Cargando…

Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem

Automated segmentation is a useful method for studying large brain structures such as the cerebellum and brainstem. However, automated segmentation may lead to inaccuracy and/or undesirable boundary. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether SegAdapter, a machine learning-based method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun Yi, Ngo, Michael M., Hessl, David, Hagerman, Randi J., Rivera, Susan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156123
_version_ 1782433323233050624
author Wang, Jun Yi
Ngo, Michael M.
Hessl, David
Hagerman, Randi J.
Rivera, Susan M.
author_facet Wang, Jun Yi
Ngo, Michael M.
Hessl, David
Hagerman, Randi J.
Rivera, Susan M.
author_sort Wang, Jun Yi
collection PubMed
description Automated segmentation is a useful method for studying large brain structures such as the cerebellum and brainstem. However, automated segmentation may lead to inaccuracy and/or undesirable boundary. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether SegAdapter, a machine learning-based method, is useful for automatically correcting large segmentation errors and disagreement in anatomical definition. We further assessed the robustness of the method in handling size of training set, differences in head coil usage, and amount of brain atrophy. High resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from 30 healthy controls scanned with either an 8-channel or 32-channel head coil. Ten patients, who suffered from brain atrophy because of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, were scanned using the 32-channel head coil. The initial segmentations of the cerebellum and brainstem were generated automatically using Freesurfer. Subsequently, Freesurfer’s segmentations were both manually corrected to serve as the gold standard and automatically corrected by SegAdapter. Using only 5 scans in the training set, spatial overlap with manual segmentation in Dice coefficient improved significantly from 0.956 (for Freesurfer segmentation) to 0.978 (for SegAdapter-corrected segmentation) for the cerebellum and from 0.821 to 0.954 for the brainstem. Reducing the training set size to 2 scans only decreased the Dice coefficient ≤0.002 for the cerebellum and ≤ 0.005 for the brainstem compared to the use of training set size of 5 scans in corrective learning. The method was also robust in handling differences between the training set and the test set in head coil usage and the amount of brain atrophy, which reduced spatial overlap only by <0.01. These results suggest that the combination of automated segmentation and corrective learning provides a valuable method for accurate and efficient segmentation of the cerebellum and brainstem, particularly in large-scale neuroimaging studies, and potentially for segmenting other neural regions as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4877064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48770642016-06-09 Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem Wang, Jun Yi Ngo, Michael M. Hessl, David Hagerman, Randi J. Rivera, Susan M. PLoS One Research Article Automated segmentation is a useful method for studying large brain structures such as the cerebellum and brainstem. However, automated segmentation may lead to inaccuracy and/or undesirable boundary. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether SegAdapter, a machine learning-based method, is useful for automatically correcting large segmentation errors and disagreement in anatomical definition. We further assessed the robustness of the method in handling size of training set, differences in head coil usage, and amount of brain atrophy. High resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from 30 healthy controls scanned with either an 8-channel or 32-channel head coil. Ten patients, who suffered from brain atrophy because of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, were scanned using the 32-channel head coil. The initial segmentations of the cerebellum and brainstem were generated automatically using Freesurfer. Subsequently, Freesurfer’s segmentations were both manually corrected to serve as the gold standard and automatically corrected by SegAdapter. Using only 5 scans in the training set, spatial overlap with manual segmentation in Dice coefficient improved significantly from 0.956 (for Freesurfer segmentation) to 0.978 (for SegAdapter-corrected segmentation) for the cerebellum and from 0.821 to 0.954 for the brainstem. Reducing the training set size to 2 scans only decreased the Dice coefficient ≤0.002 for the cerebellum and ≤ 0.005 for the brainstem compared to the use of training set size of 5 scans in corrective learning. The method was also robust in handling differences between the training set and the test set in head coil usage and the amount of brain atrophy, which reduced spatial overlap only by <0.01. These results suggest that the combination of automated segmentation and corrective learning provides a valuable method for accurate and efficient segmentation of the cerebellum and brainstem, particularly in large-scale neuroimaging studies, and potentially for segmenting other neural regions as well. Public Library of Science 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4877064/ /pubmed/27213683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156123 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Jun Yi
Ngo, Michael M.
Hessl, David
Hagerman, Randi J.
Rivera, Susan M.
Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title_full Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title_fullStr Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title_full_unstemmed Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title_short Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem
title_sort robust machine learning-based correction on automatic segmentation of the cerebellum and brainstem
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156123
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjunyi robustmachinelearningbasedcorrectiononautomaticsegmentationofthecerebellumandbrainstem
AT ngomichaelm robustmachinelearningbasedcorrectiononautomaticsegmentationofthecerebellumandbrainstem
AT hessldavid robustmachinelearningbasedcorrectiononautomaticsegmentationofthecerebellumandbrainstem
AT hagermanrandij robustmachinelearningbasedcorrectiononautomaticsegmentationofthecerebellumandbrainstem
AT riverasusanm robustmachinelearningbasedcorrectiononautomaticsegmentationofthecerebellumandbrainstem