Cargando…
Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8 |
_version_ | 1782433898443046912 |
---|---|
author | Foley, Louise Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Marsh, Samantha Epstein, Leonard H. Olds, Tim Dewes, Ofa Heke, Ihirangi Jiang, Yannan Maddison, Ralph |
author_facet | Foley, Louise Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Marsh, Samantha Epstein, Leonard H. Olds, Tim Dewes, Ofa Heke, Ihirangi Jiang, Yannan Maddison, Ralph |
author_sort | Foley, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To explore these null findings, we conducted a pre-planned process evaluation, focussing on intervention delivery and uptake. METHODS: SWITCH was a randomised controlled trial of a 6-month family intervention to reduce screen time in overweight children aged 9–12 years (n = 251). Community workers met with each child’s primary caregiver to deliver the intervention content. Community workers underwent standard training and were monitored once by a member of the research team to assess intervention delivery. The primary caregiver implemented the intervention with their child, and self-reported intervention use at 3 and 6 months. An exploratory analysis determined whether child outcomes at 6 months varied by primary caregiver use of the intervention. RESULTS: Monitoring indicated that community workers delivered all core intervention components to primary caregivers. However, two thirds of primary caregivers reported using any intervention component “sometimes” or less frequently at both time points, suggesting that intervention uptake was poor. Additionally, analyses indicated no effect of primary caregiver intervention use on child outcomes at 6 months, suggesting the intervention itself lacked efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Poor uptake, and the efficacy of the intervention itself, may have played a role in the null findings of the SWITCH trial on health behaviour and body composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12611000164998); registration date: 10/02/2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4881049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48810492016-05-27 Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention Foley, Louise Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Marsh, Samantha Epstein, Leonard H. Olds, Tim Dewes, Ofa Heke, Ihirangi Jiang, Yannan Maddison, Ralph BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To explore these null findings, we conducted a pre-planned process evaluation, focussing on intervention delivery and uptake. METHODS: SWITCH was a randomised controlled trial of a 6-month family intervention to reduce screen time in overweight children aged 9–12 years (n = 251). Community workers met with each child’s primary caregiver to deliver the intervention content. Community workers underwent standard training and were monitored once by a member of the research team to assess intervention delivery. The primary caregiver implemented the intervention with their child, and self-reported intervention use at 3 and 6 months. An exploratory analysis determined whether child outcomes at 6 months varied by primary caregiver use of the intervention. RESULTS: Monitoring indicated that community workers delivered all core intervention components to primary caregivers. However, two thirds of primary caregivers reported using any intervention component “sometimes” or less frequently at both time points, suggesting that intervention uptake was poor. Additionally, analyses indicated no effect of primary caregiver intervention use on child outcomes at 6 months, suggesting the intervention itself lacked efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Poor uptake, and the efficacy of the intervention itself, may have played a role in the null findings of the SWITCH trial on health behaviour and body composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12611000164998); registration date: 10/02/2011. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4881049/ /pubmed/27230770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8 Text en © Foley et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Foley, Louise Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Marsh, Samantha Epstein, Leonard H. Olds, Tim Dewes, Ofa Heke, Ihirangi Jiang, Yannan Maddison, Ralph Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title | Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title_full | Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title_fullStr | Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title_short | Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
title_sort | screen time weight-loss intervention targeting children at home (switch): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foleylouise screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT nimhurchucliona screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT marshsamantha screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT epsteinleonardh screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT oldstim screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT dewesofa screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT hekeihirangi screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT jiangyannan screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention AT maddisonralph screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention |