Cargando…
Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745 |
_version_ | 1782433360388292608 |
---|---|
author | McMahon, Catherine M. Boisvert, Isabelle de Lissa, Peter Granger, Louise Ibrahim, Ronny Lo, Chi Yhun Miles, Kelly Graham, Petra L. |
author_facet | McMahon, Catherine M. Boisvert, Isabelle de Lissa, Peter Granger, Louise Ibrahim, Ronny Lo, Chi Yhun Miles, Kelly Graham, Petra L. |
author_sort | McMahon, Catherine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear whether they assess the same cognitive processes involved, or other sensory and/or neurophysiological mechanisms that are associated with the task. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare alpha power and pupil dilation during a sentence recognition task in 15 randomized levels of noise (-7 to +7 dB SNR) using highly intelligible (16 channel vocoded) and moderately intelligible (6 channel vocoded) speech. Twenty young normal-hearing adults participated in the study, however, due to extraneous noise, data from only 16 (10 females, 6 males; aged 19–28 years) was used in the Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and 10 in the pupil analysis. Behavioral testing of perceived effort and speech performance was assessed at 3 fixed SNRs per participant and was comparable to sentence recognition performance assessed in the physiological test session for both 16- and 6-channel vocoded sentences. Results showed a significant interaction between channel vocoding for both the alpha power and the pupil size changes. While both measures significantly decreased with more positive SNRs for the 16-channel vocoding, this was not observed with the 6-channel vocoding. The results of this study suggest that these measures may encode different processes involved in speech perception, which show similar trends for highly intelligible speech, but diverge for more spectrally degraded speech. The results to date suggest that these objective correlates of listening effort, and the cognitive processes involved in listening effort, are not yet sufficiently well understood to be used within a clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4877370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48773702016-06-01 Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function McMahon, Catherine M. Boisvert, Isabelle de Lissa, Peter Granger, Louise Ibrahim, Ronny Lo, Chi Yhun Miles, Kelly Graham, Petra L. Front Psychol Psychology Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear whether they assess the same cognitive processes involved, or other sensory and/or neurophysiological mechanisms that are associated with the task. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare alpha power and pupil dilation during a sentence recognition task in 15 randomized levels of noise (-7 to +7 dB SNR) using highly intelligible (16 channel vocoded) and moderately intelligible (6 channel vocoded) speech. Twenty young normal-hearing adults participated in the study, however, due to extraneous noise, data from only 16 (10 females, 6 males; aged 19–28 years) was used in the Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and 10 in the pupil analysis. Behavioral testing of perceived effort and speech performance was assessed at 3 fixed SNRs per participant and was comparable to sentence recognition performance assessed in the physiological test session for both 16- and 6-channel vocoded sentences. Results showed a significant interaction between channel vocoding for both the alpha power and the pupil size changes. While both measures significantly decreased with more positive SNRs for the 16-channel vocoding, this was not observed with the 6-channel vocoding. The results of this study suggest that these measures may encode different processes involved in speech perception, which show similar trends for highly intelligible speech, but diverge for more spectrally degraded speech. The results to date suggest that these objective correlates of listening effort, and the cognitive processes involved in listening effort, are not yet sufficiently well understood to be used within a clinical setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4877370/ /pubmed/27252671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745 Text en Copyright © 2016 McMahon, Boisvert, de Lissa, Granger, Ibrahim, Lo, Miles and Graham. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology McMahon, Catherine M. Boisvert, Isabelle de Lissa, Peter Granger, Louise Ibrahim, Ronny Lo, Chi Yhun Miles, Kelly Graham, Petra L. Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title | Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title_full | Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title_fullStr | Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title_short | Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function |
title_sort | monitoring alpha oscillations and pupil dilation across a performance-intensity function |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmahoncatherinem monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT boisvertisabelle monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT delissapeter monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT grangerlouise monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT ibrahimronny monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT lochiyhun monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT mileskelly monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction AT grahampetral monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction |