Cargando…

Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear

PURPOSE: To determine if the use of pigments or adding polyvinyl pyrrolidone during the fabrication of 1-DAY ACUVUE DEFINE (AD) brand contact lenses impacts open-eye corneal swelling compared with no lens wear (NLW). METHODS: A partial double-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study was conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moezzi, Amir M., Varikooty, Jalaiah, Schulze, Marc, Ngo, William, Lorenz, Kathrine Osborn, Boree, Danielle, Jones, Lyndon W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26945176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000840
_version_ 1782434281928261632
author Moezzi, Amir M.
Varikooty, Jalaiah
Schulze, Marc
Ngo, William
Lorenz, Kathrine Osborn
Boree, Danielle
Jones, Lyndon W.
author_facet Moezzi, Amir M.
Varikooty, Jalaiah
Schulze, Marc
Ngo, William
Lorenz, Kathrine Osborn
Boree, Danielle
Jones, Lyndon W.
author_sort Moezzi, Amir M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if the use of pigments or adding polyvinyl pyrrolidone during the fabrication of 1-DAY ACUVUE DEFINE (AD) brand contact lenses impacts open-eye corneal swelling compared with no lens wear (NLW). METHODS: A partial double-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study was conducted in 24 Asian subjects using AD, 1-DAY ACUVUE DEFINE with Lacreon (ADL), NLW, and a control lens with no tint (1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST [AM]). Central corneal thickness was measured before insertion and immediately after removal after 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear using an optical pachymeter in one eye. Corneal thickness along a 10-mm cord was measured in the contralateral eye using the Visante optical coherence tomographer (OCT). Corneal swelling was tested for noninferiority using a 5% margin. The endothelial bleb response was measured at baseline and 20 min after lens insertion using specular microscopy. Subjective grading of corneal staining and limbal/bulbar hyperemia were also monitored. RESULTS: After 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear, central corneal swelling across the study lenses with either optical pachymeter or OCT methods was negligible. Peripheral corneal swelling least-square mean differences with OCT were −0.03% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], −0.65 to 0.58%) and −0.26% (95% CI, −0.87 to 0.36%) between AD and ADL and the control lens (AM), respectively, and 1.67% (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.29%) and 1.45% (95% CI, 0.84 to 2.06%) between AD and ADL and NLW, respectively. No endothelial blebs were observed. No clinically significant differences were distinguished between the lenses and NLW for corneal staining and limbal/bulbar hyperemia. CONCLUSIONS: After 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear, central and peripheral corneal swelling along the horizontal meridian with AD, ADL, AM, and NLW were equivalent. These results confirm that the addition of polyvinyl pyrrolidone or pigments to etafilcon A to obtain a limbal ring design have no impact on corneal swelling or limbal/bulbar hyperemia during normal open-eye wear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4883641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48836412016-06-15 Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear Moezzi, Amir M. Varikooty, Jalaiah Schulze, Marc Ngo, William Lorenz, Kathrine Osborn Boree, Danielle Jones, Lyndon W. Optom Vis Sci Original Articles PURPOSE: To determine if the use of pigments or adding polyvinyl pyrrolidone during the fabrication of 1-DAY ACUVUE DEFINE (AD) brand contact lenses impacts open-eye corneal swelling compared with no lens wear (NLW). METHODS: A partial double-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study was conducted in 24 Asian subjects using AD, 1-DAY ACUVUE DEFINE with Lacreon (ADL), NLW, and a control lens with no tint (1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST [AM]). Central corneal thickness was measured before insertion and immediately after removal after 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear using an optical pachymeter in one eye. Corneal thickness along a 10-mm cord was measured in the contralateral eye using the Visante optical coherence tomographer (OCT). Corneal swelling was tested for noninferiority using a 5% margin. The endothelial bleb response was measured at baseline and 20 min after lens insertion using specular microscopy. Subjective grading of corneal staining and limbal/bulbar hyperemia were also monitored. RESULTS: After 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear, central corneal swelling across the study lenses with either optical pachymeter or OCT methods was negligible. Peripheral corneal swelling least-square mean differences with OCT were −0.03% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], −0.65 to 0.58%) and −0.26% (95% CI, −0.87 to 0.36%) between AD and ADL and the control lens (AM), respectively, and 1.67% (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.29%) and 1.45% (95% CI, 0.84 to 2.06%) between AD and ADL and NLW, respectively. No endothelial blebs were observed. No clinically significant differences were distinguished between the lenses and NLW for corneal staining and limbal/bulbar hyperemia. CONCLUSIONS: After 8 ± 1 h of open-eye wear, central and peripheral corneal swelling along the horizontal meridian with AD, ADL, AM, and NLW were equivalent. These results confirm that the addition of polyvinyl pyrrolidone or pigments to etafilcon A to obtain a limbal ring design have no impact on corneal swelling or limbal/bulbar hyperemia during normal open-eye wear. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-06 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4883641/ /pubmed/26945176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000840 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Optometry This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Moezzi, Amir M.
Varikooty, Jalaiah
Schulze, Marc
Ngo, William
Lorenz, Kathrine Osborn
Boree, Danielle
Jones, Lyndon W.
Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title_full Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title_fullStr Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title_short Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear
title_sort corneal swelling with cosmetic etafilcon a lenses versus no lens wear
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4883641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26945176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000840
work_keys_str_mv AT moezziamirm cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT varikootyjalaiah cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT schulzemarc cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT ngowilliam cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT lorenzkathrineosborn cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT boreedanielle cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear
AT joneslyndonw cornealswellingwithcosmeticetafilconalensesversusnolenswear