Cargando…

A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tshimanga, Mufuta, Mangwiro, Tonderayi, Mugurungi, Owen, Xaba, Sinokuthemba, Murwira, Munyaradzi, Kasprzyk, Danuta, Montaño, Daniel E., Nyamukapa, Daisy, Tambashe, Basile, Chatikobo, Pesanai, Gundidza, Patricia, Gwinji, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220
_version_ 1782434056711962624
author Tshimanga, Mufuta
Mangwiro, Tonderayi
Mugurungi, Owen
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Murwira, Munyaradzi
Kasprzyk, Danuta
Montaño, Daniel E.
Nyamukapa, Daisy
Tambashe, Basile
Chatikobo, Pesanai
Gundidza, Patricia
Gwinji, Gerald
author_facet Tshimanga, Mufuta
Mangwiro, Tonderayi
Mugurungi, Owen
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Murwira, Munyaradzi
Kasprzyk, Danuta
Montaño, Daniel E.
Nyamukapa, Daisy
Tambashe, Basile
Chatikobo, Pesanai
Gundidza, Patricia
Gwinji, Gerald
author_sort Tshimanga, Mufuta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be performed by 2015 to achieve optimal MC coverage, a new approach was needed. The primary objective of the current trial was to assess the performance (safety, procedure time, and cost) of the PrePex device compared to forceps-guided surgical circumcision. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label trial in Zimbabwe involved healthy, non-circumcised adult male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the PrePex device (n = 160) or surgical arm (n = 80). Three doctors and 4 nurses, all certified on both circumcision methods, performed the procedures. The PrePex device procedure involves a plastic ring with a rubber O-ring that necrotizes the foreskin to facilitate easy and minimally invasive removal. Total procedure time was the primary endpoint. Adverse event (AE) data were also gathered for 90 days post-procedure. All 80 participants in the surgical arm and 158 participants in the PrePex arm achieved complete circumcision. The total procedure time for the PrePex device was approximately one-third of the total surgical procedure (4.8 minutes, Standard Deviation [SD]: 1.2 versus 14.6 minutes; SD: 4.2; p<0.00001). There were 2 AEs for 2 participants (rate of 1.3%, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.0025–4.53%), which were resolved with simple intervention. The AEs were device related, including 1 case of pain leading to device removal and 1 case of removal of the device. CONCLUSIONS: The trial supports previous studies’ conclusions that the PrePex procedure is safe, quick, easy to apply, and effective in terms of procedure time as an alternative to traditional surgical circumcision. The PrePex device has great potential for use in overburdened health systems and in resource-limited settings and is recommended for use in rapid scale-up of adult MC in Zimbabwe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4881993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48819932016-06-10 A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe Tshimanga, Mufuta Mangwiro, Tonderayi Mugurungi, Owen Xaba, Sinokuthemba Murwira, Munyaradzi Kasprzyk, Danuta Montaño, Daniel E. Nyamukapa, Daisy Tambashe, Basile Chatikobo, Pesanai Gundidza, Patricia Gwinji, Gerald PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be performed by 2015 to achieve optimal MC coverage, a new approach was needed. The primary objective of the current trial was to assess the performance (safety, procedure time, and cost) of the PrePex device compared to forceps-guided surgical circumcision. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label trial in Zimbabwe involved healthy, non-circumcised adult male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the PrePex device (n = 160) or surgical arm (n = 80). Three doctors and 4 nurses, all certified on both circumcision methods, performed the procedures. The PrePex device procedure involves a plastic ring with a rubber O-ring that necrotizes the foreskin to facilitate easy and minimally invasive removal. Total procedure time was the primary endpoint. Adverse event (AE) data were also gathered for 90 days post-procedure. All 80 participants in the surgical arm and 158 participants in the PrePex arm achieved complete circumcision. The total procedure time for the PrePex device was approximately one-third of the total surgical procedure (4.8 minutes, Standard Deviation [SD]: 1.2 versus 14.6 minutes; SD: 4.2; p<0.00001). There were 2 AEs for 2 participants (rate of 1.3%, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.0025–4.53%), which were resolved with simple intervention. The AEs were device related, including 1 case of pain leading to device removal and 1 case of removal of the device. CONCLUSIONS: The trial supports previous studies’ conclusions that the PrePex procedure is safe, quick, easy to apply, and effective in terms of procedure time as an alternative to traditional surgical circumcision. The PrePex device has great potential for use in overburdened health systems and in resource-limited settings and is recommended for use in rapid scale-up of adult MC in Zimbabwe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370 Public Library of Science 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4881993/ /pubmed/27227679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220 Text en © 2016 Tshimanga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tshimanga, Mufuta
Mangwiro, Tonderayi
Mugurungi, Owen
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Murwira, Munyaradzi
Kasprzyk, Danuta
Montaño, Daniel E.
Nyamukapa, Daisy
Tambashe, Basile
Chatikobo, Pesanai
Gundidza, Patricia
Gwinji, Gerald
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title_full A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title_short A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
title_sort phase ii randomized controlled trial comparing safety, procedure time, and cost of the prepex™ device to forceps guided surgical circumcision in zimbabwe
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220
work_keys_str_mv AT tshimangamufuta aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT mangwirotonderayi aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT mugurungiowen aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT xabasinokuthemba aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT murwiramunyaradzi aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT kasprzykdanuta aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT montanodaniele aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT nyamukapadaisy aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT tambashebasile aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT chatikobopesanai aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT gundidzapatricia aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT gwinjigerald aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT tshimangamufuta phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT mangwirotonderayi phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT mugurungiowen phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT xabasinokuthemba phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT murwiramunyaradzi phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT kasprzykdanuta phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT montanodaniele phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT nyamukapadaisy phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT tambashebasile phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT chatikobopesanai phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT gundidzapatricia phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe
AT gwinjigerald phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe