Cargando…

Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the response between subsequent use of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) with other mechanism of action (MOA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with history of anti-TNF tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergman, Martin J., Elkin, Eric P., Ogale, Sarika, Kamath, Tripthi, Hamburger, Max I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-014-0002-7
_version_ 1782434236847882240
author Bergman, Martin J.
Elkin, Eric P.
Ogale, Sarika
Kamath, Tripthi
Hamburger, Max I.
author_facet Bergman, Martin J.
Elkin, Eric P.
Ogale, Sarika
Kamath, Tripthi
Hamburger, Max I.
author_sort Bergman, Martin J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the response between subsequent use of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) with other mechanism of action (MOA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with history of anti-TNF treatment as their first bDMARD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at eight community-based rheumatology practices in the United States in 2012. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) response was measured by comparing baseline and 6-month scores. Poor response was defined as decrease <1.8 points, follow-up score >12, or treatment discontinuation before 6 months. Percentages of patients with good and good or moderate RAPID3 response were compared for second and third biologics. Multivariate models controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 176 patients whose charts were abstracted, 122 (69.3%) received another anti-TNF agent after they discontinued their first anti-TNF. RAPID3 scores were available for 160 patients. A patient receiving a second bDMARD with another MOA had a higher good or moderate response than a patient receiving anti-TNF (53.5 vs. 30.7%, p = 0.01). In the multivariate models, treatment with another MOA was more likely to produce a good RAPID3 response [odds ratio (OR), 2.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–5.58] or a good or moderate response (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.23–3.97) than treatment with an anti-TNF. CONCLUSION: In patients who have discontinued anti-TNF agents as their first bDMARD, RAPID3 response rates are better for those receiving agents with a different MOA rather than another anti-TNF. Physicians should consider using a bDMARD with a different MOA as the next bDMARD for RA patients whose anti-TNF agent has failed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-014-0002-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4883258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48832582016-08-19 Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis Bergman, Martin J. Elkin, Eric P. Ogale, Sarika Kamath, Tripthi Hamburger, Max I. Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the response between subsequent use of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) with other mechanism of action (MOA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with history of anti-TNF treatment as their first bDMARD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at eight community-based rheumatology practices in the United States in 2012. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) response was measured by comparing baseline and 6-month scores. Poor response was defined as decrease <1.8 points, follow-up score >12, or treatment discontinuation before 6 months. Percentages of patients with good and good or moderate RAPID3 response were compared for second and third biologics. Multivariate models controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 176 patients whose charts were abstracted, 122 (69.3%) received another anti-TNF agent after they discontinued their first anti-TNF. RAPID3 scores were available for 160 patients. A patient receiving a second bDMARD with another MOA had a higher good or moderate response than a patient receiving anti-TNF (53.5 vs. 30.7%, p = 0.01). In the multivariate models, treatment with another MOA was more likely to produce a good RAPID3 response [odds ratio (OR), 2.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–5.58] or a good or moderate response (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.23–3.97) than treatment with an anti-TNF. CONCLUSION: In patients who have discontinued anti-TNF agents as their first bDMARD, RAPID3 response rates are better for those receiving agents with a different MOA rather than another anti-TNF. Physicians should consider using a bDMARD with a different MOA as the next bDMARD for RA patients whose anti-TNF agent has failed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-014-0002-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4883258/ /pubmed/27747760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-014-0002-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bergman, Martin J.
Elkin, Eric P.
Ogale, Sarika
Kamath, Tripthi
Hamburger, Max I.
Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs after Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents for rheumatoid arthritis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-014-0002-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bergmanmartinj responsetobiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsafterdiscontinuationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT elkinericp responsetobiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsafterdiscontinuationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT ogalesarika responsetobiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsafterdiscontinuationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT kamathtripthi responsetobiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsafterdiscontinuationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT hamburgermaxi responsetobiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsafterdiscontinuationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsforrheumatoidarthritis