Cargando…

Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution and removal dynamics of the main fluorophores during dialysis by analyzing the spent dialysate samples to prove the hypothesis whether the fluorescence of spent dialysate can be utilized for monitoring removal of any of the protein bound uremic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arund, Jürgen, Luman, Merike, Uhlin, Fredrik, Tanner, Risto, Fridolin, Ivo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156541
_version_ 1782434074491617280
author Arund, Jürgen
Luman, Merike
Uhlin, Fredrik
Tanner, Risto
Fridolin, Ivo
author_facet Arund, Jürgen
Luman, Merike
Uhlin, Fredrik
Tanner, Risto
Fridolin, Ivo
author_sort Arund, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution and removal dynamics of the main fluorophores during dialysis by analyzing the spent dialysate samples to prove the hypothesis whether the fluorescence of spent dialysate can be utilized for monitoring removal of any of the protein bound uremic solute. A high performance liquid chromatography system was used to separate and quantify fluorophoric solutes in the spent dialysate sampled at the start and the end of 99 dialysis sessions, including 57 hemodialysis and 42 hemodiafiltration treatments. Fluorescence was acquired at excitation 280 nm and emission 360 nm. The main fluorophores found in samples were identified as indole derivatives: tryptophan, indoxyl glucuronide, indoxyl sulfate, 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid, indoleacetyl glutamine, and indoleacetic acid. The highest contribution (35 ± 11%) was found to arise from indoxyl sulfate. Strong correlation between contribution values at the start and end of dialysis (R(2) = 0.90) indicated to the stable contribution during the course of the dialysis. The reduction ratio of indoxyl sulfate was very close to the decrease of the total fluorescence signal of the spent dialysate (49 ± 14% vs 51 ± 13% respectively, P = 0.30, N = 99) and there was strong correlation between these reduction ratio values (R(2) = 0.86). On-line fluorescence measurements were carried out to illustrate the technological possibility for real-time dialysis fluorescence monitoring reflecting the removal of the main fluorophores from blood into spent dialysate. In summary, since a predominant part of the fluorescence signal at excitation 280 nm and emission 360 nm in the spent dialysate originates from protein bound derivatives of indoles, metabolites of tryptophan and indole, the fluorescence signal at this wavelength region has high potential to be utilized for monitoring the removal of slowly dialyzed uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48820712016-06-10 Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis? Arund, Jürgen Luman, Merike Uhlin, Fredrik Tanner, Risto Fridolin, Ivo PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution and removal dynamics of the main fluorophores during dialysis by analyzing the spent dialysate samples to prove the hypothesis whether the fluorescence of spent dialysate can be utilized for monitoring removal of any of the protein bound uremic solute. A high performance liquid chromatography system was used to separate and quantify fluorophoric solutes in the spent dialysate sampled at the start and the end of 99 dialysis sessions, including 57 hemodialysis and 42 hemodiafiltration treatments. Fluorescence was acquired at excitation 280 nm and emission 360 nm. The main fluorophores found in samples were identified as indole derivatives: tryptophan, indoxyl glucuronide, indoxyl sulfate, 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid, indoleacetyl glutamine, and indoleacetic acid. The highest contribution (35 ± 11%) was found to arise from indoxyl sulfate. Strong correlation between contribution values at the start and end of dialysis (R(2) = 0.90) indicated to the stable contribution during the course of the dialysis. The reduction ratio of indoxyl sulfate was very close to the decrease of the total fluorescence signal of the spent dialysate (49 ± 14% vs 51 ± 13% respectively, P = 0.30, N = 99) and there was strong correlation between these reduction ratio values (R(2) = 0.86). On-line fluorescence measurements were carried out to illustrate the technological possibility for real-time dialysis fluorescence monitoring reflecting the removal of the main fluorophores from blood into spent dialysate. In summary, since a predominant part of the fluorescence signal at excitation 280 nm and emission 360 nm in the spent dialysate originates from protein bound derivatives of indoles, metabolites of tryptophan and indole, the fluorescence signal at this wavelength region has high potential to be utilized for monitoring the removal of slowly dialyzed uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate. Public Library of Science 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4882071/ /pubmed/27228162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156541 Text en © 2016 Arund et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arund, Jürgen
Luman, Merike
Uhlin, Fredrik
Tanner, Risto
Fridolin, Ivo
Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title_full Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title_fullStr Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title_full_unstemmed Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title_short Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis?
title_sort is fluorescence valid to monitor removal of protein bound uremic solutes in dialysis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156541
work_keys_str_mv AT arundjurgen isfluorescencevalidtomonitorremovalofproteinbounduremicsolutesindialysis
AT lumanmerike isfluorescencevalidtomonitorremovalofproteinbounduremicsolutesindialysis
AT uhlinfredrik isfluorescencevalidtomonitorremovalofproteinbounduremicsolutesindialysis
AT tannerristo isfluorescencevalidtomonitorremovalofproteinbounduremicsolutesindialysis
AT fridolinivo isfluorescencevalidtomonitorremovalofproteinbounduremicsolutesindialysis