Cargando…

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be of limited use if the methods used to conduct the SR are flawed, and reporting of the SR is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Page, Matthew J., Shamseer, Larissa, Altman, Douglas G., Tetzlaff, Jennifer, Sampson, Margaret, Tricco, Andrea C., Catalá-López, Ferrán, Li, Lun, Reid, Emma K., Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael, Moher, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27218655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028

Ejemplares similares

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

How to properly use the PRISMA Statement
por: Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review(a)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
por: Tetzlaff, Jennifer M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

P05.50. CONSORT extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) guidelines
por: Shamseer, L, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: an updated review
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment
por: Cobey, Kelly D., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors’ perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
por: Stevens, Adrienne, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement
por: Hutton, Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Will COVID-19 result in a giant step backwards for women in academic science?
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol)
por: Mesko, Mauro Elias, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The biomedical and epidemiological characteristics of asbestos-related diseases: a review.
por: Huncharek, M.
Publicado: (1986)

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in Spain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Mapping of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional analysis
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Declaration of transparency for each research article
por: Altman, Douglas G, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews
por: Hunniford, Victoria T., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_l7vbagm34q21h5l772mkc407pk