Cargando…

Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates

Ecological theory and biodiversity conservation have traditionally relied on the number of species recorded at a site, but it is agreed that site richness represents only a portion of the species that can inhabit particular ecological conditions, that is, the habitat‐specific species pool. Knowledge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bello, Francesco, Fibich, Pavel, Zelený, David, Kopecký, Martin, Mudrák, Ondřej, Chytrý, Milan, Pyšek, Petr, Wild, Jan, Michalcová, Dana, Sádlo, Jiří, Šmilauer, Petr, Lepš, Jan, Pärtel, Meelis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2169
_version_ 1782433358743076864
author de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Zelený, David
Kopecký, Martin
Mudrák, Ondřej
Chytrý, Milan
Pyšek, Petr
Wild, Jan
Michalcová, Dana
Sádlo, Jiří
Šmilauer, Petr
Lepš, Jan
Pärtel, Meelis
author_facet de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Zelený, David
Kopecký, Martin
Mudrák, Ondřej
Chytrý, Milan
Pyšek, Petr
Wild, Jan
Michalcová, Dana
Sádlo, Jiří
Šmilauer, Petr
Lepš, Jan
Pärtel, Meelis
author_sort de Bello, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Ecological theory and biodiversity conservation have traditionally relied on the number of species recorded at a site, but it is agreed that site richness represents only a portion of the species that can inhabit particular ecological conditions, that is, the habitat‐specific species pool. Knowledge of the species pool at different sites enables meaningful comparisons of biodiversity and provides insights into processes of biodiversity formation. Empirical studies, however, are limited due to conceptual and methodological difficulties in determining both the size and composition of the absent part of species pools, the so‐called dark diversity. We used >50,000 vegetation plots from 18 types of habitats throughout the Czech Republic, most of which served as a training dataset and 1083 as a subset of test sites. These data were used to compare predicted results from three quantitative methods with those of previously published expert estimates based on species habitat preferences: (1) species co‐occurrence based on Beals' smoothing approach; (2) species ecological requirements, with envelopes around community mean Ellenberg values; and (3) species distribution models, using species environmental niches modeled by Biomod software. Dark diversity estimates were compared at both plot and habitat levels, and each method was applied in different configurations. While there were some differences in the results obtained by different methods, particularly at the plot level, there was a clear convergence, especially at the habitat level. The better convergence at the habitat level reflects less variation in local environmental conditions, whereas variation at the plot level is an effect of each particular method. The co‐occurrence agreed closest the expert estimate, followed by the method based on species ecological requirements. We conclude that several analytical methods can estimate species pools of given habitats. However, the strengths and weaknesses of different methods need attention, especially when dark diversity is estimated at the plot level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4877358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48773582016-08-11 Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates de Bello, Francesco Fibich, Pavel Zelený, David Kopecký, Martin Mudrák, Ondřej Chytrý, Milan Pyšek, Petr Wild, Jan Michalcová, Dana Sádlo, Jiří Šmilauer, Petr Lepš, Jan Pärtel, Meelis Ecol Evol Original Research Ecological theory and biodiversity conservation have traditionally relied on the number of species recorded at a site, but it is agreed that site richness represents only a portion of the species that can inhabit particular ecological conditions, that is, the habitat‐specific species pool. Knowledge of the species pool at different sites enables meaningful comparisons of biodiversity and provides insights into processes of biodiversity formation. Empirical studies, however, are limited due to conceptual and methodological difficulties in determining both the size and composition of the absent part of species pools, the so‐called dark diversity. We used >50,000 vegetation plots from 18 types of habitats throughout the Czech Republic, most of which served as a training dataset and 1083 as a subset of test sites. These data were used to compare predicted results from three quantitative methods with those of previously published expert estimates based on species habitat preferences: (1) species co‐occurrence based on Beals' smoothing approach; (2) species ecological requirements, with envelopes around community mean Ellenberg values; and (3) species distribution models, using species environmental niches modeled by Biomod software. Dark diversity estimates were compared at both plot and habitat levels, and each method was applied in different configurations. While there were some differences in the results obtained by different methods, particularly at the plot level, there was a clear convergence, especially at the habitat level. The better convergence at the habitat level reflects less variation in local environmental conditions, whereas variation at the plot level is an effect of each particular method. The co‐occurrence agreed closest the expert estimate, followed by the method based on species ecological requirements. We conclude that several analytical methods can estimate species pools of given habitats. However, the strengths and weaknesses of different methods need attention, especially when dark diversity is estimated at the plot level. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4877358/ /pubmed/27516866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2169 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Zelený, David
Kopecký, Martin
Mudrák, Ondřej
Chytrý, Milan
Pyšek, Petr
Wild, Jan
Michalcová, Dana
Sádlo, Jiří
Šmilauer, Petr
Lepš, Jan
Pärtel, Meelis
Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title_full Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title_fullStr Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title_full_unstemmed Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title_short Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
title_sort measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2169
work_keys_str_mv AT debellofrancesco measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT fibichpavel measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT zelenydavid measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT kopeckymartin measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT mudrakondrej measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT chytrymilan measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT pysekpetr measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT wildjan measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT michalcovadana measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT sadlojiri measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT smilauerpetr measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT lepsjan measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates
AT partelmeelis measuringsizeandcompositionofspeciespoolsacomparisonofdarkdiversityestimates