Cargando…

A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions

BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Epstein, Nancy Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546
_version_ 1782433733780963328
author Epstein, Nancy Ellen
author_facet Epstein, Nancy Ellen
author_sort Epstein, Nancy Ellen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. Several prior studies document a 1.3–5.6% reoperation rate following multilevel laminectomy with/without noninstrumented fusions. RESULTS: The reoperation rates for instrumented fusions, including for ASD, are substantially higher. One study cited a 12.2–18.5% frequency for reoperation following instrumented transforaminal lumbar and posterior lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF and PLIFs) at an average of 164 postoperative months. Another study cited a 9.9% reoperation rate for ASD 1 year following PLIF; this increased to 80% at 5 postoperative years. A further study compared 380 patients variously undergoing laminectomies/noninstrumented posterolateral fusions, laminectomies with instrumented fusions (PLFs), and laminectomies with instrumented PLF plus an interbody fusions; this study documented no significant differences in outcomes for any of these operations at 4 postoperative years. Furthermore, other series showed fusion rates for 1–2 level procedures which were often similar with or without instrumentation, while instrumentation increased reoperation rates and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies document no benefit for adding instrumentation to laminectomies performed for degenerative disease, including spondylolisthesis. Reoperation rates for laminectomy alone/laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions vary from 1.3% to 5.6% whereas reoperation rates for ASD after instrumented PLIF was 80% at 5 postoperative years. This review should prompt spinal surgeons to reexamine when, why, and whether instrumentation is really necessary, particularly for treating degenerative lumbar disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4879849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48798492016-06-07 A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions Epstein, Nancy Ellen Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. Several prior studies document a 1.3–5.6% reoperation rate following multilevel laminectomy with/without noninstrumented fusions. RESULTS: The reoperation rates for instrumented fusions, including for ASD, are substantially higher. One study cited a 12.2–18.5% frequency for reoperation following instrumented transforaminal lumbar and posterior lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF and PLIFs) at an average of 164 postoperative months. Another study cited a 9.9% reoperation rate for ASD 1 year following PLIF; this increased to 80% at 5 postoperative years. A further study compared 380 patients variously undergoing laminectomies/noninstrumented posterolateral fusions, laminectomies with instrumented fusions (PLFs), and laminectomies with instrumented PLF plus an interbody fusions; this study documented no significant differences in outcomes for any of these operations at 4 postoperative years. Furthermore, other series showed fusion rates for 1–2 level procedures which were often similar with or without instrumentation, while instrumentation increased reoperation rates and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies document no benefit for adding instrumentation to laminectomies performed for degenerative disease, including spondylolisthesis. Reoperation rates for laminectomy alone/laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions vary from 1.3% to 5.6% whereas reoperation rates for ASD after instrumented PLIF was 80% at 5 postoperative years. This review should prompt spinal surgeons to reexamine when, why, and whether instrumentation is really necessary, particularly for treating degenerative lumbar disease. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4879849/ /pubmed/27274408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Surgical Neurology International: Spine
Epstein, Nancy Ellen
A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title_full A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title_fullStr A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title_full_unstemmed A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title_short A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
title_sort review: reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
topic Surgical Neurology International: Spine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinnancyellen areviewreducedreoperationrateformultilevellumbarlaminectomieswithnoninstrumentedversusinstrumentedfusions
AT epsteinnancyellen reviewreducedreoperationrateformultilevellumbarlaminectomieswithnoninstrumentedversusinstrumentedfusions