Cargando…
Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review
Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245 |
_version_ | 1782433235813269504 |
---|---|
author | Hee, Siew Wan Hamborg, Thomas Day, Simon Madan, Jason Miller, Frank Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Stallard, Nigel |
author_facet | Hee, Siew Wan Hamborg, Thomas Day, Simon Madan, Jason Miller, Frank Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Stallard, Nigel |
author_sort | Hee, Siew Wan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of summarizing current methodological developments in this area. We find that decision-theoretic methods have been applied to the design of small clinical trials in a number of areas. We divide our discussion of published methods into those for trials conducted in a single stage, those for multi-stage trials in which decisions are made through the course of the trial at a number of interim analyses, and those that attempt to design a series of clinical trials or a drug development programme. In all three cases, a number of methods have been proposed, depending on the decision maker’s perspective being considered and the details of utility functions that are used to construct the optimal design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4876428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48764282016-06-07 Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review Hee, Siew Wan Hamborg, Thomas Day, Simon Madan, Jason Miller, Frank Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Stallard, Nigel Stat Methods Med Res Articles Pilot studies and other small clinical trials are often conducted but serve a variety of purposes and there is little consensus on their design. One paradigm that has been suggested for the design of such studies is Bayesian decision theory. In this article, we review the literature with the aim of summarizing current methodological developments in this area. We find that decision-theoretic methods have been applied to the design of small clinical trials in a number of areas. We divide our discussion of published methods into those for trials conducted in a single stage, those for multi-stage trials in which decisions are made through the course of the trial at a number of interim analyses, and those that attempt to design a series of clinical trials or a drug development programme. In all three cases, a number of methods have been proposed, depending on the decision maker’s perspective being considered and the details of utility functions that are used to construct the optimal design. SAGE Publications 2015-06-05 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4876428/ /pubmed/26048902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Hee, Siew Wan Hamborg, Thomas Day, Simon Madan, Jason Miller, Frank Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Stallard, Nigel Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title | Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title_full | Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title_fullStr | Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title_short | Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review |
title_sort | decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: a review |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heesiewwan decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT hamborgthomas decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT daysimon decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT madanjason decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT millerfrank decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT poschmartin decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT zoharsarah decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview AT stallardnigel decisiontheoreticdesignsforsmalltrialsandpilotstudiesareview |