Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of phacoemulsification through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation versus phacoemulsification through a well-dilated pupil. METHODS: This prospective randomized control (comparative) study comprised 78 patients (group I) with a maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papaconstantinou, Dimitris, Kalantzis, George, Brouzas, Dimitris, Kontaxakis, Anastasios, Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi, Diagourtas, Andreas, Georgalas, Ilias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S97254
_version_ 1782433275967438848
author Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Kalantzis, George
Brouzas, Dimitris
Kontaxakis, Anastasios
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Diagourtas, Andreas
Georgalas, Ilias
author_facet Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Kalantzis, George
Brouzas, Dimitris
Kontaxakis, Anastasios
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Diagourtas, Andreas
Georgalas, Ilias
author_sort Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of phacoemulsification through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation versus phacoemulsification through a well-dilated pupil. METHODS: This prospective randomized control (comparative) study comprised 78 patients (group I) with a maximally dilated pupil size of ≤4.00 mm and 45 patients (group II) with dilated pupil size of ≥7.00 mm. In group I patients, only viscodilation and minimal push-and-pull iris stretching with two collar-button iris-retractor hooks were utilized without iris manipulation. Phacoemulsification was performed by two senior surgeons and the technique used consisted of either stop and chop or quick chop, infusion/aspiration of lens cortex, capsular bag refill with ocular viscoelastic devices, and implantation of an acrylic foldable intraocular lens. Patients were examined on the first day and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of group I patients had pseudoexfoliation syndrome, eleven eyes had previous glaucoma surgery, 14 eyes had angle-closure or open-angle glaucoma, and seven eyes had posterior synechiae with iritis. In group I patients, the mean pupil size measured under an operating microscope was 3.2 mm preoperatively, 4.3 mm after viscoelastic and mechanical pupil dilation, and 4.1 mm at the end of a surgical procedure. Rupture of the zonular fibers occurred in six patients of group I and the intraocular lens was implanted in the sulcus. Small iris-sphincter rupture and small hemorrhages occurred in four eyes during pupillary manipulation, but they were not evident at the end of the surgery. In group II patients, no intraoperative complications occurred. Signs of significant corneal edema and iritis were observed more frequently in group I eyes (26 eyes and 20 eyes, respectively) on the first postoperative day in comparison with group II eyes (ten eyes and six eyes, respectively). Intraocular pressure was <20 mmHg in all eyes of both groups. One month postoperatively, the pupil was round and reactive to light, the anterior chamber was quiet, and the cornea was clear in all eyes. The best-corrected visual acuity on Snellen chart was 20/40 (Monoyer’s scale) or better in both groups. CONCLUSION: Phacoemulsification through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation can be safe and exhibits the same results as those obtained with phacoemulsification through normal pupils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4876679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48766792016-06-07 Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation Papaconstantinou, Dimitris Kalantzis, George Brouzas, Dimitris Kontaxakis, Anastasios Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Diagourtas, Andreas Georgalas, Ilias Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of phacoemulsification through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation versus phacoemulsification through a well-dilated pupil. METHODS: This prospective randomized control (comparative) study comprised 78 patients (group I) with a maximally dilated pupil size of ≤4.00 mm and 45 patients (group II) with dilated pupil size of ≥7.00 mm. In group I patients, only viscodilation and minimal push-and-pull iris stretching with two collar-button iris-retractor hooks were utilized without iris manipulation. Phacoemulsification was performed by two senior surgeons and the technique used consisted of either stop and chop or quick chop, infusion/aspiration of lens cortex, capsular bag refill with ocular viscoelastic devices, and implantation of an acrylic foldable intraocular lens. Patients were examined on the first day and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of group I patients had pseudoexfoliation syndrome, eleven eyes had previous glaucoma surgery, 14 eyes had angle-closure or open-angle glaucoma, and seven eyes had posterior synechiae with iritis. In group I patients, the mean pupil size measured under an operating microscope was 3.2 mm preoperatively, 4.3 mm after viscoelastic and mechanical pupil dilation, and 4.1 mm at the end of a surgical procedure. Rupture of the zonular fibers occurred in six patients of group I and the intraocular lens was implanted in the sulcus. Small iris-sphincter rupture and small hemorrhages occurred in four eyes during pupillary manipulation, but they were not evident at the end of the surgery. In group II patients, no intraoperative complications occurred. Signs of significant corneal edema and iritis were observed more frequently in group I eyes (26 eyes and 20 eyes, respectively) on the first postoperative day in comparison with group II eyes (ten eyes and six eyes, respectively). Intraocular pressure was <20 mmHg in all eyes of both groups. One month postoperatively, the pupil was round and reactive to light, the anterior chamber was quiet, and the cornea was clear in all eyes. The best-corrected visual acuity on Snellen chart was 20/40 (Monoyer’s scale) or better in both groups. CONCLUSION: Phacoemulsification through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation can be safe and exhibits the same results as those obtained with phacoemulsification through normal pupils. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4876679/ /pubmed/27274213 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S97254 Text en © 2016 Papaconstantinou et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
Kalantzis, George
Brouzas, Dimitris
Kontaxakis, Anastasios
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Diagourtas, Andreas
Georgalas, Ilias
Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title_full Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title_short Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
title_sort safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation through a small pupil using minimal iris manipulation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S97254
work_keys_str_mv AT papaconstantinoudimitris safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT kalantzisgeorge safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT brouzasdimitris safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT kontaxakisanastasios safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT koutsandreachryssanthi safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT diagourtasandreas safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation
AT georgalasilias safetyandefficacyofphacoemulsificationandintraocularlensimplantationthroughasmallpupilusingminimalirismanipulation