Cargando…
Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data
Different analytical methods can yield competing interpretations of evolutionary history and, currently, there is no definitive method for phylogenetic reconstruction using morphological data. Parsimony has been the primary method for analysing morphological data, but there has been a resurgence of...
Autores principales: | O'Reilly, Joseph E., Puttick, Mark N., Parry, Luke, Tanner, Alastair R., Tarver, James E., Fleming, James, Pisani, Davide, Donoghue, Philip C. J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0081 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees
por: Sansom, Robert S., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Partially incorrect fossil data augment analyses of discrete trait evolution in living species
por: Puttick, Mark N.
Publicado: (2016) -
Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data
por: O'Reilly, Joseph E., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Romundina and the evolutionary origin of teeth
por: Rücklin, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Reply to ‘placoderms and the evolutionary origin of teeth’: Burrow et al. (2016)
por: Rücklin, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)