Cargando…

The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study

PURPOSE: Real-world data on the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are limited. Subsets of data from the Phase IV, non-interventional XAMOS study were analyzed to explore the potential influence of timing of the first thrombo prophylactic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas, Sylvia, Holberg, Gerlind, Kreutz, Reinhold, Lassen, Michael Rud, Mantovani, Lorenzo, Haupt, Verena, Vogtländer, Kai, Turpie, Alexander GG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274266
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S100293
_version_ 1782433181117448192
author Haas, Sylvia
Holberg, Gerlind
Kreutz, Reinhold
Lassen, Michael Rud
Mantovani, Lorenzo
Haupt, Verena
Vogtländer, Kai
Turpie, Alexander GG
author_facet Haas, Sylvia
Holberg, Gerlind
Kreutz, Reinhold
Lassen, Michael Rud
Mantovani, Lorenzo
Haupt, Verena
Vogtländer, Kai
Turpie, Alexander GG
author_sort Haas, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Real-world data on the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are limited. Subsets of data from the Phase IV, non-interventional XAMOS study were analyzed to explore the potential influence of timing of the first thrombo prophylactic dose, type of anesthesia, and concomitant mechanical prophylaxis on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In XAMOS, 8,778 patients received rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) and 8,635 received standard-of-care (SOC) pharmacological prophylaxis (safety population). Crude incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic and treatment-emergent bleeding events were analyzed according to timing of the first postoperative thromboprophylactic dose, use of general or neuraxial anesthesia, and use of mechanical prophylaxis with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS: In the rivaroxaban group, the incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic events were 0.7%, 1.0%, and 0.7% in patients receiving the first thromboprophylactic dose at ≤6 hours, >6 hours to ≤10 hours, and >10 hours to ≤24 hours after surgery, respectively. In the SOC group, the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events was slightly higher when the postoperative dose was given at >10 hours to ≤24 hours (1.8% vs 1.1% at ≤6 hours and 1.3% at >6 hours to ≤10 hours). The antithrombotic effect of rivaroxaban was maintained in comparison to the SOC group. The incidence of major bleeding (RECORD trial definition) was low and similar between the two treatment groups and was not influenced by timing of the first thromboprophylactic dose. Neuraxial anesthesia was used more than any other form of anesthesia for both hip and knee surgery; the effectiveness of rivaroxaban was not influenced by the type of anesthesia used. No spinal hematomas were reported in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia in either treatment group. Use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis in addition to rivaroxaban or SOC pharmacological prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of thromboembolic events further. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice were maintained irrespective of timing of the first postoperative dose within 24 hours after surgery, the type of anesthesia, and the additional use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4876074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48760742016-06-07 The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study Haas, Sylvia Holberg, Gerlind Kreutz, Reinhold Lassen, Michael Rud Mantovani, Lorenzo Haupt, Verena Vogtländer, Kai Turpie, Alexander GG Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Real-world data on the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are limited. Subsets of data from the Phase IV, non-interventional XAMOS study were analyzed to explore the potential influence of timing of the first thrombo prophylactic dose, type of anesthesia, and concomitant mechanical prophylaxis on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In XAMOS, 8,778 patients received rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) and 8,635 received standard-of-care (SOC) pharmacological prophylaxis (safety population). Crude incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic and treatment-emergent bleeding events were analyzed according to timing of the first postoperative thromboprophylactic dose, use of general or neuraxial anesthesia, and use of mechanical prophylaxis with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS: In the rivaroxaban group, the incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic events were 0.7%, 1.0%, and 0.7% in patients receiving the first thromboprophylactic dose at ≤6 hours, >6 hours to ≤10 hours, and >10 hours to ≤24 hours after surgery, respectively. In the SOC group, the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events was slightly higher when the postoperative dose was given at >10 hours to ≤24 hours (1.8% vs 1.1% at ≤6 hours and 1.3% at >6 hours to ≤10 hours). The antithrombotic effect of rivaroxaban was maintained in comparison to the SOC group. The incidence of major bleeding (RECORD trial definition) was low and similar between the two treatment groups and was not influenced by timing of the first thromboprophylactic dose. Neuraxial anesthesia was used more than any other form of anesthesia for both hip and knee surgery; the effectiveness of rivaroxaban was not influenced by the type of anesthesia used. No spinal hematomas were reported in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia in either treatment group. Use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis in addition to rivaroxaban or SOC pharmacological prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of thromboembolic events further. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice were maintained irrespective of timing of the first postoperative dose within 24 hours after surgery, the type of anesthesia, and the additional use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4876074/ /pubmed/27274266 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S100293 Text en © 2016 Haas et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haas, Sylvia
Holberg, Gerlind
Kreutz, Reinhold
Lassen, Michael Rud
Mantovani, Lorenzo
Haupt, Verena
Vogtländer, Kai
Turpie, Alexander GG
The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title_full The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title_fullStr The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title_short The effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the XAMOS study
title_sort effects of timing of prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and use of mechanical methods on outcome in major orthopedic surgery – subgroup analyses from 17,701 patients in the xamos study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274266
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S100293
work_keys_str_mv AT haassylvia theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT holberggerlind theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT kreutzreinhold theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT lassenmichaelrud theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT mantovanilorenzo theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT hauptverena theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT vogtlanderkai theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT turpiealexandergg theeffectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT haassylvia effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT holberggerlind effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT kreutzreinhold effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT lassenmichaelrud effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT mantovanilorenzo effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT hauptverena effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT vogtlanderkai effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy
AT turpiealexandergg effectsoftimingofprophylaxistypeofanesthesiaanduseofmechanicalmethodsonoutcomeinmajororthopedicsurgerysubgroupanalysesfrom17701patientsinthexamosstudy