Cargando…

Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tendinopathy of the pectoralis major muscle in weightlifting athletes using ultrasound and elastography. METHODS: This study included 20 patients, 10 with rupture of the pectoralis major muscle and 10 control patients. We evaluated pectoralis major muscle contralateral tendon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pochini, Alberto de Castro, Ferretti, Mario, Kawakami, Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito, Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Corrêa, Yamada, Andre Fukunishi, de Oliveira, Gabriela Clemente, Cohen, Moisés, Andreoli, Carlos Vicente, Ejnisman, Benno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26761551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3335
_version_ 1782433589437136896
author Pochini, Alberto de Castro
Ferretti, Mario
Kawakami, Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Corrêa
Yamada, Andre Fukunishi
de Oliveira, Gabriela Clemente
Cohen, Moisés
Andreoli, Carlos Vicente
Ejnisman, Benno
author_facet Pochini, Alberto de Castro
Ferretti, Mario
Kawakami, Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Corrêa
Yamada, Andre Fukunishi
de Oliveira, Gabriela Clemente
Cohen, Moisés
Andreoli, Carlos Vicente
Ejnisman, Benno
author_sort Pochini, Alberto de Castro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tendinopathy of the pectoralis major muscle in weightlifting athletes using ultrasound and elastography. METHODS: This study included 20 patients, 10 with rupture of the pectoralis major muscle and 10 control patients. We evaluated pectoralis major muscle contralateral tendon with ultrasonographic and elastography examinations. The ultrasonographic examinations were performed using a high-resolution B mode ultrasound device. The elastography evaluation was classified into three patterns: (A), if stiff (more than 50% area with blue staining); (B), if intermediate (more than 50% green); and (C), if softened (more than 50% red). RESULTS: Patients’ mean age was 33±5.3 years. The presence of tendinous injury measured by ultrasound had a significant different (p=0.0055), because 80% of cases had tendinous injury versus 10% in the Control Group. No significant differences were seen between groups related with change in elastography (p=0.1409). CONCLUSION: Long-term bodybuilders had ultrasound image with more tendinous injury than those in Control Group. There was no statistical significance regarding change in tendon elasticity compared with Control Group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4878628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48786282016-08-10 Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography Pochini, Alberto de Castro Ferretti, Mario Kawakami, Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Corrêa Yamada, Andre Fukunishi de Oliveira, Gabriela Clemente Cohen, Moisés Andreoli, Carlos Vicente Ejnisman, Benno Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tendinopathy of the pectoralis major muscle in weightlifting athletes using ultrasound and elastography. METHODS: This study included 20 patients, 10 with rupture of the pectoralis major muscle and 10 control patients. We evaluated pectoralis major muscle contralateral tendon with ultrasonographic and elastography examinations. The ultrasonographic examinations were performed using a high-resolution B mode ultrasound device. The elastography evaluation was classified into three patterns: (A), if stiff (more than 50% area with blue staining); (B), if intermediate (more than 50% green); and (C), if softened (more than 50% red). RESULTS: Patients’ mean age was 33±5.3 years. The presence of tendinous injury measured by ultrasound had a significant different (p=0.0055), because 80% of cases had tendinous injury versus 10% in the Control Group. No significant differences were seen between groups related with change in elastography (p=0.1409). CONCLUSION: Long-term bodybuilders had ultrasound image with more tendinous injury than those in Control Group. There was no statistical significance regarding change in tendon elasticity compared with Control Group. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4878628/ /pubmed/26761551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3335 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pochini, Alberto de Castro
Ferretti, Mario
Kawakami, Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Corrêa
Yamada, Andre Fukunishi
de Oliveira, Gabriela Clemente
Cohen, Moisés
Andreoli, Carlos Vicente
Ejnisman, Benno
Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title_full Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title_fullStr Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title_full_unstemmed Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title_short Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
title_sort analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26761551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3335
work_keys_str_mv AT pochinialbertodecastro analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT ferrettimario analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT kawakamieduardofelipekinito analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT fernandesarturdarochacorrea analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT yamadaandrefukunishi analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT deoliveiragabrielaclemente analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT cohenmoises analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT andreolicarlosvicente analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography
AT ejnismanbenno analisysofpectoralismajortendoninweightliftingathletesusingultrasonographyandelastography