Cargando…

Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities

BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumpter, Colin, McGill, Elizabeth, Dickie, Esther, Champo, Enes, Romeri, Ester, Egan, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7
_version_ 1782434183909474304
author Sumpter, Colin
McGill, Elizabeth
Dickie, Esther
Champo, Enes
Romeri, Ester
Egan, Matt
author_facet Sumpter, Colin
McGill, Elizabeth
Dickie, Esther
Champo, Enes
Romeri, Ester
Egan, Matt
author_sort Sumpter, Colin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and why retailers choose or refuse to self-impose restrictions on alcohol sales in this way. METHODS: Mixed method assessment of retailers’ participation in Reducing the Strength in two London (UK) local authorities. Compliance rates and the cheapest available unit of alcohol at each store were assessed. Qualitative interviews with retailer managers and staff (n = 39) explored attitudes towards the intervention and perceptions of its impacts. RESULTS: Shops selling super-strength across both areas fell from 78 to 25 (18 % of all off-licences). The median price of the cheapest unit of alcohol available across all retailers increased from £0.29 to £0.33 and in shops that participated in Reducing the Strength it rose from £0.33 to £0.43. The project received a mixed response from retailers. Retailers said they participated to deter disruptive customers, reduce neighbourhood disruptions and to maintain a good relationship with the local authority. Reducing the Strength participants and non-participants expressed concern about its perceived financial impact due to customers shopping elsewhere for super-strength. Some felt that customers’ ability to circumvent the intervention would limit its effectiveness and that a larger scale compulsory approach would be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the Strength can achieve high rates of voluntary compliance, reduce availability of super-strength and raise the price of the cheapest available unit of alcohol in participating shops. Questions remain over the extent to which voluntary interventions of this type can achieve wider social or health goals if non-participating shops attract customers from those who participate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48828382016-05-28 Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities Sumpter, Colin McGill, Elizabeth Dickie, Esther Champo, Enes Romeri, Ester Egan, Matt BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing the Strength is an increasingly popular intervention in which local authorities ask retailers to stop selling ‘super-strength’ beers and ciders. The intervention cannot affect alcohol availability, nor consumption, unless retailers participate. In this paper, we ask whether and why retailers choose or refuse to self-impose restrictions on alcohol sales in this way. METHODS: Mixed method assessment of retailers’ participation in Reducing the Strength in two London (UK) local authorities. Compliance rates and the cheapest available unit of alcohol at each store were assessed. Qualitative interviews with retailer managers and staff (n = 39) explored attitudes towards the intervention and perceptions of its impacts. RESULTS: Shops selling super-strength across both areas fell from 78 to 25 (18 % of all off-licences). The median price of the cheapest unit of alcohol available across all retailers increased from £0.29 to £0.33 and in shops that participated in Reducing the Strength it rose from £0.33 to £0.43. The project received a mixed response from retailers. Retailers said they participated to deter disruptive customers, reduce neighbourhood disruptions and to maintain a good relationship with the local authority. Reducing the Strength participants and non-participants expressed concern about its perceived financial impact due to customers shopping elsewhere for super-strength. Some felt that customers’ ability to circumvent the intervention would limit its effectiveness and that a larger scale compulsory approach would be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the Strength can achieve high rates of voluntary compliance, reduce availability of super-strength and raise the price of the cheapest available unit of alcohol in participating shops. Questions remain over the extent to which voluntary interventions of this type can achieve wider social or health goals if non-participating shops attract customers from those who participate. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4882838/ /pubmed/27230466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7 Text en © Sumpter et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sumpter, Colin
McGill, Elizabeth
Dickie, Esther
Champo, Enes
Romeri, Ester
Egan, Matt
Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title_full Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title_fullStr Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title_short Reducing the Strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two UK local authorities
title_sort reducing the strength: a mixed methods evaluation of alcohol retailers’ willingness to voluntarily reduce the availability of low cost, high strength beers and ciders in two uk local authorities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3117-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sumptercolin reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities
AT mcgillelizabeth reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities
AT dickieesther reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities
AT champoenes reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities
AT romeriester reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities
AT eganmatt reducingthestrengthamixedmethodsevaluationofalcoholretailerswillingnesstovoluntarilyreducetheavailabilityoflowcosthighstrengthbeersandcidersintwouklocalauthorities