Cargando…

Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat

Experimental and comparative evidence suggests that the striped coats of zebras deter biting fly attack, but the mechanisms by which flies fail to target black-and-white mammals are still opaque. Two hypotheses have been proposed: stripes might serve either to defeat polarotaxis or to obscure the fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Britten, Kenneth H., Thatcher, Timothy D., Caro, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27223616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154504
_version_ 1782433792439353344
author Britten, Kenneth H.
Thatcher, Timothy D.
Caro, Tim
author_facet Britten, Kenneth H.
Thatcher, Timothy D.
Caro, Tim
author_sort Britten, Kenneth H.
collection PubMed
description Experimental and comparative evidence suggests that the striped coats of zebras deter biting fly attack, but the mechanisms by which flies fail to target black-and-white mammals are still opaque. Two hypotheses have been proposed: stripes might serve either to defeat polarotaxis or to obscure the form of the animal. To test these hypotheses, we systematically photographed free-living plains zebras in Africa. We found that black and white stripes both have moderate polarization signatures with a similar angle, though the degree (magnitude) of polarization in white stripes is lower. When we modeled the visibility of these signals from different distances, we found that polarization differences between stripes are invisible to flies more than 10 m away because they are averaged out by the flies’ low visual resolution. At any distance, however, a positively polarotactic insect would have a distinct signal to guide its visual approach to a zebra because we found that polarization of light reflecting from zebras is higher than from surrounding dry grasses. We also found that the stripes themselves are visible to flies at somewhat greater distances (up to 20 m) than the polarization contrast between stripes. Together, these observations support hypotheses in which zebra stripes defeat visually guided orienting behavior in flies by a mechanism independent of polarotaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4880349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48803492016-06-09 Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat Britten, Kenneth H. Thatcher, Timothy D. Caro, Tim PLoS One Research Article Experimental and comparative evidence suggests that the striped coats of zebras deter biting fly attack, but the mechanisms by which flies fail to target black-and-white mammals are still opaque. Two hypotheses have been proposed: stripes might serve either to defeat polarotaxis or to obscure the form of the animal. To test these hypotheses, we systematically photographed free-living plains zebras in Africa. We found that black and white stripes both have moderate polarization signatures with a similar angle, though the degree (magnitude) of polarization in white stripes is lower. When we modeled the visibility of these signals from different distances, we found that polarization differences between stripes are invisible to flies more than 10 m away because they are averaged out by the flies’ low visual resolution. At any distance, however, a positively polarotactic insect would have a distinct signal to guide its visual approach to a zebra because we found that polarization of light reflecting from zebras is higher than from surrounding dry grasses. We also found that the stripes themselves are visible to flies at somewhat greater distances (up to 20 m) than the polarization contrast between stripes. Together, these observations support hypotheses in which zebra stripes defeat visually guided orienting behavior in flies by a mechanism independent of polarotaxis. Public Library of Science 2016-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4880349/ /pubmed/27223616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154504 Text en © 2016 Britten et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Britten, Kenneth H.
Thatcher, Timothy D.
Caro, Tim
Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title_full Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title_fullStr Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title_full_unstemmed Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title_short Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat
title_sort zebras and biting flies: quantitative analysis of reflected light from zebra coats in their natural habitat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27223616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154504
work_keys_str_mv AT brittenkennethh zebrasandbitingfliesquantitativeanalysisofreflectedlightfromzebracoatsintheirnaturalhabitat
AT thatchertimothyd zebrasandbitingfliesquantitativeanalysisofreflectedlightfromzebracoatsintheirnaturalhabitat
AT carotim zebrasandbitingfliesquantitativeanalysisofreflectedlightfromzebracoatsintheirnaturalhabitat