Cargando…

Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report

Background: Prior cognitive research in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has focused on automatic responses to negative affective stimuli, including attentional facilitation or disengagement and avoidance action tendencies. More recent research suggests PTSD may also relate to differences in rew...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clausen, Ashley N., Youngren, Westley, Sisante, Jason-Flor V., Billinger, Sandra A., Taylor, Charles, Aupperle, Robin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00758
_version_ 1782433363316965376
author Clausen, Ashley N.
Youngren, Westley
Sisante, Jason-Flor V.
Billinger, Sandra A.
Taylor, Charles
Aupperle, Robin L.
author_facet Clausen, Ashley N.
Youngren, Westley
Sisante, Jason-Flor V.
Billinger, Sandra A.
Taylor, Charles
Aupperle, Robin L.
author_sort Clausen, Ashley N.
collection PubMed
description Background: Prior cognitive research in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has focused on automatic responses to negative affective stimuli, including attentional facilitation or disengagement and avoidance action tendencies. More recent research suggests PTSD may also relate to differences in reward processing, which has lead to theories of PTSD relating to approach-avoidance imbalances. The current pilot study assessed how combat-PTSD symptoms relate to automatic behavioral tendencies to both positive and negative affective stimuli. Method: Twenty male combat veterans completed the approach-avoidance task (AAT), Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-II. During the AAT, subjects pulled (approach) or pushed (avoid) a joystick in response to neutral, happy, disgust, and angry faces based on border color. Bias scores were calculated for each emotion type (avoid-approach response latency differences). Main and interaction effects for psychological symptom severity and emotion type on bias score were assessed using linear mixed models. Results: There was a significant interaction between PTSD symptoms and emotion type, driven primarily by worse symptoms relating to a greater bias to avoid happy faces. Post hoc tests revealed that veterans with worse PTSD symptoms were slower to approach as well as quicker to avoid happy faces. Neither depressive nor anger symptoms related to avoid or approach tendencies of emotional stimuli. Conclusion: Posttraumatic stress disorder severity was associated with a bias for avoiding positive affective stimuli. These results provide further evidence that PTSD may relate to aberrant processing of positively valenced, or rewarding stimuli. Implicit responses to rewarding stimuli could be an important factor in PTSD pathology and treatment. Specifically, these findings have implications for recent endeavors in using computer-based interventions to influence automatic approach-avoidance tendencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4877383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48773832016-06-01 Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report Clausen, Ashley N. Youngren, Westley Sisante, Jason-Flor V. Billinger, Sandra A. Taylor, Charles Aupperle, Robin L. Front Psychol Psychology Background: Prior cognitive research in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has focused on automatic responses to negative affective stimuli, including attentional facilitation or disengagement and avoidance action tendencies. More recent research suggests PTSD may also relate to differences in reward processing, which has lead to theories of PTSD relating to approach-avoidance imbalances. The current pilot study assessed how combat-PTSD symptoms relate to automatic behavioral tendencies to both positive and negative affective stimuli. Method: Twenty male combat veterans completed the approach-avoidance task (AAT), Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-II. During the AAT, subjects pulled (approach) or pushed (avoid) a joystick in response to neutral, happy, disgust, and angry faces based on border color. Bias scores were calculated for each emotion type (avoid-approach response latency differences). Main and interaction effects for psychological symptom severity and emotion type on bias score were assessed using linear mixed models. Results: There was a significant interaction between PTSD symptoms and emotion type, driven primarily by worse symptoms relating to a greater bias to avoid happy faces. Post hoc tests revealed that veterans with worse PTSD symptoms were slower to approach as well as quicker to avoid happy faces. Neither depressive nor anger symptoms related to avoid or approach tendencies of emotional stimuli. Conclusion: Posttraumatic stress disorder severity was associated with a bias for avoiding positive affective stimuli. These results provide further evidence that PTSD may relate to aberrant processing of positively valenced, or rewarding stimuli. Implicit responses to rewarding stimuli could be an important factor in PTSD pathology and treatment. Specifically, these findings have implications for recent endeavors in using computer-based interventions to influence automatic approach-avoidance tendencies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4877383/ /pubmed/27252673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00758 Text en Copyright © 2016 Clausen, Youngren, Sisante, Billinger, Taylor and Aupperle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Clausen, Ashley N.
Youngren, Westley
Sisante, Jason-Flor V.
Billinger, Sandra A.
Taylor, Charles
Aupperle, Robin L.
Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title_full Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title_fullStr Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title_full_unstemmed Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title_short Combat PTSD and Implicit Behavioral Tendencies for Positive Affective Stimuli: A Brief Report
title_sort combat ptsd and implicit behavioral tendencies for positive affective stimuli: a brief report
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00758
work_keys_str_mv AT clausenashleyn combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport
AT youngrenwestley combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport
AT sisantejasonflorv combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport
AT billingersandraa combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport
AT taylorcharles combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport
AT aupperlerobinl combatptsdandimplicitbehavioraltendenciesforpositiveaffectivestimuliabriefreport