Cargando…

Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients

BACKGROUND: Clinical history-taking can be employed as a standardized approach to elucidate the use of herbal medicines and their linked suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hospitalized patients. We sought to identify herbal medicines nominated by Ugandan inpatients; compare nomination rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiguba, Ronald, Ononge, Sam, Karamagi, Charles, Bird, Sheila M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1125-x
_version_ 1782433897104015360
author Kiguba, Ronald
Ononge, Sam
Karamagi, Charles
Bird, Sheila M.
author_facet Kiguba, Ronald
Ononge, Sam
Karamagi, Charles
Bird, Sheila M.
author_sort Kiguba, Ronald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical history-taking can be employed as a standardized approach to elucidate the use of herbal medicines and their linked suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hospitalized patients. We sought to identify herbal medicines nominated by Ugandan inpatients; compare nomination rates by ward and gender; confirm the herbs’ known pharmacological properties from published literature; and identify ADRs linked to pre-admission use of herbal medicines. METHODS: Prospective cohort of consented adult inpatients designed to assess medication use and ADRs on one gynaecological and three medical wards of 1790-bed Mulago National Referral Hospital. Baseline and follow-up data were obtained on patients’ characteristics, including pre-admission use of herbal medicines. RESULTS: Fourteen percent (26/191) of females in Gynaecology nominated at least one specific herbal medicine compared with 20 % (114/571) of inpatients on medical wards [20 % (69/343) of females; 20 % (45/228) of males]. Frequent nominations were Persea americana (30), Mumbwa/multiple-herb clay rods (23), Aloe barbadensis (22), Beta vulgaris (12), Vernonia amygdalina (11), Commelina africana (7), Bidens pilosa (7), Hoslundia opposita (6), Mangifera indica (4), and Dicliptera laxata (4). Four inpatients experienced 10 suspected ADRs linked to pre-admission herbal medicine use including Commelina africana (4), multiple-herb-mumbwa (1), or unspecified local-herbs (5): three ADR-cases were abortion-related and one kidney-related. CONCLUSIONS: The named herbal medicines and their nomination rates generally differed by specialized ward, probably guided by local folklore knowledge of their use. Clinical elicitation from inpatients can generate valuable safety data on herbal medicine use. However, larger routine studies might increase the utility of our method to assess herbal medicine use and detect herb-linked ADRs. Future studies should take testable samples of ADR-implicated herbal medicines for further analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1125-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4881043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48810432016-05-27 Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients Kiguba, Ronald Ononge, Sam Karamagi, Charles Bird, Sheila M. BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical history-taking can be employed as a standardized approach to elucidate the use of herbal medicines and their linked suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hospitalized patients. We sought to identify herbal medicines nominated by Ugandan inpatients; compare nomination rates by ward and gender; confirm the herbs’ known pharmacological properties from published literature; and identify ADRs linked to pre-admission use of herbal medicines. METHODS: Prospective cohort of consented adult inpatients designed to assess medication use and ADRs on one gynaecological and three medical wards of 1790-bed Mulago National Referral Hospital. Baseline and follow-up data were obtained on patients’ characteristics, including pre-admission use of herbal medicines. RESULTS: Fourteen percent (26/191) of females in Gynaecology nominated at least one specific herbal medicine compared with 20 % (114/571) of inpatients on medical wards [20 % (69/343) of females; 20 % (45/228) of males]. Frequent nominations were Persea americana (30), Mumbwa/multiple-herb clay rods (23), Aloe barbadensis (22), Beta vulgaris (12), Vernonia amygdalina (11), Commelina africana (7), Bidens pilosa (7), Hoslundia opposita (6), Mangifera indica (4), and Dicliptera laxata (4). Four inpatients experienced 10 suspected ADRs linked to pre-admission herbal medicine use including Commelina africana (4), multiple-herb-mumbwa (1), or unspecified local-herbs (5): three ADR-cases were abortion-related and one kidney-related. CONCLUSIONS: The named herbal medicines and their nomination rates generally differed by specialized ward, probably guided by local folklore knowledge of their use. Clinical elicitation from inpatients can generate valuable safety data on herbal medicine use. However, larger routine studies might increase the utility of our method to assess herbal medicine use and detect herb-linked ADRs. Future studies should take testable samples of ADR-implicated herbal medicines for further analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1125-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4881043/ /pubmed/27229463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1125-x Text en © Kiguba et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiguba, Ronald
Ononge, Sam
Karamagi, Charles
Bird, Sheila M.
Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title_full Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title_fullStr Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title_full_unstemmed Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title_short Herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of Ugandan inpatients
title_sort herbal medicine use and linked suspected adverse drug reactions in a prospective cohort of ugandan inpatients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1125-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kigubaronald herbalmedicineuseandlinkedsuspectedadversedrugreactionsinaprospectivecohortofugandaninpatients
AT onongesam herbalmedicineuseandlinkedsuspectedadversedrugreactionsinaprospectivecohortofugandaninpatients
AT karamagicharles herbalmedicineuseandlinkedsuspectedadversedrugreactionsinaprospectivecohortofugandaninpatients
AT birdsheilam herbalmedicineuseandlinkedsuspectedadversedrugreactionsinaprospectivecohortofugandaninpatients