Cargando…

Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention

BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Louise, Ni Mhurchu, Cliona, Marsh, Samantha, Epstein, Leonard H., Olds, Tim, Dewes, Ofa, Heke, Ihirangi, Jiang, Yannan, Maddison, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8
_version_ 1782433898443046912
author Foley, Louise
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Marsh, Samantha
Epstein, Leonard H.
Olds, Tim
Dewes, Ofa
Heke, Ihirangi
Jiang, Yannan
Maddison, Ralph
author_facet Foley, Louise
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Marsh, Samantha
Epstein, Leonard H.
Olds, Tim
Dewes, Ofa
Heke, Ihirangi
Jiang, Yannan
Maddison, Ralph
author_sort Foley, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To explore these null findings, we conducted a pre-planned process evaluation, focussing on intervention delivery and uptake. METHODS: SWITCH was a randomised controlled trial of a 6-month family intervention to reduce screen time in overweight children aged 9–12 years (n = 251). Community workers met with each child’s primary caregiver to deliver the intervention content. Community workers underwent standard training and were monitored once by a member of the research team to assess intervention delivery. The primary caregiver implemented the intervention with their child, and self-reported intervention use at 3 and 6 months. An exploratory analysis determined whether child outcomes at 6 months varied by primary caregiver use of the intervention. RESULTS: Monitoring indicated that community workers delivered all core intervention components to primary caregivers. However, two thirds of primary caregivers reported using any intervention component “sometimes” or less frequently at both time points, suggesting that intervention uptake was poor. Additionally, analyses indicated no effect of primary caregiver intervention use on child outcomes at 6 months, suggesting the intervention itself lacked efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Poor uptake, and the efficacy of the intervention itself, may have played a role in the null findings of the SWITCH trial on health behaviour and body composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12611000164998); registration date: 10/02/2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4881049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48810492016-05-27 Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention Foley, Louise Ni Mhurchu, Cliona Marsh, Samantha Epstein, Leonard H. Olds, Tim Dewes, Ofa Heke, Ihirangi Jiang, Yannan Maddison, Ralph BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH) trial tested a family intervention to reduce screen-based sedentary behaviour in overweight children. The trial found no significant effect of the intervention on children’s screen-based sedentary behaviour. To explore these null findings, we conducted a pre-planned process evaluation, focussing on intervention delivery and uptake. METHODS: SWITCH was a randomised controlled trial of a 6-month family intervention to reduce screen time in overweight children aged 9–12 years (n = 251). Community workers met with each child’s primary caregiver to deliver the intervention content. Community workers underwent standard training and were monitored once by a member of the research team to assess intervention delivery. The primary caregiver implemented the intervention with their child, and self-reported intervention use at 3 and 6 months. An exploratory analysis determined whether child outcomes at 6 months varied by primary caregiver use of the intervention. RESULTS: Monitoring indicated that community workers delivered all core intervention components to primary caregivers. However, two thirds of primary caregivers reported using any intervention component “sometimes” or less frequently at both time points, suggesting that intervention uptake was poor. Additionally, analyses indicated no effect of primary caregiver intervention use on child outcomes at 6 months, suggesting the intervention itself lacked efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Poor uptake, and the efficacy of the intervention itself, may have played a role in the null findings of the SWITCH trial on health behaviour and body composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12611000164998); registration date: 10/02/2011. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4881049/ /pubmed/27230770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8 Text en © Foley et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Foley, Louise
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Marsh, Samantha
Epstein, Leonard H.
Olds, Tim
Dewes, Ofa
Heke, Ihirangi
Jiang, Yannan
Maddison, Ralph
Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title_full Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title_fullStr Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title_full_unstemmed Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title_short Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
title_sort screen time weight-loss intervention targeting children at home (switch): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3124-8
work_keys_str_mv AT foleylouise screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT nimhurchucliona screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT marshsamantha screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT epsteinleonardh screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT oldstim screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT dewesofa screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT hekeihirangi screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT jiangyannan screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention
AT maddisonralph screentimeweightlossinterventiontargetingchildrenathomeswitchprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialintervention