Cargando…
Predominance of sperm motion in corners
Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669 |
_version_ | 1782433231607431168 |
---|---|
author | Nosrati, Reza Graham, Percival J. Liu, Qiaozhi Sinton, David |
author_facet | Nosrati, Reza Graham, Percival J. Liu, Qiaozhi Sinton, David |
author_sort | Nosrati, Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined geometries. Corner-swimming dominates with local areal concentrations as high as 200-fold that of the bulk. The relative degree of corner-swimming is strongest in small channels, decreases with increasing channel size, and plateaus for channels above 200 μm. Corner-swimming remains predominant across the physiologically-relevant range of viscosity and pH. Together, boundary-following sperm account for over 95% of the sperm distribution in small rectangular channels, which is similar to the percentage of wall swimmers in circular channels of similar size. We also demonstrate that wall-swimming sperm travel closer to walls in smaller channels (~100 μm), where the opposite wall is within the hydrodynamic interaction length-scale. The corner accumulation effect is more than the superposition of the influence of two walls, and over 5-fold stronger than that of a single wall. These findings suggest that folds and corners are dominant in sperm migration in the narrow (sub-mm) lumen of the fallopian tube and microchannel-based sperm selection devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4876399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48763992016-06-06 Predominance of sperm motion in corners Nosrati, Reza Graham, Percival J. Liu, Qiaozhi Sinton, David Sci Rep Article Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined geometries. Corner-swimming dominates with local areal concentrations as high as 200-fold that of the bulk. The relative degree of corner-swimming is strongest in small channels, decreases with increasing channel size, and plateaus for channels above 200 μm. Corner-swimming remains predominant across the physiologically-relevant range of viscosity and pH. Together, boundary-following sperm account for over 95% of the sperm distribution in small rectangular channels, which is similar to the percentage of wall swimmers in circular channels of similar size. We also demonstrate that wall-swimming sperm travel closer to walls in smaller channels (~100 μm), where the opposite wall is within the hydrodynamic interaction length-scale. The corner accumulation effect is more than the superposition of the influence of two walls, and over 5-fold stronger than that of a single wall. These findings suggest that folds and corners are dominant in sperm migration in the narrow (sub-mm) lumen of the fallopian tube and microchannel-based sperm selection devices. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4876399/ /pubmed/27211846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Nosrati, Reza Graham, Percival J. Liu, Qiaozhi Sinton, David Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title | Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title_full | Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title_fullStr | Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title_full_unstemmed | Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title_short | Predominance of sperm motion in corners |
title_sort | predominance of sperm motion in corners |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nosratireza predominanceofspermmotionincorners AT grahampercivalj predominanceofspermmotionincorners AT liuqiaozhi predominanceofspermmotionincorners AT sintondavid predominanceofspermmotionincorners |