Cargando…
Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze whether Cochrane plain language summaries (PLSs) adhere to the Standards for the reporting of Plain Language Summaries in new Cochrane Intervention Reviews (PLEACS). METHODS: A systematic analysis of adherence to the measurable PLEACS items was perfor...
Autores principales: | Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, Fidahic, Mahir, Vujcic, Milan, Saric, Frano, Propadalo, Ivana, Marelja, Ivana, Dosenovic, Svjetlana, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27216616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0162-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Banić, Aleksandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Framing the numerical findings of Cochrane plain language summaries: two randomized controlled trials
por: Buljan, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)