighted mean (WM) FEV(1) on day 84. Other efficacy endpoints [including rescue medication use, the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score] and safety endpoints [adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and COPD exacerbations] were also assessed. RESULTS: Trough FEV(1) improvements were comparable between treatment groups [least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to day 85: UMEC/VI 172 mL; TIO + IND 171 mL; treatment difference 1 mL; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −29 to 30 mL], demonstrating non-inferiority between UMEC/VI and TIO + IND. The treatments produced similar improvements in the trough FEV(1) at other study visits and the 0- to 6-h WM FEV(1) (LS mean changes at day 84: UMEC/VI 235 mL; TIO + IND 258 mL; treatment difference −23 mL; 95 % CI −54 to 8 mL). The results for patient-reported measures (rescue medication use, TDI focal score, and SGRQ score) were comparable; both treatments produced clinically meaningful improvements in TDI and SGRQ scores. The incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations, and changes in vital signs were similar for the two treatments. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VI and TIO + IND, given once daily, provided similar improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes over 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with comparable tolerability and safety profiles. TRIAL NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov study ID NCT02257385; GSK study no. 116961. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-30 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4875926/ /pubmed/27028749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kalberg, Chris
O’Dell, Dianne
Galkin, Dmitry
Newlands, Amy
Fahy, William A.
Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort dual bronchodilator therapy with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium plus indacaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27028749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kalbergchris dualbronchodilatortherapywithumeclidiniumvilanterolversustiotropiumplusindacaterolinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT odelldianne dualbronchodilatortherapywithumeclidiniumvilanterolversustiotropiumplusindacaterolinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT galkindmitry dualbronchodilatortherapywithumeclidiniumvilanterolversustiotropiumplusindacaterolinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT newlandsamy dualbronchodilatortherapywithumeclidiniumvilanterolversustiotropiumplusindacaterolinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fahywilliama dualbronchodilatortherapywithumeclidiniumvilanterolversustiotropiumplusindacaterolinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial