Cargando…

A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university

BACKGROUND: Total smoking bans have been found to contribute positively to the health of non-smokers by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, and to enhance the likelihood of cessation among smokers. METHODS: Two cross-sectional electronic surveys of staff and students at a large Australian univer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, Sharyn, Hart, Ellen, Jancey, Jonine, Hallett, Jonathan, Crawford, Gemma, Portsmouth, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2090-7
_version_ 1782434190808055808
author Burns, Sharyn
Hart, Ellen
Jancey, Jonine
Hallett, Jonathan
Crawford, Gemma
Portsmouth, Linda
author_facet Burns, Sharyn
Hart, Ellen
Jancey, Jonine
Hallett, Jonathan
Crawford, Gemma
Portsmouth, Linda
author_sort Burns, Sharyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Total smoking bans have been found to contribute positively to the health of non-smokers by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, and to enhance the likelihood of cessation among smokers. METHODS: Two cross-sectional electronic surveys of staff and students at a large Australian university were conducted prior (n = 969) and 1 year post (n = 670) the implementation of a smoke free campus policy. Demographics, tobacco use, intention to quit, attitudes towards smoking and smoking restrictions and awareness of and attitudes towards the campus smoking policy were measured. RESULTS: Exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) reduced significantly (p < 0.001) one year after policy implementation. Smoking prevalence was similar at both time periods (T1 9.3 %; T2 8.4 %) and over half of smokers indicated they were planning to quit smoking in the future (T1 65.5 vs T2 62.3 %). There was a significant increase in positive responses to the statement the campus should be totally smoke free including all outdoor areas at T2 compared to T1 (T1 60.8 vs T2 71.4 %; p < 0.001), however respondents felt there should be places on campus for smokers to smoke (T1 53.6 vs T2 47 %; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a significant positive difference in exposure SHS after implementation of the total ban. Although prevalence of smoking in this study was low, the proportion of respondents who were contemplating smoking cessation suggests support for smokers would be beneficial. Continued awareness raising, education and enforcement is likely to enhance the long term outcomes of the total ban.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4882868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48828682016-05-28 A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university Burns, Sharyn Hart, Ellen Jancey, Jonine Hallett, Jonathan Crawford, Gemma Portsmouth, Linda BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Total smoking bans have been found to contribute positively to the health of non-smokers by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, and to enhance the likelihood of cessation among smokers. METHODS: Two cross-sectional electronic surveys of staff and students at a large Australian university were conducted prior (n = 969) and 1 year post (n = 670) the implementation of a smoke free campus policy. Demographics, tobacco use, intention to quit, attitudes towards smoking and smoking restrictions and awareness of and attitudes towards the campus smoking policy were measured. RESULTS: Exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) reduced significantly (p < 0.001) one year after policy implementation. Smoking prevalence was similar at both time periods (T1 9.3 %; T2 8.4 %) and over half of smokers indicated they were planning to quit smoking in the future (T1 65.5 vs T2 62.3 %). There was a significant increase in positive responses to the statement the campus should be totally smoke free including all outdoor areas at T2 compared to T1 (T1 60.8 vs T2 71.4 %; p < 0.001), however respondents felt there should be places on campus for smokers to smoke (T1 53.6 vs T2 47 %; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a significant positive difference in exposure SHS after implementation of the total ban. Although prevalence of smoking in this study was low, the proportion of respondents who were contemplating smoking cessation suggests support for smokers would be beneficial. Continued awareness raising, education and enforcement is likely to enhance the long term outcomes of the total ban. BioMed Central 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4882868/ /pubmed/27230617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2090-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burns, Sharyn
Hart, Ellen
Jancey, Jonine
Hallett, Jonathan
Crawford, Gemma
Portsmouth, Linda
A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title_full A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title_fullStr A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title_full_unstemmed A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title_short A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university
title_sort cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large australian university
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2090-7
work_keys_str_mv AT burnssharyn acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT hartellen acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT janceyjonine acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT hallettjonathan acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT crawfordgemma acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT portsmouthlinda acrosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT burnssharyn crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT hartellen crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT janceyjonine crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT hallettjonathan crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT crawfordgemma crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity
AT portsmouthlinda crosssectionalevaluationofatotalsmokingbanatalargeaustralianuniversity