Cargando…

On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion

When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batallones, Amy, Sanchez, Kilby, Mott, Brian, Coffran, Cameron, Frank Hsu, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0
_version_ 1782434222789623808
author Batallones, Amy
Sanchez, Kilby
Mott, Brian
Coffran, Cameron
Frank Hsu, D.
author_facet Batallones, Amy
Sanchez, Kilby
Mott, Brian
Coffran, Cameron
Frank Hsu, D.
author_sort Batallones, Amy
collection PubMed
description When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the individual systems, it is not known when and why this can happen. By extending a visual cognition system to become a scoring system based on each of the statistical means M (1), M (2), and M (3) respectively, the problem of combining visual cognition systems is transformed to the problem of combining multiple scoring systems. In this paper, we examine the combined results in terms of performance and diversity using combinatorial fusion, and study the issue of when and why a combined system can be better than individual systems. A data set from an experiment with twelve trials is analyzed. The findings demonstrated that combination of two visual cognition systems, based on weighted means M (2) or M (3), can improve each of the individual systems only when both of them have relatively good performance and they are diverse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4883159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48831592016-08-19 On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion Batallones, Amy Sanchez, Kilby Mott, Brian Coffran, Cameron Frank Hsu, D. Brain Inform Article When combining decisions made by two separate visual cognition systems, statistical means such as simple average (M (1)) and weighted average (M (2) and M (3)), incorporating the confidence level of each of these systems have been used. Although combination using these means can improve each of the individual systems, it is not known when and why this can happen. By extending a visual cognition system to become a scoring system based on each of the statistical means M (1), M (2), and M (3) respectively, the problem of combining visual cognition systems is transformed to the problem of combining multiple scoring systems. In this paper, we examine the combined results in terms of performance and diversity using combinatorial fusion, and study the issue of when and why a combined system can be better than individual systems. A data set from an experiment with twelve trials is analyzed. The findings demonstrated that combination of two visual cognition systems, based on weighted means M (2) or M (3), can improve each of the individual systems only when both of them have relatively good performance and they are diverse. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4883159/ /pubmed/27747501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Batallones, Amy
Sanchez, Kilby
Mott, Brian
Coffran, Cameron
Frank Hsu, D.
On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title_full On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title_fullStr On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title_full_unstemmed On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title_short On the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
title_sort on the combination of two visual cognition systems using combinatorial fusion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0008-0
work_keys_str_mv AT batallonesamy onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion
AT sanchezkilby onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion
AT mottbrian onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion
AT coffrancameron onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion
AT frankhsud onthecombinationoftwovisualcognitionsystemsusingcombinatorialfusion