Cargando…

A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure

BACKGROUND: COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Acute exacerbations of COPD may cause respiratory failure, requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation. Intensive care unit patients with acute exacerbations of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation have higher mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Suchi, Shi, Jindong, Fu, Cuiping, Wu, Xu, Li, Shanqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274223
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S99156
_version_ 1782433275476705280
author Chang, Suchi
Shi, Jindong
Fu, Cuiping
Wu, Xu
Li, Shanqun
author_facet Chang, Suchi
Shi, Jindong
Fu, Cuiping
Wu, Xu
Li, Shanqun
author_sort Chang, Suchi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Acute exacerbations of COPD may cause respiratory failure, requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation. Intensive care unit patients with acute exacerbations of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation have higher mortality rates than other hospitalized patients. Although mechanical ventilation is the most effective intervention for these conditions, invasive ventilation techniques have yielded variable effects. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) ventilation treatment efficacy and preventive effects on pulmonary barotrauma in elderly COPD patients with respiratory failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine intubated patients were divided into experimental and control groups and treated with the PRVC and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation – volume control methods, respectively. Vital signs, respiratory mechanics, and arterial blood gas analyses were monitored for 2–4 hours and 48 hours. RESULTS: Both groups showed rapidly improved pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)), and PaO(2) per fraction of inspired O(2) levels and lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) levels. The pH and PaCO(2) levels at 2–4 hours were lower and higher, respectively, in the test group than those in the control group (P<0.05 for both); after 48 hours, blood gas analyses showed no statistical difference in any marker (P>0.05). Vital signs during 2–4 hours and 48 hours of treatment showed no statistical difference in either group (P>0.05). The level of peak inspiratory pressure in the experimental group after mechanical ventilation for 2–4 hours and 48 hours was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), while other variables were not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Among elderly COPD patients with respiratory failure, application of PRVC resulted in rapid improvement in arterial blood gas analyses while maintaining a low peak inspiratory pressure. PRVC can reduce pulmonary barotrauma risk, making it a safer protective ventilation mode than synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation – volume control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4876677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48766772016-06-07 A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure Chang, Suchi Shi, Jindong Fu, Cuiping Wu, Xu Li, Shanqun Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Acute exacerbations of COPD may cause respiratory failure, requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation. Intensive care unit patients with acute exacerbations of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation have higher mortality rates than other hospitalized patients. Although mechanical ventilation is the most effective intervention for these conditions, invasive ventilation techniques have yielded variable effects. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) ventilation treatment efficacy and preventive effects on pulmonary barotrauma in elderly COPD patients with respiratory failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine intubated patients were divided into experimental and control groups and treated with the PRVC and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation – volume control methods, respectively. Vital signs, respiratory mechanics, and arterial blood gas analyses were monitored for 2–4 hours and 48 hours. RESULTS: Both groups showed rapidly improved pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)), and PaO(2) per fraction of inspired O(2) levels and lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) levels. The pH and PaCO(2) levels at 2–4 hours were lower and higher, respectively, in the test group than those in the control group (P<0.05 for both); after 48 hours, blood gas analyses showed no statistical difference in any marker (P>0.05). Vital signs during 2–4 hours and 48 hours of treatment showed no statistical difference in either group (P>0.05). The level of peak inspiratory pressure in the experimental group after mechanical ventilation for 2–4 hours and 48 hours was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), while other variables were not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Among elderly COPD patients with respiratory failure, application of PRVC resulted in rapid improvement in arterial blood gas analyses while maintaining a low peak inspiratory pressure. PRVC can reduce pulmonary barotrauma risk, making it a safer protective ventilation mode than synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation – volume control. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4876677/ /pubmed/27274223 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S99156 Text en © 2016 Chang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chang, Suchi
Shi, Jindong
Fu, Cuiping
Wu, Xu
Li, Shanqun
A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title_full A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title_fullStr A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title_short A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure
title_sort comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of copd and respiratory failure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274223
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S99156
work_keys_str_mv AT changsuchi acomparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT shijindong acomparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT fucuiping acomparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT wuxu acomparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT lishanqun acomparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT changsuchi comparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT shijindong comparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT fucuiping comparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT wuxu comparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure
AT lishanqun comparisonofsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationandpressureregulatedvolumecontrolventilationinelderlypatientswithacuteexacerbationsofcopdandrespiratoryfailure