Cargando…

Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments

The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameron, Tom C., O'Sullivan, Daniel, Reynolds, Alan, Hicks, Joseph P., Piertney, Stuart B., Benton, Tim G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
_version_ 1782434338204286976
author Cameron, Tom C.
O'Sullivan, Daniel
Reynolds, Alan
Hicks, Joseph P.
Piertney, Stuart B.
Benton, Tim G.
author_facet Cameron, Tom C.
O'Sullivan, Daniel
Reynolds, Alan
Hicks, Joseph P.
Piertney, Stuart B.
Benton, Tim G.
author_sort Cameron, Tom C.
collection PubMed
description The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage‐structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4884197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48841972016-08-11 Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments Cameron, Tom C. O'Sullivan, Daniel Reynolds, Alan Hicks, Joseph P. Piertney, Stuart B. Benton, Tim G. Ecol Evol Original Research The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage‐structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4884197/ /pubmed/27516873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cameron, Tom C.
O'Sullivan, Daniel
Reynolds, Alan
Hicks, Joseph P.
Piertney, Stuart B.
Benton, Tim G.
Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title_full Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title_fullStr Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title_full_unstemmed Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title_short Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
title_sort harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
work_keys_str_mv AT camerontomc harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments
AT osullivandaniel harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments
AT reynoldsalan harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments
AT hicksjosephp harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments
AT piertneystuartb harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments
AT bentontimg harvestedpopulationsaremorevariableonlyinmorevariableenvironments