Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of (18)F-labeled amyloid imaging in Alzheimer's disease
BACKGROUND: Amyloid imaging using fluorine 18–labeled tracers florbetapir, florbetaben, and flutemetamol has recently been reported in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant studies published from January 1980 to March 2014. Studies compari...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.004 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Amyloid imaging using fluorine 18–labeled tracers florbetapir, florbetaben, and flutemetamol has recently been reported in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant studies published from January 1980 to March 2014. Studies comparing imaging findings in AD and normal controls (NCs) were pooled in a meta-analysis, calculating pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen studies, investigating 682 patients with AD, met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.6%, a specificity of 87.2%, and an OR of 91.7 for florbetapir in differentiating AD patients from NCs, and a sensitivity of 89.3%, a specificity of 87.6%, and a diagnostic OR of 69.9 for florbetaben. There were insufficient data to complete analyses for flutemetamol. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest favorable sensitivity and specificity of amyloid imaging with fluorine 18–labeled tracers in AD. Prospective studies are required to determine optimal imaging analysis methods and resolve outstanding clinical uncertainties. |
---|