Cargando…

Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION: The long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium bromide is approved in many countries as maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium is available as a dry-powder formulation delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) and is now also approved as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calverley, Peter M. A., Könen-Bergmann, Michael, Richard, Frank, Bell, Susan, Hohlfeld, Jens M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0322-9
_version_ 1782434105208602624
author Calverley, Peter M. A.
Könen-Bergmann, Michael
Richard, Frank
Bell, Susan
Hohlfeld, Jens M.
author_facet Calverley, Peter M. A.
Könen-Bergmann, Michael
Richard, Frank
Bell, Susan
Hohlfeld, Jens M.
author_sort Calverley, Peter M. A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium bromide is approved in many countries as maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium is available as a dry-powder formulation delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) and is now also approved as an aqueous solution delivered via the Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler (5 μg once daily, 2 puffs of 2.5 µg). Several studies have compared the efficacy of tiotropium HandiHaler (18 μg once daily) with different doses of Respimat. We aimed to compare available bronchodilator efficacy data of once-daily Respimat 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µg, and HandiHaler 18 µg to investigate which dose of tiotropium delivered by Respimat is the closest match to tiotropium HandiHaler. METHODS: Evaluation of six clinical trials (duration from 3 weeks to 2–3 years) that included lung function measures (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s and trough forced vital capacity) as key outcomes. RESULTS: In the six trials, bronchodilator efficacy of Respimat 5 μg and HandiHaler 18 μg was similar; however, reduced bronchodilator efficacy was observed with lower doses of Respimat (1.25 and 2.5 μg). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of the marketed once-daily dose of Respimat 5 μg for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48823672016-06-21 Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials Calverley, Peter M. A. Könen-Bergmann, Michael Richard, Frank Bell, Susan Hohlfeld, Jens M. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium bromide is approved in many countries as maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium is available as a dry-powder formulation delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) and is now also approved as an aqueous solution delivered via the Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler (5 μg once daily, 2 puffs of 2.5 µg). Several studies have compared the efficacy of tiotropium HandiHaler (18 μg once daily) with different doses of Respimat. We aimed to compare available bronchodilator efficacy data of once-daily Respimat 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µg, and HandiHaler 18 µg to investigate which dose of tiotropium delivered by Respimat is the closest match to tiotropium HandiHaler. METHODS: Evaluation of six clinical trials (duration from 3 weeks to 2–3 years) that included lung function measures (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s and trough forced vital capacity) as key outcomes. RESULTS: In the six trials, bronchodilator efficacy of Respimat 5 μg and HandiHaler 18 μg was similar; however, reduced bronchodilator efficacy was observed with lower doses of Respimat (1.25 and 2.5 μg). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of the marketed once-daily dose of Respimat 5 μg for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim. Springer Healthcare 2016-03-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4882367/ /pubmed/27084728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0322-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Calverley, Peter M. A.
Könen-Bergmann, Michael
Richard, Frank
Bell, Susan
Hohlfeld, Jens M.
Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title_full Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title_short Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials
title_sort tiotropium respimat(®) versus handihaler(®): comparison of bronchodilator efficacy of various doses in clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0322-9
work_keys_str_mv AT calverleypeterma tiotropiumrespimatversushandihalercomparisonofbronchodilatorefficacyofvariousdosesinclinicaltrials
AT konenbergmannmichael tiotropiumrespimatversushandihalercomparisonofbronchodilatorefficacyofvariousdosesinclinicaltrials
AT richardfrank tiotropiumrespimatversushandihalercomparisonofbronchodilatorefficacyofvariousdosesinclinicaltrials
AT bellsusan tiotropiumrespimatversushandihalercomparisonofbronchodilatorefficacyofvariousdosesinclinicaltrials
AT hohlfeldjensm tiotropiumrespimatversushandihalercomparisonofbronchodilatorefficacyofvariousdosesinclinicaltrials