Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data

Different analytical methods can yield competing interpretations of evolutionary history and, currently, there is no definitive method for phylogenetic reconstruction using morphological data. Parsimony has been the primary method for analysing morphological data, but there has been a resurgence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Reilly, Joseph E., Puttick, Mark N., Parry, Luke, Tanner, Alastair R., Tarver, James E., Fleming, James, Pisani, Davide, Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Palaeontology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0081

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0081

Ejemplares similares