Cargando…

Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model

To further elaborate interactions between nutrition, gut microbiota and host health, an animal model to simulate changes in microbial composition and activity due to dietary changes similar to those in humans is needed. Therefore, the impact of two different diets on cecal and colonic microbial gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinritz, Sonja N., Weiss, Eva, Eklund, Meike, Aumiller, Tobias, Heyer, Charlotte M.E., Messner, Sabine, Rings, Andreas, Louis, Sandrine, Bischoff, Stephan C., Mosenthin, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27223303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050317
_version_ 1782434164546469888
author Heinritz, Sonja N.
Weiss, Eva
Eklund, Meike
Aumiller, Tobias
Heyer, Charlotte M.E.
Messner, Sabine
Rings, Andreas
Louis, Sandrine
Bischoff, Stephan C.
Mosenthin, Rainer
author_facet Heinritz, Sonja N.
Weiss, Eva
Eklund, Meike
Aumiller, Tobias
Heyer, Charlotte M.E.
Messner, Sabine
Rings, Andreas
Louis, Sandrine
Bischoff, Stephan C.
Mosenthin, Rainer
author_sort Heinritz, Sonja N.
collection PubMed
description To further elaborate interactions between nutrition, gut microbiota and host health, an animal model to simulate changes in microbial composition and activity due to dietary changes similar to those in humans is needed. Therefore, the impact of two different diets on cecal and colonic microbial gene copies and metabolic activity, organ development and biochemical parameters in blood serum was investigated using a pig model. Four pigs were either fed a low-fat/high-fiber (LF), or a high-fat/low-fiber (HF) diet for seven weeks, with both diets being isocaloric. A hypotrophic effect of the HF diet on digestive organs could be observed compared to the LF diet (p < 0.05). Higher gene copy numbers of Bacteroides (p < 0.05) and Enterobacteriaceae (p < 0.001) were present in intestinal contents of HF pigs, bifidobacteria were more abundant in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Concentrations of acetate and butyrate were higher in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Glucose was higher in HF pigs, while glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) showed higher concentrations upon feeding the LF diet (p < 0.001). However, C-reactive protein (CRP) decreased with time in LF pigs (p < 0.05). In part, these findings correspond to those in humans, and are in support of the concept of using the pig as human model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48827292016-05-27 Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model Heinritz, Sonja N. Weiss, Eva Eklund, Meike Aumiller, Tobias Heyer, Charlotte M.E. Messner, Sabine Rings, Andreas Louis, Sandrine Bischoff, Stephan C. Mosenthin, Rainer Nutrients Article To further elaborate interactions between nutrition, gut microbiota and host health, an animal model to simulate changes in microbial composition and activity due to dietary changes similar to those in humans is needed. Therefore, the impact of two different diets on cecal and colonic microbial gene copies and metabolic activity, organ development and biochemical parameters in blood serum was investigated using a pig model. Four pigs were either fed a low-fat/high-fiber (LF), or a high-fat/low-fiber (HF) diet for seven weeks, with both diets being isocaloric. A hypotrophic effect of the HF diet on digestive organs could be observed compared to the LF diet (p < 0.05). Higher gene copy numbers of Bacteroides (p < 0.05) and Enterobacteriaceae (p < 0.001) were present in intestinal contents of HF pigs, bifidobacteria were more abundant in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Concentrations of acetate and butyrate were higher in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Glucose was higher in HF pigs, while glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) showed higher concentrations upon feeding the LF diet (p < 0.001). However, C-reactive protein (CRP) decreased with time in LF pigs (p < 0.05). In part, these findings correspond to those in humans, and are in support of the concept of using the pig as human model. MDPI 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4882729/ /pubmed/27223303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050317 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heinritz, Sonja N.
Weiss, Eva
Eklund, Meike
Aumiller, Tobias
Heyer, Charlotte M.E.
Messner, Sabine
Rings, Andreas
Louis, Sandrine
Bischoff, Stephan C.
Mosenthin, Rainer
Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title_full Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title_fullStr Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title_short Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model
title_sort impact of a high-fat or high-fiber diet on intestinal microbiota and metabolic markers in a pig model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27223303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8050317
work_keys_str_mv AT heinritzsonjan impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT weisseva impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT eklundmeike impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT aumillertobias impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT heyercharlotteme impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT messnersabine impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT ringsandreas impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT louissandrine impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT bischoffstephanc impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel
AT mosenthinrainer impactofahighfatorhighfiberdietonintestinalmicrobiotaandmetabolicmarkersinapigmodel