Cargando…

The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES: To report 2-years experience of using transfusion-related quality indicators as a tool in hemovigilance system implementation. METHODS: The study was carried out between 2012 and 2013. Blood transfusion service data were prospectively collected at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jedd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hindawi, Salwa I., Badawi, Maha A., Raj, Edwin T., Gholam, Kholoud A., Al-Weail, Seraj O., Azher, Fatima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146617
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.5.15084
_version_ 1782433824813088768
author Hindawi, Salwa I.
Badawi, Maha A.
Raj, Edwin T.
Gholam, Kholoud A.
Al-Weail, Seraj O.
Azher, Fatima
author_facet Hindawi, Salwa I.
Badawi, Maha A.
Raj, Edwin T.
Gholam, Kholoud A.
Al-Weail, Seraj O.
Azher, Fatima
author_sort Hindawi, Salwa I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To report 2-years experience of using transfusion-related quality indicators as a tool in hemovigilance system implementation. METHODS: The study was carried out between 2012 and 2013. Blood transfusion service data were prospectively collected at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Donor reactions, transfusion reactions, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in-date wastage, incidents, and errors pertaining to orders, or requests were collected quarterly and prospectively and forwarded to the Hospital Transfusion Committee (HTC) for review. RESULTS: Donor population consisted of 23,132 donors. One hundred and forty-eight donor reactions were reported, resulting in a rate of 0.6%. Eighty-four transfusion reactions were reported and most were allergic reactions (79.7%). Errors or incidents were reported with approximately 0.3% of the total number of submitted samples/request forms. The FFP in-date wastage was 21.3% of the total FFP wastage. The HTC regularly reviewed the hemovigilance data and reporting; and safety improvements were implemented. CONCLUSION: The use of quality indicators as a tool for developing and implementing a hemovigilance system provided a better understanding of improvement areas for continuous progress in quality and safety, and is expected to enhance these features along the blood transfusion chain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4880654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48806542016-06-09 The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia Hindawi, Salwa I. Badawi, Maha A. Raj, Edwin T. Gholam, Kholoud A. Al-Weail, Seraj O. Azher, Fatima Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To report 2-years experience of using transfusion-related quality indicators as a tool in hemovigilance system implementation. METHODS: The study was carried out between 2012 and 2013. Blood transfusion service data were prospectively collected at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Donor reactions, transfusion reactions, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in-date wastage, incidents, and errors pertaining to orders, or requests were collected quarterly and prospectively and forwarded to the Hospital Transfusion Committee (HTC) for review. RESULTS: Donor population consisted of 23,132 donors. One hundred and forty-eight donor reactions were reported, resulting in a rate of 0.6%. Eighty-four transfusion reactions were reported and most were allergic reactions (79.7%). Errors or incidents were reported with approximately 0.3% of the total number of submitted samples/request forms. The FFP in-date wastage was 21.3% of the total FFP wastage. The HTC regularly reviewed the hemovigilance data and reporting; and safety improvements were implemented. CONCLUSION: The use of quality indicators as a tool for developing and implementing a hemovigilance system provided a better understanding of improvement areas for continuous progress in quality and safety, and is expected to enhance these features along the blood transfusion chain. Saudi Medical Journal 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4880654/ /pubmed/27146617 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.5.15084 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hindawi, Salwa I.
Badawi, Maha A.
Raj, Edwin T.
Gholam, Kholoud A.
Al-Weail, Seraj O.
Azher, Fatima
The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title_full The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title_short The use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia
title_sort use of transfusion quality indicators as a tool for hemovigilance system implementation at a tertiary care center in saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146617
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.5.15084
work_keys_str_mv AT hindawisalwai theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT badawimahaa theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT rajedwint theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT gholamkholouda theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT alweailserajo theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT azherfatima theuseoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT hindawisalwai useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT badawimahaa useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT rajedwint useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT gholamkholouda useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT alweailserajo useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia
AT azherfatima useoftransfusionqualityindicatorsasatoolforhemovigilancesystemimplementationatatertiarycarecenterinsaudiarabia