Cargando…

Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles

[Image: see text] Ensemble docking can be a successful virtual screening technique that addresses the innate conformational heterogeneity of macromolecular drug targets. Yet, lacking a method to identify a subset of conformational states that effectively segregates active and inactive small molecule...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swift, Robert V., Jusoh, Siti A., Offutt, Tavina L., Li, Eric S., Amaro, Rommie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00684
_version_ 1782433930738139136
author Swift, Robert V.
Jusoh, Siti A.
Offutt, Tavina L.
Li, Eric S.
Amaro, Rommie E.
author_facet Swift, Robert V.
Jusoh, Siti A.
Offutt, Tavina L.
Li, Eric S.
Amaro, Rommie E.
author_sort Swift, Robert V.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Ensemble docking can be a successful virtual screening technique that addresses the innate conformational heterogeneity of macromolecular drug targets. Yet, lacking a method to identify a subset of conformational states that effectively segregates active and inactive small molecules, ensemble docking may result in the recommendation of a large number of false positives. Here, three knowledge-based methods that construct structural ensembles for virtual screening are presented. Each method selects ensembles by optimizing an objective function calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: either the area under the ROC curve (AUC) or a ROC enrichment factor (EF). As the number of receptor conformations, N, becomes large, the methods differ in their asymptotic scaling. Given a set of small molecules with known activities and a collection of target conformations, the most resource intense method is guaranteed to find the optimal ensemble but scales as O(2(N)). A recursive approximation to the optimal solution scales as O(N(2)), and a more severe approximation leads to a faster method that scales linearly, O(N). The techniques are generally applicable to any system, and we demonstrate their effectiveness on the androgen nuclear hormone receptor (AR), cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPAR-δ) drug targets. Conformations that consisted of a crystal structure and molecular dynamics simulation cluster centroids were used to form AR and CDK2 ensembles. Multiple available crystal structures were used to form PPAR-δ ensembles. For each target, we show that the three methods perform similarly to one another on both the training and test sets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4881196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48811962016-05-27 Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles Swift, Robert V. Jusoh, Siti A. Offutt, Tavina L. Li, Eric S. Amaro, Rommie E. J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] Ensemble docking can be a successful virtual screening technique that addresses the innate conformational heterogeneity of macromolecular drug targets. Yet, lacking a method to identify a subset of conformational states that effectively segregates active and inactive small molecules, ensemble docking may result in the recommendation of a large number of false positives. Here, three knowledge-based methods that construct structural ensembles for virtual screening are presented. Each method selects ensembles by optimizing an objective function calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: either the area under the ROC curve (AUC) or a ROC enrichment factor (EF). As the number of receptor conformations, N, becomes large, the methods differ in their asymptotic scaling. Given a set of small molecules with known activities and a collection of target conformations, the most resource intense method is guaranteed to find the optimal ensemble but scales as O(2(N)). A recursive approximation to the optimal solution scales as O(N(2)), and a more severe approximation leads to a faster method that scales linearly, O(N). The techniques are generally applicable to any system, and we demonstrate their effectiveness on the androgen nuclear hormone receptor (AR), cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPAR-δ) drug targets. Conformations that consisted of a crystal structure and molecular dynamics simulation cluster centroids were used to form AR and CDK2 ensembles. Multiple available crystal structures were used to form PPAR-δ ensembles. For each target, we show that the three methods perform similarly to one another on both the training and test sets. American Chemical Society 2016-04-20 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4881196/ /pubmed/27097522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00684 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Swift, Robert V.
Jusoh, Siti A.
Offutt, Tavina L.
Li, Eric S.
Amaro, Rommie E.
Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title_full Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title_fullStr Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title_short Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles
title_sort knowledge-based methods to train and optimize virtual screening ensembles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00684
work_keys_str_mv AT swiftrobertv knowledgebasedmethodstotrainandoptimizevirtualscreeningensembles
AT jusohsitia knowledgebasedmethodstotrainandoptimizevirtualscreeningensembles
AT offutttavinal knowledgebasedmethodstotrainandoptimizevirtualscreeningensembles
AT lierics knowledgebasedmethodstotrainandoptimizevirtualscreeningensembles
AT amarorommiee knowledgebasedmethodstotrainandoptimizevirtualscreeningensembles