Cargando…

Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study

Background: The corticospinal excitability indexed by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the sensorimotor cortex is characterized by large variability. The instantaneous phase of cortical oscillations at the time of the stimulation has been suggested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raco, Valerio, Bauer, Robert, Tharsan, Srikandarajah, Gharabaghi, Alireza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00143
_version_ 1782433638337478656
author Raco, Valerio
Bauer, Robert
Tharsan, Srikandarajah
Gharabaghi, Alireza
author_facet Raco, Valerio
Bauer, Robert
Tharsan, Srikandarajah
Gharabaghi, Alireza
author_sort Raco, Valerio
collection PubMed
description Background: The corticospinal excitability indexed by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the sensorimotor cortex is characterized by large variability. The instantaneous phase of cortical oscillations at the time of the stimulation has been suggested as a possible source of this variability. To explore this hypothesis, a specific phase needs to be targeted by TMS pulses with high temporal precision. Objective: The aim of this feasibility study was to introduce a methodology capable of exploring the effects of phase-dependent stimulation by the concurrent application of alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TMS. Method: We applied online calibration and closed-loop TMS to target four specific phases (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°) of simultaneous 20 Hz tACS over the primary motor cortex (M1) of seven healthy subjects. Result: The integrated stimulation system was capable of hitting the target phase with high precision (SD ± 2.05 ms, i.e., ± 14.45°) inducing phase-dependent MEP modulation with a phase lag (CI95% = −40.37° to −99.61°) which was stable across subjects (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The combination of different neuromodulation techniques facilitates highly specific brain state-dependent stimulation, and may constitute a valuable tool for exploring the physiological and therapeutic effect of phase-dependent stimulation, e.g., in the context of neurorehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4879130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48791302016-06-01 Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study Raco, Valerio Bauer, Robert Tharsan, Srikandarajah Gharabaghi, Alireza Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Background: The corticospinal excitability indexed by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the sensorimotor cortex is characterized by large variability. The instantaneous phase of cortical oscillations at the time of the stimulation has been suggested as a possible source of this variability. To explore this hypothesis, a specific phase needs to be targeted by TMS pulses with high temporal precision. Objective: The aim of this feasibility study was to introduce a methodology capable of exploring the effects of phase-dependent stimulation by the concurrent application of alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TMS. Method: We applied online calibration and closed-loop TMS to target four specific phases (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°) of simultaneous 20 Hz tACS over the primary motor cortex (M1) of seven healthy subjects. Result: The integrated stimulation system was capable of hitting the target phase with high precision (SD ± 2.05 ms, i.e., ± 14.45°) inducing phase-dependent MEP modulation with a phase lag (CI95% = −40.37° to −99.61°) which was stable across subjects (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The combination of different neuromodulation techniques facilitates highly specific brain state-dependent stimulation, and may constitute a valuable tool for exploring the physiological and therapeutic effect of phase-dependent stimulation, e.g., in the context of neurorehabilitation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4879130/ /pubmed/27252625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00143 Text en Copyright © 2016 Raco, Bauer, Tharsan and Gharabaghi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Raco, Valerio
Bauer, Robert
Tharsan, Srikandarajah
Gharabaghi, Alireza
Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title_full Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title_short Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study
title_sort combining tms and tacs for closed-loop phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability: a feasibility study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00143
work_keys_str_mv AT racovalerio combiningtmsandtacsforclosedloopphasedependentmodulationofcorticospinalexcitabilityafeasibilitystudy
AT bauerrobert combiningtmsandtacsforclosedloopphasedependentmodulationofcorticospinalexcitabilityafeasibilitystudy
AT tharsansrikandarajah combiningtmsandtacsforclosedloopphasedependentmodulationofcorticospinalexcitabilityafeasibilitystudy
AT gharabaghialireza combiningtmsandtacsforclosedloopphasedependentmodulationofcorticospinalexcitabilityafeasibilitystudy