Cargando…
Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7 |
_version_ | 1782434183909474304 |
---|---|
author | Sumpter, Colin McGill, Elizabeth Dickie, Esther Champo, Enes Romeri, Ester Egan, Matt |
author_facet | Sumpter, Colin McGill, Elizabeth Dickie, Esther Champo, Enes Romeri, Ester Egan, Matt |
author_sort | Sumpter, Colin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and why retailers choose or refuse to self-impose restrictions on alcohol sales in this way. METHODS: Mixed method assessment of retailers’ participation in Reducing the Strength in two London (UK) local authorities. Compliance rates and the cheapest available unit of alcohol at each store were assessed. Qualitative interviews with retailer managers and staff (n = 39) explored attitudes towards the intervention and perceptions of its impacts. RESULTS: Shops selling super-strength across both areas fell from 78 to 25 (18 % of all off-licences). The median price of the cheapest unit of alcohol available across all retailers increased from £0.29 to £0.33 and in shops that participated in Reducing the Strength it rose from £0.33 to £0.43. The project received a mixed response from retailers. Retailers said they participated to deter disruptive customers, reduce neighbourhood disruptions and to maintain a good relationship with the local authority. Reducing the Strength participants and non-participants expressed concern about its perceived financial impact due to customers shopping elsewhere for super-strength. Some felt that customers’ ability to circumvent the intervention would limit its effectiveness and that a larger scale compulsory approach would be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the Strength can achieve high rates of voluntary compliance, reduce availability of super-strength and raise the price of the cheapest available unit of alcohol in participating shops. Questions remain over the extent to which voluntary interventions of this type can achieve wider social or health goals if non-participating shops attract customers from those who participate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4882838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48828382016-05-28 Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities Sumpter, Colin McGill, Elizabeth Dickie, Esther Champo, Enes Romeri, Ester Egan, Matt BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and why retailers choose or refuse to self-impose restrictions on alcohol sales in this way. METHODS: Mixed method assessment of retailers’ participation in Reducing the Strength in two London (UK) local authorities. Compliance rates and the cheapest available unit of alcohol at each store were assessed. Qualitative interviews with retailer managers and staff (n = 39) explored attitudes towards the intervention and perceptions of its impacts. RESULTS: Shops selling super-strength across both areas fell from 78 to 25 (18 % of all off-licences). The median price of the cheapest unit of alcohol available across all retailers increased from £0.29 to £0.33 and in shops that participated in Reducing the Strength it rose from £0.33 to £0.43. The project received a mixed response from retailers. Retailers said they participated to deter disruptive customers, reduce neighbourhood disruptions and to maintain a good relationship with the local authority. Reducing the Strength participants and non-participants expressed concern about its perceived financial impact due to customers shopping elsewhere for super-strength. Some felt that customers’ ability to circumvent the intervention would limit its effectiveness and that a larger scale compulsory approach would be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the Strength can achieve high rates of voluntary compliance, reduce availability of super-strength and raise the price of the cheapest available unit of alcohol in participating shops. Questions remain over the extent to which voluntary interventions of this type can achieve wider social or health goals if non-participating shops attract customers from those who participate. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4882838/ /pubmed/27230466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7 Text en © Sumpter et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sumpter, Colin McGill, Elizabeth Dickie, Esther Champo, Enes Romeri, Ester Egan, Matt Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title | Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title_full | Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title_fullStr | Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title_short | Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities |
title_sort | reducing the strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two uk local authorities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sumptercolin reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities AT mcgillelizabeth reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities AT dickieesther reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities AT champoenes reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities AT romeriester reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities AT eganmatt reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities |