Cargando…

The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance

The purpose of this study was to compare kinetic differences of static balance between female dancers (D) with at least seven years of dance experience and female non-dancers (ND) who were typical college students. Participants were tested in single-leg stance. Both the dominant leg (DL) and non-dom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KILROY, ELISABETH A., CRABTREE, OLIVIA M., CROSBY, BRITTANY, PARKER, AMANDA, BARFIELD, WILLIAM R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293509
_version_ 1782434115734208512
author KILROY, ELISABETH A.
CRABTREE, OLIVIA M.
CROSBY, BRITTANY
PARKER, AMANDA
BARFIELD, WILLIAM R.
author_facet KILROY, ELISABETH A.
CRABTREE, OLIVIA M.
CROSBY, BRITTANY
PARKER, AMANDA
BARFIELD, WILLIAM R.
author_sort KILROY, ELISABETH A.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare kinetic differences of static balance between female dancers (D) with at least seven years of dance experience and female non-dancers (ND) who were typical college students. Participants were tested in single-leg stance. Both the dominant leg (DL) and non-dominant leg (NDL) were tested with the participants shod (S) and barefoot (BF). Kinetic variables (vertical, medio-lateral [ML], antero-posterior [AP] maximum ground reaction forces (GRF), and center of pressure (COP) ML and AP) were measured by a Bertec force platform at 1000 Hz with participants S and BF. Each subject’s stance was measured over 3 × 30-second intervals. No significant differences (p≥0.05) existed between groups for height, body mass, or age. Significant differences existed between groups for balance time, AP GRF in both BF and S conditions for both DL and NDL, and ML GRF in BF NDL and S DL and NDL conditions. D and ND in BF and S conditions with DL and NDL static stance demonstrate different AP and ML GRF when balancing over a 30-second time interval. Data may suggest that ND are more prone to lose their balance. Further investigation is warranted to understand whether individuals in the rehabilitative field and athletic populations can use dance therapy for injury prevention and rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48824622016-06-09 The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance KILROY, ELISABETH A. CRABTREE, OLIVIA M. CROSBY, BRITTANY PARKER, AMANDA BARFIELD, WILLIAM R. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research The purpose of this study was to compare kinetic differences of static balance between female dancers (D) with at least seven years of dance experience and female non-dancers (ND) who were typical college students. Participants were tested in single-leg stance. Both the dominant leg (DL) and non-dominant leg (NDL) were tested with the participants shod (S) and barefoot (BF). Kinetic variables (vertical, medio-lateral [ML], antero-posterior [AP] maximum ground reaction forces (GRF), and center of pressure (COP) ML and AP) were measured by a Bertec force platform at 1000 Hz with participants S and BF. Each subject’s stance was measured over 3 × 30-second intervals. No significant differences (p≥0.05) existed between groups for height, body mass, or age. Significant differences existed between groups for balance time, AP GRF in both BF and S conditions for both DL and NDL, and ML GRF in BF NDL and S DL and NDL conditions. D and ND in BF and S conditions with DL and NDL static stance demonstrate different AP and ML GRF when balancing over a 30-second time interval. Data may suggest that ND are more prone to lose their balance. Further investigation is warranted to understand whether individuals in the rehabilitative field and athletic populations can use dance therapy for injury prevention and rehabilitation. Berkeley Electronic Press 2016-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4882462/ /pubmed/27293509 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
KILROY, ELISABETH A.
CRABTREE, OLIVIA M.
CROSBY, BRITTANY
PARKER, AMANDA
BARFIELD, WILLIAM R.
The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title_full The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title_fullStr The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title_short The Effect of Single-Leg Stance on Dancer and Control Group Static Balance
title_sort effect of single-leg stance on dancer and control group static balance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293509
work_keys_str_mv AT kilroyelisabetha theeffectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT crabtreeoliviam theeffectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT crosbybrittany theeffectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT parkeramanda theeffectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT barfieldwilliamr theeffectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT kilroyelisabetha effectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT crabtreeoliviam effectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT crosbybrittany effectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT parkeramanda effectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance
AT barfieldwilliamr effectofsinglelegstanceondancerandcontrolgroupstaticbalance