Cargando…
Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicke...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622 |
_version_ | 1782434125023543296 |
---|---|
author | Cuperus, Tryntsje van Dijk, Albert Matthijs, Mieke G. R. Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A. Haagsman, Henk P. |
author_facet | Cuperus, Tryntsje van Dijk, Albert Matthijs, Mieke G. R. Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A. Haagsman, Henk P. |
author_sort | Cuperus, Tryntsje |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicken cathelicidin-2 (D-CATH-2) against a respiratory E. coli infection. Chickens were treated with D-CATH-2 in ovo at day 18 of embryonic development or intramuscularly at days 1 and 4 after hatch. At 7 days of age, birds were challenged intratracheally with avian pathogenic E. coli. Protection was evaluated by recording mortality, morbidity (Mean Lesion Score) and bacterial swabs of air sacs at 7 days post-infection. In ovo D-CATH-2 treatment significantly reduced morbidity (63%) and respiratory bacterial load (>90%), while intramuscular treatment was less effective. D-CATH-2 increased the percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes and heterophils by both administration routes. E. coli specific IgM levels were lower in in ovo treated animals compared to intramuscular D-CATH-2 treatment. In short, in ovo treatment with the Host Defense Peptide derived D-CATH-2 can partially protect chickens from E. coli infection, making this peptide an interesting starting point to develop alternatives to antibiotics for use in the poultry sector. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4882517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48825172016-06-08 Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli Cuperus, Tryntsje van Dijk, Albert Matthijs, Mieke G. R. Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A. Haagsman, Henk P. Sci Rep Article Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicken cathelicidin-2 (D-CATH-2) against a respiratory E. coli infection. Chickens were treated with D-CATH-2 in ovo at day 18 of embryonic development or intramuscularly at days 1 and 4 after hatch. At 7 days of age, birds were challenged intratracheally with avian pathogenic E. coli. Protection was evaluated by recording mortality, morbidity (Mean Lesion Score) and bacterial swabs of air sacs at 7 days post-infection. In ovo D-CATH-2 treatment significantly reduced morbidity (63%) and respiratory bacterial load (>90%), while intramuscular treatment was less effective. D-CATH-2 increased the percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes and heterophils by both administration routes. E. coli specific IgM levels were lower in in ovo treated animals compared to intramuscular D-CATH-2 treatment. In short, in ovo treatment with the Host Defense Peptide derived D-CATH-2 can partially protect chickens from E. coli infection, making this peptide an interesting starting point to develop alternatives to antibiotics for use in the poultry sector. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4882517/ /pubmed/27229866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Cuperus, Tryntsje van Dijk, Albert Matthijs, Mieke G. R. Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A. Haagsman, Henk P. Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title | Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title_full | Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title_fullStr | Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title_full_unstemmed | Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title_short | Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli |
title_sort | protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog d-cath-2 against avian pathogenic e. coli |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuperustryntsje protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli AT vandijkalbert protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli AT matthijsmiekegr protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli AT veldhuizenedwinja protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli AT haagsmanhenkp protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli |