Cargando…

Predominance of sperm motion in corners

Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nosrati, Reza, Graham, Percival J., Liu, Qiaozhi, Sinton, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669
_version_ 1782433231607431168
author Nosrati, Reza
Graham, Percival J.
Liu, Qiaozhi
Sinton, David
author_facet Nosrati, Reza
Graham, Percival J.
Liu, Qiaozhi
Sinton, David
author_sort Nosrati, Reza
collection PubMed
description Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined geometries. Corner-swimming dominates with local areal concentrations as high as 200-fold that of the bulk. The relative degree of corner-swimming is strongest in small channels, decreases with increasing channel size, and plateaus for channels above 200 μm. Corner-swimming remains predominant across the physiologically-relevant range of viscosity and pH. Together, boundary-following sperm account for over 95% of the sperm distribution in small rectangular channels, which is similar to the percentage of wall swimmers in circular channels of similar size. We also demonstrate that wall-swimming sperm travel closer to walls in smaller channels (~100 μm), where the opposite wall is within the hydrodynamic interaction length-scale. The corner accumulation effect is more than the superposition of the influence of two walls, and over 5-fold stronger than that of a single wall. These findings suggest that folds and corners are dominant in sperm migration in the narrow (sub-mm) lumen of the fallopian tube and microchannel-based sperm selection devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4876399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48763992016-06-06 Predominance of sperm motion in corners Nosrati, Reza Graham, Percival J. Liu, Qiaozhi Sinton, David Sci Rep Article Sperm migration through the female tract is crucial to fertilization, but the role of the complex and confined structure of the fallopian tube in sperm guidance remains unknown. Here, by confocal imaging microchannels head-on, we distinguish corner- vs. wall- vs. bulk-swimming bull sperm in confined geometries. Corner-swimming dominates with local areal concentrations as high as 200-fold that of the bulk. The relative degree of corner-swimming is strongest in small channels, decreases with increasing channel size, and plateaus for channels above 200 μm. Corner-swimming remains predominant across the physiologically-relevant range of viscosity and pH. Together, boundary-following sperm account for over 95% of the sperm distribution in small rectangular channels, which is similar to the percentage of wall swimmers in circular channels of similar size. We also demonstrate that wall-swimming sperm travel closer to walls in smaller channels (~100 μm), where the opposite wall is within the hydrodynamic interaction length-scale. The corner accumulation effect is more than the superposition of the influence of two walls, and over 5-fold stronger than that of a single wall. These findings suggest that folds and corners are dominant in sperm migration in the narrow (sub-mm) lumen of the fallopian tube and microchannel-based sperm selection devices. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4876399/ /pubmed/27211846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Nosrati, Reza
Graham, Percival J.
Liu, Qiaozhi
Sinton, David
Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title_full Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title_fullStr Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title_full_unstemmed Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title_short Predominance of sperm motion in corners
title_sort predominance of sperm motion in corners
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26669
work_keys_str_mv AT nosratireza predominanceofspermmotionincorners
AT grahampercivalj predominanceofspermmotionincorners
AT liuqiaozhi predominanceofspermmotionincorners
AT sintondavid predominanceofspermmotionincorners