Cargando…

Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage

OBJECTIVE: Although trunk muscles in the lumbar spine preserve spinal stability and motility, little is known about the relationship between trunk muscles and spinal fusion rate. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the correlation between trunk muscles cross sectional area (MCSA) and fusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Man Kyu, Kim, Sung Bum, Park, Bong Jin, Park, Chang Kyu, Kim, Sung Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27226860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.276
_version_ 1782433399230693376
author Choi, Man Kyu
Kim, Sung Bum
Park, Bong Jin
Park, Chang Kyu
Kim, Sung Min
author_facet Choi, Man Kyu
Kim, Sung Bum
Park, Bong Jin
Park, Chang Kyu
Kim, Sung Min
author_sort Choi, Man Kyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although trunk muscles in the lumbar spine preserve spinal stability and motility, little is known about the relationship between trunk muscles and spinal fusion rate. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the correlation between trunk muscles cross sectional area (MCSA) and fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using stand-alone cages. METHODS: A total of 89 adult patients with degenerative lumbar disease who were performed PLIF using stand-alone cages at L4–5 were included in this study. The cross-sectional area of the psoas major (PS), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF) muscles were quantitatively evaluated by preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at the L3–4, L4–5, and L5–S1 segments, and bone union was evaluated by dynamic lumbar X-rays. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 68 had bone union and 21 did not. The MCSAs at all segments in both groups were significantly different (p<0.05) for the PS muscle, those at L3–4 and L4–5 segments between groups were significantly different (p=0.048, 0.021) for the ES and MF muscles. In the multivariate analysis, differences in the PS MCSA at the L4–5 and L5–S1 segments remained significant (p=0.048, 0.043 and odds ratio=1.098, 1.169). In comparison analysis between male and female patients, most MCSAs of male patients were larger than female's. Fusion rates of male patients (80.7%) were higher than female's (68.8%), too. CONCLUSION: For PLIF surgery, PS muscle function appears to be an important factor for bone union and preventing back muscle injury is essential for better fusion rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4877551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48775512016-05-25 Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage Choi, Man Kyu Kim, Sung Bum Park, Bong Jin Park, Chang Kyu Kim, Sung Min J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Although trunk muscles in the lumbar spine preserve spinal stability and motility, little is known about the relationship between trunk muscles and spinal fusion rate. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the correlation between trunk muscles cross sectional area (MCSA) and fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using stand-alone cages. METHODS: A total of 89 adult patients with degenerative lumbar disease who were performed PLIF using stand-alone cages at L4–5 were included in this study. The cross-sectional area of the psoas major (PS), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF) muscles were quantitatively evaluated by preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at the L3–4, L4–5, and L5–S1 segments, and bone union was evaluated by dynamic lumbar X-rays. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 68 had bone union and 21 did not. The MCSAs at all segments in both groups were significantly different (p<0.05) for the PS muscle, those at L3–4 and L4–5 segments between groups were significantly different (p=0.048, 0.021) for the ES and MF muscles. In the multivariate analysis, differences in the PS MCSA at the L4–5 and L5–S1 segments remained significant (p=0.048, 0.043 and odds ratio=1.098, 1.169). In comparison analysis between male and female patients, most MCSAs of male patients were larger than female's. Fusion rates of male patients (80.7%) were higher than female's (68.8%), too. CONCLUSION: For PLIF surgery, PS muscle function appears to be an important factor for bone union and preventing back muscle injury is essential for better fusion rate. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016-05 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4877551/ /pubmed/27226860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.276 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Choi, Man Kyu
Kim, Sung Bum
Park, Bong Jin
Park, Chang Kyu
Kim, Sung Min
Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title_full Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title_fullStr Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title_full_unstemmed Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title_short Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage
title_sort do trunk muscles affect the lumbar interbody fusion rate?: correlation of trunk muscle cross sectional area and fusion rates after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using stand-alone cage
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27226860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.276
work_keys_str_mv AT choimankyu dotrunkmusclesaffectthelumbarinterbodyfusionratecorrelationoftrunkmusclecrosssectionalareaandfusionratesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingstandalonecage
AT kimsungbum dotrunkmusclesaffectthelumbarinterbodyfusionratecorrelationoftrunkmusclecrosssectionalareaandfusionratesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingstandalonecage
AT parkbongjin dotrunkmusclesaffectthelumbarinterbodyfusionratecorrelationoftrunkmusclecrosssectionalareaandfusionratesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingstandalonecage
AT parkchangkyu dotrunkmusclesaffectthelumbarinterbodyfusionratecorrelationoftrunkmusclecrosssectionalareaandfusionratesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingstandalonecage
AT kimsungmin dotrunkmusclesaffectthelumbarinterbodyfusionratecorrelationoftrunkmusclecrosssectionalareaandfusionratesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingstandalonecage