Cargando…
A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions
BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546 |
_version_ | 1782433733780963328 |
---|---|
author | Epstein, Nancy Ellen |
author_facet | Epstein, Nancy Ellen |
author_sort | Epstein, Nancy Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. Several prior studies document a 1.3–5.6% reoperation rate following multilevel laminectomy with/without noninstrumented fusions. RESULTS: The reoperation rates for instrumented fusions, including for ASD, are substantially higher. One study cited a 12.2–18.5% frequency for reoperation following instrumented transforaminal lumbar and posterior lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF and PLIFs) at an average of 164 postoperative months. Another study cited a 9.9% reoperation rate for ASD 1 year following PLIF; this increased to 80% at 5 postoperative years. A further study compared 380 patients variously undergoing laminectomies/noninstrumented posterolateral fusions, laminectomies with instrumented fusions (PLFs), and laminectomies with instrumented PLF plus an interbody fusions; this study documented no significant differences in outcomes for any of these operations at 4 postoperative years. Furthermore, other series showed fusion rates for 1–2 level procedures which were often similar with or without instrumentation, while instrumentation increased reoperation rates and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies document no benefit for adding instrumentation to laminectomies performed for degenerative disease, including spondylolisthesis. Reoperation rates for laminectomy alone/laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions vary from 1.3% to 5.6% whereas reoperation rates for ASD after instrumented PLIF was 80% at 5 postoperative years. This review should prompt spinal surgeons to reexamine when, why, and whether instrumentation is really necessary, particularly for treating degenerative lumbar disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4879849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48798492016-06-07 A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions Epstein, Nancy Ellen Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate, including for adjacent segment disease (ASD), is lower following multilevel lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. METHODS: This study reviews selected literature focusing on the reoperation rate, including for ASD, following multilevel laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions. Several prior studies document a 1.3–5.6% reoperation rate following multilevel laminectomy with/without noninstrumented fusions. RESULTS: The reoperation rates for instrumented fusions, including for ASD, are substantially higher. One study cited a 12.2–18.5% frequency for reoperation following instrumented transforaminal lumbar and posterior lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF and PLIFs) at an average of 164 postoperative months. Another study cited a 9.9% reoperation rate for ASD 1 year following PLIF; this increased to 80% at 5 postoperative years. A further study compared 380 patients variously undergoing laminectomies/noninstrumented posterolateral fusions, laminectomies with instrumented fusions (PLFs), and laminectomies with instrumented PLF plus an interbody fusions; this study documented no significant differences in outcomes for any of these operations at 4 postoperative years. Furthermore, other series showed fusion rates for 1–2 level procedures which were often similar with or without instrumentation, while instrumentation increased reoperation rates and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies document no benefit for adding instrumentation to laminectomies performed for degenerative disease, including spondylolisthesis. Reoperation rates for laminectomy alone/laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions vary from 1.3% to 5.6% whereas reoperation rates for ASD after instrumented PLIF was 80% at 5 postoperative years. This review should prompt spinal surgeons to reexamine when, why, and whether instrumentation is really necessary, particularly for treating degenerative lumbar disease. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4879849/ /pubmed/27274408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgical Neurology International: Spine Epstein, Nancy Ellen A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title | A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title_full | A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title_fullStr | A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title_full_unstemmed | A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title_short | A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
title_sort | review: reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions |
topic | Surgical Neurology International: Spine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.182546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT epsteinnancyellen areviewreducedreoperationrateformultilevellumbarlaminectomieswithnoninstrumentedversusinstrumentedfusions AT epsteinnancyellen reviewreducedreoperationrateformultilevellumbarlaminectomieswithnoninstrumentedversusinstrumentedfusions |