Cargando…

Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review

Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hee, Siew Wan, Hamborg, Thomas, Day, Simon, Madan, Jason, Miller, Frank, Posch, Martin, Zohar, Sarah, Stallard, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245
_version_ 1782433235813269504
author Hee, Siew Wan
Hamborg, Thomas
Day, Simon
Madan, Jason
Miller, Frank
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Stallard, Nigel
author_facet Hee, Siew Wan
Hamborg, Thomas
Day, Simon
Madan, Jason
Miller, Frank
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Stallard, Nigel
author_sort Hee, Siew Wan
collection PubMed
description Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of summarizing current methodological developments in this area. We find that decision-theoretic methods have been applied to the design of small clinical trials in a number of areas. We divide our discussion of published methods into those for trials conducted in a single stage, those for multi-stage trials in which decisions are made through the course of the trial at a number of interim analyses, and those that attempt to design a series of clinical trials or a drug development programme. In all three cases, a number of methods have been proposed, depending on the decision maker’s perspective being considered and the details of utility functions that are used to construct the optimal design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4876428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48764282016-06-07 Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review Hee, Siew Wan Hamborg, Thomas Day, Simon Madan, Jason Miller, Frank Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Stallard, Nigel Stat Methods Med Res Articles Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of summarizing current methodological developments in this area. We find that decision-theoretic methods have been applied to the design of small clinical trials in a number of areas. We divide our discussion of published methods into those for trials conducted in a single stage, those for multi-stage trials in which decisions are made through the course of the trial at a number of interim analyses, and those that attempt to design a series of clinical trials or a drug development programme. In all three cases, a number of methods have been proposed, depending on the decision maker’s perspective being considered and the details of utility functions that are used to construct the optimal design. SAGE Publications 2015-06-05 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4876428/ /pubmed/26048902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Hee, Siew Wan
Hamborg, Thomas
Day, Simon
Madan, Jason
Miller, Frank
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Stallard, Nigel
Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title_full Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title_fullStr Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title_full_unstemmed Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title_short Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
title_sort decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: a review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245
work_keys_str_mv AT heesiewwan decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT hamborgthomas decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT daysimon decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT madanjason decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT millerfrank decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT poschmartin decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT zoharsarah decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview
AT stallardnigel decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview