Cargando…

Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function

Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMahon, Catherine M., Boisvert, Isabelle, de Lissa, Peter, Granger, Louise, Ibrahim, Ronny, Lo, Chi Yhun, Miles, Kelly, Graham, Petra L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745
_version_ 1782433360388292608
author McMahon, Catherine M.
Boisvert, Isabelle
de Lissa, Peter
Granger, Louise
Ibrahim, Ronny
Lo, Chi Yhun
Miles, Kelly
Graham, Petra L.
author_facet McMahon, Catherine M.
Boisvert, Isabelle
de Lissa, Peter
Granger, Louise
Ibrahim, Ronny
Lo, Chi Yhun
Miles, Kelly
Graham, Petra L.
author_sort McMahon, Catherine M.
collection PubMed
description Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear whether they assess the same cognitive processes involved, or other sensory and/or neurophysiological mechanisms that are associated with the task. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare alpha power and pupil dilation during a sentence recognition task in 15 randomized levels of noise (-7 to +7 dB SNR) using highly intelligible (16 channel vocoded) and moderately intelligible (6 channel vocoded) speech. Twenty young normal-hearing adults participated in the study, however, due to extraneous noise, data from only 16 (10 females, 6 males; aged 19–28 years) was used in the Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and 10 in the pupil analysis. Behavioral testing of perceived effort and speech performance was assessed at 3 fixed SNRs per participant and was comparable to sentence recognition performance assessed in the physiological test session for both 16- and 6-channel vocoded sentences. Results showed a significant interaction between channel vocoding for both the alpha power and the pupil size changes. While both measures significantly decreased with more positive SNRs for the 16-channel vocoding, this was not observed with the 6-channel vocoding. The results of this study suggest that these measures may encode different processes involved in speech perception, which show similar trends for highly intelligible speech, but diverge for more spectrally degraded speech. The results to date suggest that these objective correlates of listening effort, and the cognitive processes involved in listening effort, are not yet sufficiently well understood to be used within a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4877370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48773702016-06-01 Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function McMahon, Catherine M. Boisvert, Isabelle de Lissa, Peter Granger, Louise Ibrahim, Ronny Lo, Chi Yhun Miles, Kelly Graham, Petra L. Front Psychol Psychology Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8–12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear whether they assess the same cognitive processes involved, or other sensory and/or neurophysiological mechanisms that are associated with the task. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare alpha power and pupil dilation during a sentence recognition task in 15 randomized levels of noise (-7 to +7 dB SNR) using highly intelligible (16 channel vocoded) and moderately intelligible (6 channel vocoded) speech. Twenty young normal-hearing adults participated in the study, however, due to extraneous noise, data from only 16 (10 females, 6 males; aged 19–28 years) was used in the Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and 10 in the pupil analysis. Behavioral testing of perceived effort and speech performance was assessed at 3 fixed SNRs per participant and was comparable to sentence recognition performance assessed in the physiological test session for both 16- and 6-channel vocoded sentences. Results showed a significant interaction between channel vocoding for both the alpha power and the pupil size changes. While both measures significantly decreased with more positive SNRs for the 16-channel vocoding, this was not observed with the 6-channel vocoding. The results of this study suggest that these measures may encode different processes involved in speech perception, which show similar trends for highly intelligible speech, but diverge for more spectrally degraded speech. The results to date suggest that these objective correlates of listening effort, and the cognitive processes involved in listening effort, are not yet sufficiently well understood to be used within a clinical setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4877370/ /pubmed/27252671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745 Text en Copyright © 2016 McMahon, Boisvert, de Lissa, Granger, Ibrahim, Lo, Miles and Graham. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
McMahon, Catherine M.
Boisvert, Isabelle
de Lissa, Peter
Granger, Louise
Ibrahim, Ronny
Lo, Chi Yhun
Miles, Kelly
Graham, Petra L.
Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title_full Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title_fullStr Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title_short Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function
title_sort monitoring alpha oscillations and pupil dilation across a performance-intensity function
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahoncatherinem monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT boisvertisabelle monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT delissapeter monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT grangerlouise monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT ibrahimronny monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT lochiyhun monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT mileskelly monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction
AT grahampetral monitoringalphaoscillationsandpupildilationacrossaperformanceintensityfunction