Cargando…
Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and medium-term outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2013, 21 patients underwent robotic-assisted cardiac surgery. The procedures performed were: mitral valve repair, mitral valve repla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082013000300007 |
_version_ | 1782433580119490560 |
---|---|
author | Poffo, Robinson Toschi, Alisson Parrilha Pope, Renato Bastos Celullare, Alex Luiz Benício, Anderson Fischer, Claudio Henrique Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos Teruya, Alexandre Hatanaka, Dina Mie Rusca, Gabriel Franzin Makdisse, Marcia |
author_facet | Poffo, Robinson Toschi, Alisson Parrilha Pope, Renato Bastos Celullare, Alex Luiz Benício, Anderson Fischer, Claudio Henrique Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos Teruya, Alexandre Hatanaka, Dina Mie Rusca, Gabriel Franzin Makdisse, Marcia |
author_sort | Poffo, Robinson |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and medium-term outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2013, 21 patients underwent robotic-assisted cardiac surgery. The procedures performed were: mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement, surgical correction of atrial fibrillation, surgical correction of atrial septal defect, intracardiac tumor resection, totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery and pericardiectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.39±18.05 years. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 151.7±99.97 minutes, and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 109.94±81.34 minutes. The mean duration of intubation was 7.52±15.2 hours, and 16 (76.2%) patients were extubated in the operating room immediately after the procedure. The mean length of intensive care unit stay was 1.67±1.46 days. There were no conversions to sternotomy. There was no in-hospital death or deaths during the medium-term follow-up. Patients mean follow up time was 684±346 days, ranging from 28 to 1096 days. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery proved to be feasible, safe and effective and can be applied in the correction of various intra and extracardiac pathologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4878587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48785872016-08-10 Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure Poffo, Robinson Toschi, Alisson Parrilha Pope, Renato Bastos Celullare, Alex Luiz Benício, Anderson Fischer, Claudio Henrique Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos Teruya, Alexandre Hatanaka, Dina Mie Rusca, Gabriel Franzin Makdisse, Marcia Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and medium-term outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2013, 21 patients underwent robotic-assisted cardiac surgery. The procedures performed were: mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement, surgical correction of atrial fibrillation, surgical correction of atrial septal defect, intracardiac tumor resection, totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery and pericardiectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.39±18.05 years. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 151.7±99.97 minutes, and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 109.94±81.34 minutes. The mean duration of intubation was 7.52±15.2 hours, and 16 (76.2%) patients were extubated in the operating room immediately after the procedure. The mean length of intensive care unit stay was 1.67±1.46 days. There were no conversions to sternotomy. There was no in-hospital death or deaths during the medium-term follow-up. Patients mean follow up time was 684±346 days, ranging from 28 to 1096 days. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery proved to be feasible, safe and effective and can be applied in the correction of various intra and extracardiac pathologies. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4878587/ /pubmed/24136755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082013000300007 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Poffo, Robinson Toschi, Alisson Parrilha Pope, Renato Bastos Celullare, Alex Luiz Benício, Anderson Fischer, Claudio Henrique Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos Teruya, Alexandre Hatanaka, Dina Mie Rusca, Gabriel Franzin Makdisse, Marcia Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title | Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title_full | Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title_fullStr | Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title_short | Robotic surgery in Cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
title_sort | robotic surgery in cardiology: a safe and effective procedure |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082013000300007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pofforobinson roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT toschialissonparrilha roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT poperenatobastos roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT celullarealexluiz roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT benicioanderson roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT fischerclaudiohenrique roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT vieiramarceloluizcampos roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT teruyaalexandre roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT hatanakadinamie roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT ruscagabrielfranzin roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure AT makdissemarcia roboticsurgeryincardiologyasafeandeffectiveprocedure |