Cargando…

Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) volume transperineal ultrasound imaging is increasingly used to assess changes in the dimensions of the pelvic floor during pregnancy and after delivery. Little is known with regard to the area of the puborectalis muscle a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grob, Anique T. M., Withagen, Mariella I. J., van de Waarsenburg, Maria K., Schweitzer, Karlijn J., van der Vaart, Carl H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2905-4
_version_ 1782433648222404608
author Grob, Anique T. M.
Withagen, Mariella I. J.
van de Waarsenburg, Maria K.
Schweitzer, Karlijn J.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
author_facet Grob, Anique T. M.
Withagen, Mariella I. J.
van de Waarsenburg, Maria K.
Schweitzer, Karlijn J.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
author_sort Grob, Anique T. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) volume transperineal ultrasound imaging is increasingly used to assess changes in the dimensions of the pelvic floor during pregnancy and after delivery. Little is known with regard to the area of the puborectalis muscle and its structural changes. Echogenicity measurement, a parameter that provides information on the structure of muscles, is increasingly used in orthopaedics and neuromuscular disease evaluation. This study is aimed at assessing the changes in the mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle (MEP) and the puborectalis muscle area (PMA) during first pregnancy and after childbirth. METHODS: The MEP and PMA of 254 women during first pregnancy were measured at 12 and 36 weeks’ gestation and 6 months postpartum. To determine the effect of child-birth on MEP and PMA, the results at 6 months postpartum were separately analysed for vaginal deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries (ventouse) and caesarean section deliveries. Mean differences in MEP and PMA were analysed using ANOVA statistics. RESULTS: The MEP at 6 months postpartum was, independent of manoeuvre, significantly (p < 0.001) lower than MEP values during pregnancy. After caesarean delivery, the PMA was significantly smaller at maximum pelvic floor contraction than PMA after vaginal delivery (p = 0.003) or operative vaginal delivery (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that structural changes in the puborectalis muscle during and after pregnancy, as measured by MEP, occur and can be analysed. In addition, the mode of delivery affects the area of the puborectalis during contraction after delivery. For true volume analysis, as part of an assessment of contractility of the puborectalis muscle we will need 3D volume analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4879173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48791732016-06-21 Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum Grob, Anique T. M. Withagen, Mariella I. J. van de Waarsenburg, Maria K. Schweitzer, Karlijn J. van der Vaart, Carl H. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) volume transperineal ultrasound imaging is increasingly used to assess changes in the dimensions of the pelvic floor during pregnancy and after delivery. Little is known with regard to the area of the puborectalis muscle and its structural changes. Echogenicity measurement, a parameter that provides information on the structure of muscles, is increasingly used in orthopaedics and neuromuscular disease evaluation. This study is aimed at assessing the changes in the mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle (MEP) and the puborectalis muscle area (PMA) during first pregnancy and after childbirth. METHODS: The MEP and PMA of 254 women during first pregnancy were measured at 12 and 36 weeks’ gestation and 6 months postpartum. To determine the effect of child-birth on MEP and PMA, the results at 6 months postpartum were separately analysed for vaginal deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries (ventouse) and caesarean section deliveries. Mean differences in MEP and PMA were analysed using ANOVA statistics. RESULTS: The MEP at 6 months postpartum was, independent of manoeuvre, significantly (p < 0.001) lower than MEP values during pregnancy. After caesarean delivery, the PMA was significantly smaller at maximum pelvic floor contraction than PMA after vaginal delivery (p = 0.003) or operative vaginal delivery (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that structural changes in the puborectalis muscle during and after pregnancy, as measured by MEP, occur and can be analysed. In addition, the mode of delivery affects the area of the puborectalis during contraction after delivery. For true volume analysis, as part of an assessment of contractility of the puborectalis muscle we will need 3D volume analysis. Springer London 2015-12-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4879173/ /pubmed/26676911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2905-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Grob, Anique T. M.
Withagen, Mariella I. J.
van de Waarsenburg, Maria K.
Schweitzer, Karlijn J.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title_full Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title_fullStr Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title_full_unstemmed Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title_short Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
title_sort changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2905-4
work_keys_str_mv AT grobaniquetm changesinthemeanechogenicityandareaofthepuborectalismuscleduringpregnancyandpostpartum
AT withagenmariellaij changesinthemeanechogenicityandareaofthepuborectalismuscleduringpregnancyandpostpartum
AT vandewaarsenburgmariak changesinthemeanechogenicityandareaofthepuborectalismuscleduringpregnancyandpostpartum
AT schweitzerkarlijnj changesinthemeanechogenicityandareaofthepuborectalismuscleduringpregnancyandpostpartum
AT vandervaartcarlh changesinthemeanechogenicityandareaofthepuborectalismuscleduringpregnancyandpostpartum