Cargando…
Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening
BACKGROUND: Screening could improve recognition of dementia in primary care. We sought to determine the effect of screening for dementia in primary care practices on the formal diagnosis rate; the distribution of differential diagnoses; and the factors associated with receiving a formal diagnosis. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.007 |
_version_ | 1782433301572616192 |
---|---|
author | Eichler, Tilly Thyrian, Jochen René Hertel, Johannes Michalowsky, Bernhard Wucherer, Diana Dreier, Adina Kilimann, Ingo Teipel, Stefan Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Eichler, Tilly Thyrian, Jochen René Hertel, Johannes Michalowsky, Bernhard Wucherer, Diana Dreier, Adina Kilimann, Ingo Teipel, Stefan Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Eichler, Tilly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening could improve recognition of dementia in primary care. We sought to determine the effect of screening for dementia in primary care practices on the formal diagnosis rate; the distribution of differential diagnoses; and the factors associated with receiving a formal diagnosis. METHODS: The “Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania” is an ongoing general practitioner (GP)-based, randomized, controlled intervention trial. A total of 4064 community dwelling patients (aged ≥70 years) were screened for dementia in 108 GP practices. Of these patients, 692 (17%) had positive screening results (DemTect score <9). Of these 692 patients, 406 (59%) provided informed consent. The analyses included the data from 243 patients with a complete baseline assessment (preliminary data; January 2014). RESULTS: Of 146 patients without a formal diagnosis of dementia, 72 (49%) received a formal diagnosis after a positive screening outcome (69% with “unspecified dementia”). Female sex was significantly associated with receiving a formal diagnosis (multivariate analyses). CONCLUSION: Screening improved the identification of dementia considerably. Because of the risk of receiving a false-positive diagnosis, additional diagnostic assessment should be mandatory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4876881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48768812016-05-27 Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening Eichler, Tilly Thyrian, Jochen René Hertel, Johannes Michalowsky, Bernhard Wucherer, Diana Dreier, Adina Kilimann, Ingo Teipel, Stefan Hoffmann, Wolfgang Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment BACKGROUND: Screening could improve recognition of dementia in primary care. We sought to determine the effect of screening for dementia in primary care practices on the formal diagnosis rate; the distribution of differential diagnoses; and the factors associated with receiving a formal diagnosis. METHODS: The “Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania” is an ongoing general practitioner (GP)-based, randomized, controlled intervention trial. A total of 4064 community dwelling patients (aged ≥70 years) were screened for dementia in 108 GP practices. Of these patients, 692 (17%) had positive screening results (DemTect score <9). Of these 692 patients, 406 (59%) provided informed consent. The analyses included the data from 243 patients with a complete baseline assessment (preliminary data; January 2014). RESULTS: Of 146 patients without a formal diagnosis of dementia, 72 (49%) received a formal diagnosis after a positive screening outcome (69% with “unspecified dementia”). Female sex was significantly associated with receiving a formal diagnosis (multivariate analyses). CONCLUSION: Screening improved the identification of dementia considerably. Because of the risk of receiving a false-positive diagnosis, additional diagnostic assessment should be mandatory. Elsevier 2015-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4876881/ /pubmed/27239495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.007 Text en © 2015 The Alzheimer’s Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment Eichler, Tilly Thyrian, Jochen René Hertel, Johannes Michalowsky, Bernhard Wucherer, Diana Dreier, Adina Kilimann, Ingo Teipel, Stefan Hoffmann, Wolfgang Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title | Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title_full | Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title_fullStr | Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title_short | Rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: The effect of screening |
title_sort | rates of formal diagnosis of dementia in primary care: the effect of screening |
topic | Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eichlertilly ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT thyrianjochenrene ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT herteljohannes ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT michalowskybernhard ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT wuchererdiana ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT dreieradina ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT kilimanningo ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT teipelstefan ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening AT hoffmannwolfgang ratesofformaldiagnosisofdementiainprimarycaretheeffectofscreening |