Cargando…
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220 |
_version_ | 1782434056711962624 |
---|---|
author | Tshimanga, Mufuta Mangwiro, Tonderayi Mugurungi, Owen Xaba, Sinokuthemba Murwira, Munyaradzi Kasprzyk, Danuta Montaño, Daniel E. Nyamukapa, Daisy Tambashe, Basile Chatikobo, Pesanai Gundidza, Patricia Gwinji, Gerald |
author_facet | Tshimanga, Mufuta Mangwiro, Tonderayi Mugurungi, Owen Xaba, Sinokuthemba Murwira, Munyaradzi Kasprzyk, Danuta Montaño, Daniel E. Nyamukapa, Daisy Tambashe, Basile Chatikobo, Pesanai Gundidza, Patricia Gwinji, Gerald |
author_sort | Tshimanga, Mufuta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be performed by 2015 to achieve optimal MC coverage, a new approach was needed. The primary objective of the current trial was to assess the performance (safety, procedure time, and cost) of the PrePex device compared to forceps-guided surgical circumcision. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label trial in Zimbabwe involved healthy, non-circumcised adult male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the PrePex device (n = 160) or surgical arm (n = 80). Three doctors and 4 nurses, all certified on both circumcision methods, performed the procedures. The PrePex device procedure involves a plastic ring with a rubber O-ring that necrotizes the foreskin to facilitate easy and minimally invasive removal. Total procedure time was the primary endpoint. Adverse event (AE) data were also gathered for 90 days post-procedure. All 80 participants in the surgical arm and 158 participants in the PrePex arm achieved complete circumcision. The total procedure time for the PrePex device was approximately one-third of the total surgical procedure (4.8 minutes, Standard Deviation [SD]: 1.2 versus 14.6 minutes; SD: 4.2; p<0.00001). There were 2 AEs for 2 participants (rate of 1.3%, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.0025–4.53%), which were resolved with simple intervention. The AEs were device related, including 1 case of pain leading to device removal and 1 case of removal of the device. CONCLUSIONS: The trial supports previous studies’ conclusions that the PrePex procedure is safe, quick, easy to apply, and effective in terms of procedure time as an alternative to traditional surgical circumcision. The PrePex device has great potential for use in overburdened health systems and in resource-limited settings and is recommended for use in rapid scale-up of adult MC in Zimbabwe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4881993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48819932016-06-10 A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe Tshimanga, Mufuta Mangwiro, Tonderayi Mugurungi, Owen Xaba, Sinokuthemba Murwira, Munyaradzi Kasprzyk, Danuta Montaño, Daniel E. Nyamukapa, Daisy Tambashe, Basile Chatikobo, Pesanai Gundidza, Patricia Gwinji, Gerald PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be performed by 2015 to achieve optimal MC coverage, a new approach was needed. The primary objective of the current trial was to assess the performance (safety, procedure time, and cost) of the PrePex device compared to forceps-guided surgical circumcision. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label trial in Zimbabwe involved healthy, non-circumcised adult male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the PrePex device (n = 160) or surgical arm (n = 80). Three doctors and 4 nurses, all certified on both circumcision methods, performed the procedures. The PrePex device procedure involves a plastic ring with a rubber O-ring that necrotizes the foreskin to facilitate easy and minimally invasive removal. Total procedure time was the primary endpoint. Adverse event (AE) data were also gathered for 90 days post-procedure. All 80 participants in the surgical arm and 158 participants in the PrePex arm achieved complete circumcision. The total procedure time for the PrePex device was approximately one-third of the total surgical procedure (4.8 minutes, Standard Deviation [SD]: 1.2 versus 14.6 minutes; SD: 4.2; p<0.00001). There were 2 AEs for 2 participants (rate of 1.3%, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.0025–4.53%), which were resolved with simple intervention. The AEs were device related, including 1 case of pain leading to device removal and 1 case of removal of the device. CONCLUSIONS: The trial supports previous studies’ conclusions that the PrePex procedure is safe, quick, easy to apply, and effective in terms of procedure time as an alternative to traditional surgical circumcision. The PrePex device has great potential for use in overburdened health systems and in resource-limited settings and is recommended for use in rapid scale-up of adult MC in Zimbabwe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370 Public Library of Science 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4881993/ /pubmed/27227679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220 Text en © 2016 Tshimanga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tshimanga, Mufuta Mangwiro, Tonderayi Mugurungi, Owen Xaba, Sinokuthemba Murwira, Munyaradzi Kasprzyk, Danuta Montaño, Daniel E. Nyamukapa, Daisy Tambashe, Basile Chatikobo, Pesanai Gundidza, Patricia Gwinji, Gerald A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title | A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title_full | A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title_fullStr | A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title_short | A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe |
title_sort | phase ii randomized controlled trial comparing safety, procedure time, and cost of the prepex™ device to forceps guided surgical circumcision in zimbabwe |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tshimangamufuta aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT mangwirotonderayi aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT mugurungiowen aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT xabasinokuthemba aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT murwiramunyaradzi aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT kasprzykdanuta aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT montanodaniele aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT nyamukapadaisy aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT tambashebasile aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT chatikobopesanai aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT gundidzapatricia aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT gwinjigerald aphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT tshimangamufuta phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT mangwirotonderayi phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT mugurungiowen phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT xabasinokuthemba phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT murwiramunyaradzi phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT kasprzykdanuta phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT montanodaniele phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT nyamukapadaisy phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT tambashebasile phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT chatikobopesanai phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT gundidzapatricia phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe AT gwinjigerald phaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsafetyproceduretimeandcostoftheprepexdevicetoforcepsguidedsurgicalcircumcisioninzimbabwe |