Cargando…

Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli

Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuperus, Tryntsje, van Dijk, Albert, Matthijs, Mieke G. R., Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A., Haagsman, Henk P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622
_version_ 1782434125023543296
author Cuperus, Tryntsje
van Dijk, Albert
Matthijs, Mieke G. R.
Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A.
Haagsman, Henk P.
author_facet Cuperus, Tryntsje
van Dijk, Albert
Matthijs, Mieke G. R.
Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A.
Haagsman, Henk P.
author_sort Cuperus, Tryntsje
collection PubMed
description Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicken cathelicidin-2 (D-CATH-2) against a respiratory E. coli infection. Chickens were treated with D-CATH-2 in ovo at day 18 of embryonic development or intramuscularly at days 1 and 4 after hatch. At 7 days of age, birds were challenged intratracheally with avian pathogenic E. coli. Protection was evaluated by recording mortality, morbidity (Mean Lesion Score) and bacterial swabs of air sacs at 7 days post-infection. In ovo D-CATH-2 treatment significantly reduced morbidity (63%) and respiratory bacterial load (>90%), while intramuscular treatment was less effective. D-CATH-2 increased the percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes and heterophils by both administration routes. E. coli specific IgM levels were lower in in ovo treated animals compared to intramuscular D-CATH-2 treatment. In short, in ovo treatment with the Host Defense Peptide derived D-CATH-2 can partially protect chickens from E. coli infection, making this peptide an interesting starting point to develop alternatives to antibiotics for use in the poultry sector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48825172016-06-08 Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli Cuperus, Tryntsje van Dijk, Albert Matthijs, Mieke G. R. Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A. Haagsman, Henk P. Sci Rep Article Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicken cathelicidin-2 (D-CATH-2) against a respiratory E. coli infection. Chickens were treated with D-CATH-2 in ovo at day 18 of embryonic development or intramuscularly at days 1 and 4 after hatch. At 7 days of age, birds were challenged intratracheally with avian pathogenic E. coli. Protection was evaluated by recording mortality, morbidity (Mean Lesion Score) and bacterial swabs of air sacs at 7 days post-infection. In ovo D-CATH-2 treatment significantly reduced morbidity (63%) and respiratory bacterial load (>90%), while intramuscular treatment was less effective. D-CATH-2 increased the percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes and heterophils by both administration routes. E. coli specific IgM levels were lower in in ovo treated animals compared to intramuscular D-CATH-2 treatment. In short, in ovo treatment with the Host Defense Peptide derived D-CATH-2 can partially protect chickens from E. coli infection, making this peptide an interesting starting point to develop alternatives to antibiotics for use in the poultry sector. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4882517/ /pubmed/27229866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Cuperus, Tryntsje
van Dijk, Albert
Matthijs, Mieke G. R.
Veldhuizen, Edwin J. A.
Haagsman, Henk P.
Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title_full Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title_fullStr Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title_full_unstemmed Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title_short Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli
title_sort protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog d-cath-2 against avian pathogenic e. coli
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26622
work_keys_str_mv AT cuperustryntsje protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli
AT vandijkalbert protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli
AT matthijsmiekegr protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli
AT veldhuizenedwinja protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli
AT haagsmanhenkp protectiveeffectofinovotreatmentwiththechickencathelicidinanalogdcath2againstavianpathogenicecoli