Cargando…

Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain

BACKGROUND: The problem of learning causal influences from data has recently attracted much attention. Standard statistical methods can have difficulty learning discrete causes, which interacting to affect a target, because the assumptions in these methods often do not model discrete causal relation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Zexian, Jiang, Xia, Neapolitan, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8
_version_ 1782433852150513664
author Zeng, Zexian
Jiang, Xia
Neapolitan, Richard
author_facet Zeng, Zexian
Jiang, Xia
Neapolitan, Richard
author_sort Zeng, Zexian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The problem of learning causal influences from data has recently attracted much attention. Standard statistical methods can have difficulty learning discrete causes, which interacting to affect a target, because the assumptions in these methods often do not model discrete causal relationships well. An important task then is to learn such interactions from data. Motivated by the problem of learning epistatic interactions from datasets developed in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), researchers conceived new methods for learning discrete interactions. However, many of these methods do not differentiate a model representing a true interaction from a model representing non-interacting causes with strong individual affects. The recent algorithm MBS-IGain addresses this difficulty by using Bayesian network learning and information gain to discover interactions from high-dimensional datasets. However, MBS-IGain requires marginal effects to detect interactions containing more than two causes. If the dataset is not high-dimensional, we can avoid this shortcoming by doing an exhaustive search. RESULTS: We develop Exhaustive-IGain, which is like MBS-IGain but does an exhaustive search. We compare the performance of Exhaustive-IGain to MBS-IGain using low-dimensional simulated datasets based on interactions with marginal effects and ones based on interactions without marginal effects. Their performance is similar on the datasets based on marginal effects. However, Exhaustive-IGain compellingly outperforms MBS-IGain on the datasets based on 3 and 4-cause interactions without marginal effects. We apply Exhaustive-IGain to investigate how clinical variables interact to affect breast cancer survival, and obtain results that agree with judgements of a breast cancer oncologist. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combined use of information gain and Bayesian network scoring enables us to discover higher order interactions with no marginal effects if we perform an exhaustive search. We further conclude that Exhaustive-IGain can be effective when applied to real data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4880828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48808282016-06-07 Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain Zeng, Zexian Jiang, Xia Neapolitan, Richard BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The problem of learning causal influences from data has recently attracted much attention. Standard statistical methods can have difficulty learning discrete causes, which interacting to affect a target, because the assumptions in these methods often do not model discrete causal relationships well. An important task then is to learn such interactions from data. Motivated by the problem of learning epistatic interactions from datasets developed in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), researchers conceived new methods for learning discrete interactions. However, many of these methods do not differentiate a model representing a true interaction from a model representing non-interacting causes with strong individual affects. The recent algorithm MBS-IGain addresses this difficulty by using Bayesian network learning and information gain to discover interactions from high-dimensional datasets. However, MBS-IGain requires marginal effects to detect interactions containing more than two causes. If the dataset is not high-dimensional, we can avoid this shortcoming by doing an exhaustive search. RESULTS: We develop Exhaustive-IGain, which is like MBS-IGain but does an exhaustive search. We compare the performance of Exhaustive-IGain to MBS-IGain using low-dimensional simulated datasets based on interactions with marginal effects and ones based on interactions without marginal effects. Their performance is similar on the datasets based on marginal effects. However, Exhaustive-IGain compellingly outperforms MBS-IGain on the datasets based on 3 and 4-cause interactions without marginal effects. We apply Exhaustive-IGain to investigate how clinical variables interact to affect breast cancer survival, and obtain results that agree with judgements of a breast cancer oncologist. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combined use of information gain and Bayesian network scoring enables us to discover higher order interactions with no marginal effects if we perform an exhaustive search. We further conclude that Exhaustive-IGain can be effective when applied to real data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4880828/ /pubmed/27230078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8 Text en © Zeng et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Zeng, Zexian
Jiang, Xia
Neapolitan, Richard
Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title_full Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title_fullStr Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title_full_unstemmed Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title_short Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain
title_sort discovering causal interactions using bayesian network scoring and information gain
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zengzexian discoveringcausalinteractionsusingbayesiannetworkscoringandinformationgain
AT jiangxia discoveringcausalinteractionsusingbayesiannetworkscoringandinformationgain
AT neapolitanrichard discoveringcausalinteractionsusingbayesiannetworkscoringandinformationgain