Cargando…
First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy
AIMS: One option to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responder rates lies in the optimization of pacing intervals. A haemodynamic sensor embedded in the SonRtip atrial lead measures cardiac contractility and provides a systematic automatic atrioventricular and interventricular delays...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25976907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv114 |
_version_ | 1782433764018749440 |
---|---|
author | Duncker, David Delnoy, Peter Paul Nägele, Herbert Mansourati, Jacques Mont, Lluís Anselme, Frédéric Stengel, Petra Anselmi, Francesca Oswald, Hanno Leclercq, Christophe |
author_facet | Duncker, David Delnoy, Peter Paul Nägele, Herbert Mansourati, Jacques Mont, Lluís Anselme, Frédéric Stengel, Petra Anselmi, Francesca Oswald, Hanno Leclercq, Christophe |
author_sort | Duncker, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: One option to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responder rates lies in the optimization of pacing intervals. A haemodynamic sensor embedded in the SonRtip atrial lead measures cardiac contractility and provides a systematic automatic atrioventricular and interventricular delays optimization. This multi-centre study evaluated the safety and performance of the lead, up to 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were implanted with the system composed of the lead and a CRT-Defibrillator device. Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-implant. The primary safety objective was to demonstrate that the atrial lead complication free rate was superior to 90% at 3-months follow-up visit. A lead handling questionnaire was filled by implanting investigators. Lead electrical performances and the performance of the system to compute AV and VV delays were evaluated at each study visit over 1 year. The complication free rate at 3 months post-implant was 99.0% [95%CI 94.5–100.0%], P < 0.001. Electrical performances of the lead were adequate whatever the atrial lead position and remained stable over the study period. The optimization algorithm was able to compute AV and VV delays in 97% of patients, during >75% of the weeks. CONCLUSION: The atrial lead is safe to implant and shows stable electrical performance over time. It therefore offers a promising tool for automatic CRT optimization to further improve responder rates to CRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4880111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48801112016-05-31 First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy Duncker, David Delnoy, Peter Paul Nägele, Herbert Mansourati, Jacques Mont, Lluís Anselme, Frédéric Stengel, Petra Anselmi, Francesca Oswald, Hanno Leclercq, Christophe Europace Clinical Research AIMS: One option to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responder rates lies in the optimization of pacing intervals. A haemodynamic sensor embedded in the SonRtip atrial lead measures cardiac contractility and provides a systematic automatic atrioventricular and interventricular delays optimization. This multi-centre study evaluated the safety and performance of the lead, up to 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were implanted with the system composed of the lead and a CRT-Defibrillator device. Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-implant. The primary safety objective was to demonstrate that the atrial lead complication free rate was superior to 90% at 3-months follow-up visit. A lead handling questionnaire was filled by implanting investigators. Lead electrical performances and the performance of the system to compute AV and VV delays were evaluated at each study visit over 1 year. The complication free rate at 3 months post-implant was 99.0% [95%CI 94.5–100.0%], P < 0.001. Electrical performances of the lead were adequate whatever the atrial lead position and remained stable over the study period. The optimization algorithm was able to compute AV and VV delays in 97% of patients, during >75% of the weeks. CONCLUSION: The atrial lead is safe to implant and shows stable electrical performance over time. It therefore offers a promising tool for automatic CRT optimization to further improve responder rates to CRT. Oxford University Press 2016-05 2015-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4880111/ /pubmed/25976907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv114 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Duncker, David Delnoy, Peter Paul Nägele, Herbert Mansourati, Jacques Mont, Lluís Anselme, Frédéric Stengel, Petra Anselmi, Francesca Oswald, Hanno Leclercq, Christophe First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title | First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full | First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_fullStr | First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_short | First clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_sort | first clinical evaluation of an atrial haemodynamic sensor lead for automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25976907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunckerdavid firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT delnoypeterpaul firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT nageleherbert firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT mansouratijacques firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT montlluis firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT anselmefrederic firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT stengelpetra firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT anselmifrancesca firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT oswaldhanno firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT leclercqchristophe firstclinicalevaluationofanatrialhaemodynamicsensorleadforautomaticoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapy |