Cargando…

Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test

INTRODUCTION: Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction is a condition in which the physical activity causes constriction of airways in patients with airway hyper- responsiveness. In this study, we tried to study and evaluate any relationship between the findings of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghanei, Mostafa, Aliannejad, Rasoul, Mazloumi, Mahdi, Saburi, Amin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26440232
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.166443
_version_ 1782434013926916096
author Ghanei, Mostafa
Aliannejad, Rasoul
Mazloumi, Mahdi
Saburi, Amin
author_facet Ghanei, Mostafa
Aliannejad, Rasoul
Mazloumi, Mahdi
Saburi, Amin
author_sort Ghanei, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction is a condition in which the physical activity causes constriction of airways in patients with airway hyper- responsiveness. In this study, we tried to study and evaluate any relationship between the findings of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the response to methacholine challenge test (MCT) in patients with dyspnea after activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with complaints of dyspnea following activity referred to “Lung Clinic” of Baqiyatallah Hospital but not suffering from asthma were entered into the study. The subjects were excluded from the study if: Suffering from any other pulmonary diseases, smoking more than 1 cigarette a week in the last year, having a history of smoking more than 10 packets of cigarettes/year, having respiratory infection in the past 4 weeks, having abnormal chest X-ray or electrocardiogram, and cannot discontinue the use of medicines interfering with bronchial provocation. Baseline spirometry was performed for all the patients, and the values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV/FVC were recorded. The MCT and then the CPET were performed on all patients. RESULTS: The mean VO(2) (volume oxygen) in patients with positive methacholine test (20.45 mL/kg/min) was significantly lower than patients with negative MCT (28.69 mL/kg/min) (P = 0.000). Respiratory rates per minute (RR) and minute ventilation in the group with positive MCT (38.85 and 1.636 L) were significantly lower than the group with negative methacholine test (46.78 and 2.114 L) (P < 0.05). Also, the O(2) pulse rate in the group with negative methacholine test (116.27 mL/beat) was significantly higher than the group with positive methacholine test (84.26 mL/beat) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary response to exercise in patients with positive methacholine test is insufficient. The dead space ventilation in these patients has increased. Also, dynamic hyperinflation in patients with positive methacholine test causes the reduced stroke volume and O(2) pulse in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4881686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48816862016-06-16 Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test Ghanei, Mostafa Aliannejad, Rasoul Mazloumi, Mahdi Saburi, Amin Ann Card Anaesth Original Article INTRODUCTION: Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction is a condition in which the physical activity causes constriction of airways in patients with airway hyper- responsiveness. In this study, we tried to study and evaluate any relationship between the findings of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the response to methacholine challenge test (MCT) in patients with dyspnea after activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with complaints of dyspnea following activity referred to “Lung Clinic” of Baqiyatallah Hospital but not suffering from asthma were entered into the study. The subjects were excluded from the study if: Suffering from any other pulmonary diseases, smoking more than 1 cigarette a week in the last year, having a history of smoking more than 10 packets of cigarettes/year, having respiratory infection in the past 4 weeks, having abnormal chest X-ray or electrocardiogram, and cannot discontinue the use of medicines interfering with bronchial provocation. Baseline spirometry was performed for all the patients, and the values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV/FVC were recorded. The MCT and then the CPET were performed on all patients. RESULTS: The mean VO(2) (volume oxygen) in patients with positive methacholine test (20.45 mL/kg/min) was significantly lower than patients with negative MCT (28.69 mL/kg/min) (P = 0.000). Respiratory rates per minute (RR) and minute ventilation in the group with positive MCT (38.85 and 1.636 L) were significantly lower than the group with negative methacholine test (46.78 and 2.114 L) (P < 0.05). Also, the O(2) pulse rate in the group with negative methacholine test (116.27 mL/beat) was significantly higher than the group with positive methacholine test (84.26 mL/beat) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary response to exercise in patients with positive methacholine test is insufficient. The dead space ventilation in these patients has increased. Also, dynamic hyperinflation in patients with positive methacholine test causes the reduced stroke volume and O(2) pulse in these patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4881686/ /pubmed/26440232 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.166443 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghanei, Mostafa
Aliannejad, Rasoul
Mazloumi, Mahdi
Saburi, Amin
Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title_full Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title_fullStr Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title_full_unstemmed Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title_short Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: Comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
title_sort exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26440232
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.166443
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaneimostafa exertionalinducedbronchoconstrictioncomparisonbetweencardiopulmonaryexercisetestandmethacholinechallengingtest
AT aliannejadrasoul exertionalinducedbronchoconstrictioncomparisonbetweencardiopulmonaryexercisetestandmethacholinechallengingtest
AT mazloumimahdi exertionalinducedbronchoconstrictioncomparisonbetweencardiopulmonaryexercisetestandmethacholinechallengingtest
AT saburiamin exertionalinducedbronchoconstrictioncomparisonbetweencardiopulmonaryexercisetestandmethacholinechallengingtest