Cargando…

Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival

OBJECTIVES: Our primary goal is to investigate the hypothesis that in patients with a detectable ventricular wall motion (VWM) in cardiac ultrasonography (US) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rate is significantly more than in patients without VWM in US. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozen, Can, Salcin, Emre, Akoglu, Haldun, Onur, Ozge, Denizbasi, Arzu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2015.08.001
_version_ 1782434085558288384
author Ozen, Can
Salcin, Emre
Akoglu, Haldun
Onur, Ozge
Denizbasi, Arzu
author_facet Ozen, Can
Salcin, Emre
Akoglu, Haldun
Onur, Ozge
Denizbasi, Arzu
author_sort Ozen, Can
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our primary goal is to investigate the hypothesis that in patients with a detectable ventricular wall motion (VWM) in cardiac ultrasonography (US) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rate is significantly more than in patients without VWM in US. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our prospective, single center study, 129 adult cardiac arrest (CA) patients were enrolled. Cardiac US according to Focus Assessed Transthoracic Echo (FATE) protocol was performed before CPR. Presence of VWM was recorded on forms along with demographic data, initial rhythm, CA location, presence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and time until ROSC was obtained. RESULTS: 129 patients were included. ROSC was obtained in 56/77 (72.7%) patients with VWM and 3/52 (5.8%) patients without VWM which is statistically significant (p > 0.001). Presence of VWM is 95% (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) sensitive and 70% (95% CI: 0.58–0.80) specific for ROSC. 43/77 (55.8%) patients with VWM and 1 (1.9%) of 52 patients without VWM survived to hospital admission which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Presence of VWM was 100% (95% CI: 0.87–1.00) sensitive and 54% (95% CI: 0.43–0.64) specific for survival to hospital admission. CONCLUSION: No patient without VWM in US survived to hospital discharge. Only 3 had ROSC in emergency department and only 1 survived to hospital admission. This data suggests no patient without VWM before the onset of CPR survived to hospital discharge and this may be an indication to end resuscitative efforts early in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48822092016-05-27 Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival Ozen, Can Salcin, Emre Akoglu, Haldun Onur, Ozge Denizbasi, Arzu Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Our primary goal is to investigate the hypothesis that in patients with a detectable ventricular wall motion (VWM) in cardiac ultrasonography (US) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rate is significantly more than in patients without VWM in US. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our prospective, single center study, 129 adult cardiac arrest (CA) patients were enrolled. Cardiac US according to Focus Assessed Transthoracic Echo (FATE) protocol was performed before CPR. Presence of VWM was recorded on forms along with demographic data, initial rhythm, CA location, presence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and time until ROSC was obtained. RESULTS: 129 patients were included. ROSC was obtained in 56/77 (72.7%) patients with VWM and 3/52 (5.8%) patients without VWM which is statistically significant (p > 0.001). Presence of VWM is 95% (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) sensitive and 70% (95% CI: 0.58–0.80) specific for ROSC. 43/77 (55.8%) patients with VWM and 1 (1.9%) of 52 patients without VWM survived to hospital admission which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Presence of VWM was 100% (95% CI: 0.87–1.00) sensitive and 54% (95% CI: 0.43–0.64) specific for survival to hospital admission. CONCLUSION: No patient without VWM in US survived to hospital discharge. Only 3 had ROSC in emergency department and only 1 survived to hospital admission. This data suggests no patient without VWM before the onset of CPR survived to hospital discharge and this may be an indication to end resuscitative efforts early in these patients. Elsevier 2016-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4882209/ /pubmed/27239632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2015.08.001 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Owner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozen, Can
Salcin, Emre
Akoglu, Haldun
Onur, Ozge
Denizbasi, Arzu
Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title_full Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title_fullStr Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title_short Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
title_sort assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2015.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT ozencan assessmentofventricularwallmotionwithfocusedechocardiographyduringcardiacarresttopredictsurvival
AT salcinemre assessmentofventricularwallmotionwithfocusedechocardiographyduringcardiacarresttopredictsurvival
AT akogluhaldun assessmentofventricularwallmotionwithfocusedechocardiographyduringcardiacarresttopredictsurvival
AT onurozge assessmentofventricularwallmotionwithfocusedechocardiographyduringcardiacarresttopredictsurvival
AT denizbasiarzu assessmentofventricularwallmotionwithfocusedechocardiographyduringcardiacarresttopredictsurvival