Cargando…

Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes

The carbohydrate (CHO) concentration of a mouth rinsing solution might influence the CHO sensing receptors in the mouth, with consequent activation of brain regions involved in reward, motivation and regulation of motor activity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of maltode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay, Koşar, Şükran Nazan, Bulut, Suleyman, Güzel, Yasemin, Willems, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus, Hazir, Tahir, Turnagöl, Hüseyin Hüsrev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050269
_version_ 1782434153969483776
author Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay
Koşar, Şükran Nazan
Bulut, Suleyman
Güzel, Yasemin
Willems, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus
Hazir, Tahir
Turnagöl, Hüseyin Hüsrev
author_facet Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay
Koşar, Şükran Nazan
Bulut, Suleyman
Güzel, Yasemin
Willems, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus
Hazir, Tahir
Turnagöl, Hüseyin Hüsrev
author_sort Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay
collection PubMed
description The carbohydrate (CHO) concentration of a mouth rinsing solution might influence the CHO sensing receptors in the mouth, with consequent activation of brain regions involved in reward, motivation and regulation of motor activity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of maltodextrin mouth rinsing with different concentrations (3%, 6% and 12%) after an overnight fast on a 20 km cycling time trial performance. Nine recreationally active, healthy males (age: 24 ± 2 years; [Formula: see text]: 47 ± 5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) participated in this study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study was conducted. Participants mouth-rinsed every 2.5 km for 5 s. Maltodextrin mouth rinse with concentrations of 3%, 6% or 12% did not change time to complete the time trial and power output compared to placebo (p > 0.05). Time trial completion times were 40.2 ± 4.0, 40.1 ± 3.9, 40.1 ± 4.4, and 39.3 ± 4.2 min and power output 205 ± 22, 206 ± 25, 210 ± 24, and 205 ± 23 W for placebo, 3%, 6%, and 12% maltodextrin conditions, respectively. Heart rate, lactate, glucose, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ between trials (p > 0.05). In conclusion, mouth rinsing with different maltodextrin concentrations after an overnight fast did not affect the physiological responses and performance during a 20 km cycling time trial in recreationally active males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48826822016-05-27 Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay Koşar, Şükran Nazan Bulut, Suleyman Güzel, Yasemin Willems, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus Hazir, Tahir Turnagöl, Hüseyin Hüsrev Nutrients Article The carbohydrate (CHO) concentration of a mouth rinsing solution might influence the CHO sensing receptors in the mouth, with consequent activation of brain regions involved in reward, motivation and regulation of motor activity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of maltodextrin mouth rinsing with different concentrations (3%, 6% and 12%) after an overnight fast on a 20 km cycling time trial performance. Nine recreationally active, healthy males (age: 24 ± 2 years; [Formula: see text]: 47 ± 5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) participated in this study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study was conducted. Participants mouth-rinsed every 2.5 km for 5 s. Maltodextrin mouth rinse with concentrations of 3%, 6% or 12% did not change time to complete the time trial and power output compared to placebo (p > 0.05). Time trial completion times were 40.2 ± 4.0, 40.1 ± 3.9, 40.1 ± 4.4, and 39.3 ± 4.2 min and power output 205 ± 22, 206 ± 25, 210 ± 24, and 205 ± 23 W for placebo, 3%, 6%, and 12% maltodextrin conditions, respectively. Heart rate, lactate, glucose, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ between trials (p > 0.05). In conclusion, mouth rinsing with different maltodextrin concentrations after an overnight fast did not affect the physiological responses and performance during a 20 km cycling time trial in recreationally active males. MDPI 2016-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4882682/ /pubmed/27171108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050269 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kulaksız, Tuğba Nilay
Koşar, Şükran Nazan
Bulut, Suleyman
Güzel, Yasemin
Willems, Marcus Elisabeth Theodorus
Hazir, Tahir
Turnagöl, Hüseyin Hüsrev
Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title_full Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title_fullStr Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title_short Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes
title_sort mouth rinsing with maltodextrin solutions fails to improve time trial endurance cycling performance in recreational athletes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050269
work_keys_str_mv AT kulaksıztugbanilay mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT kosarsukrannazan mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT bulutsuleyman mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT guzelyasemin mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT willemsmarcuselisabeththeodorus mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT hazirtahir mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes
AT turnagolhuseyinhusrev mouthrinsingwithmaltodextrinsolutionsfailstoimprovetimetrialendurancecyclingperformanceinrecreationalathletes