Cargando…
On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0 |
_version_ | 1782434222789623808 |
---|---|
author | Batallones, Amy Sanchez, Kilby Mott, Brian Coffran, Cameron Frank Hsu, D. |
author_facet | Batallones, Amy Sanchez, Kilby Mott, Brian Coffran, Cameron Frank Hsu, D. |
author_sort | Batallones, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the individual systems, it is not known when and why this can happen. By extending a visual cognition system to become a scoring system based on each of the statistical means M (1), M (2), and M (3) respectively, the problem of combining visual cognition systems is transformed to the problem of combining multiple scoring systems. In this paper, we examine the combined results in terms of performance and diversity using combinatorial fusion, and study the issue of when and why a combined system can be better than individual systems. A data set from an experiment with twelve trials is analyzed. The findings demonstrated that combination of two visual cognition systems, based on weighted means M (2) or M (3), can improve each of the individual systems only when both of them have relatively good performance and they are diverse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4883159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48831592016-08-19 On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion Batallones, Amy Sanchez, Kilby Mott, Brian Coffran, Cameron Frank Hsu, D. Brain Inform Article When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the individual systems, it is not known when and why this can happen. By extending a visual cognition system to become a scoring system based on each of the statistical means M (1), M (2), and M (3) respectively, the problem of combining visual cognition systems is transformed to the problem of combining multiple scoring systems. In this paper, we examine the combined results in terms of performance and diversity using combinatorial fusion, and study the issue of when and why a combined system can be better than individual systems. A data set from an experiment with twelve trials is analyzed. The findings demonstrated that combination of two visual cognition systems, based on weighted means M (2) or M (3), can improve each of the individual systems only when both of them have relatively good performance and they are diverse. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4883159/ /pubmed/27747501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Batallones, Amy Sanchez, Kilby Mott, Brian Coffran, Cameron Frank Hsu, D. On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title | On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title_full | On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title_fullStr | On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title_short | On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
title_sort | on the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batallonesamy onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion AT sanchezkilby onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion AT mottbrian onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion AT coffrancameron onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion AT frankhsud onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion |