Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy
BACKGROUND: Trinity Evolution® cellular bone allograft (TE) possesses the osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive elements essential for bone healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes when TE is used as a graft extender in combination with local...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27233773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0392-z |
_version_ | 1782434376526594048 |
---|---|
author | Musante, David B. Firtha, Michael E. Atkinson, Brent L. Hahn, Rebekah Ryaby, James T. Linovitz, Raymond J. |
author_facet | Musante, David B. Firtha, Michael E. Atkinson, Brent L. Hahn, Rebekah Ryaby, James T. Linovitz, Raymond J. |
author_sort | Musante, David B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trinity Evolution® cellular bone allograft (TE) possesses the osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive elements essential for bone healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes when TE is used as a graft extender in combination with locally derived bone in one- and two-level instrumented lumbar posterolateral arthrodeses. METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation, a consecutive series of subject charts that had posterolateral arthrodesis with TE and a 12-month radiographic follow-up were evaluated. All subjects were diagnosed with degenerative disc disease, radiculopathy, stenosis, and decreased disc height. At 2 weeks and at 3 and 12 months, plain radiographs were performed and the subject’s back and leg pain (VAS) was recorded. An evaluation of fusion status was performed at 12 months. RESULTS: The population consisted of 43 subjects and 47 arthrodeses. At 12 months, a fusion rate of 90.7 % of subjects and 89.4 % of surgical levels was observed. High-risk subjects (e.g., diabetes, tobacco use, etc.) had fusion rates comparable to normal patients. Compared with the preoperative leg or back pain level, the postoperative pain levels were significantly (p < 0.0001) improved at every time point. There were no adverse events attributable to TE. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion rates using TE were higher than or comparable to fusion rates with autologous iliac crest bone graft that have been reported in the recent literature for posterolateral fusion procedures, and TE fusion rates were not adversely affected by several high-risk patient factors. The positive results provide confidence that TE can safely replace autologous iliac crest bone graft when used as a bone graft extender in combination with locally derived bone in the setting of posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in patients with or without risk factors for compromised bone healing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Because of the retrospective nature of this study, the trial was not registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4884431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48844312016-05-29 Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy Musante, David B. Firtha, Michael E. Atkinson, Brent L. Hahn, Rebekah Ryaby, James T. Linovitz, Raymond J. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Trinity Evolution® cellular bone allograft (TE) possesses the osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive elements essential for bone healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes when TE is used as a graft extender in combination with locally derived bone in one- and two-level instrumented lumbar posterolateral arthrodeses. METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation, a consecutive series of subject charts that had posterolateral arthrodesis with TE and a 12-month radiographic follow-up were evaluated. All subjects were diagnosed with degenerative disc disease, radiculopathy, stenosis, and decreased disc height. At 2 weeks and at 3 and 12 months, plain radiographs were performed and the subject’s back and leg pain (VAS) was recorded. An evaluation of fusion status was performed at 12 months. RESULTS: The population consisted of 43 subjects and 47 arthrodeses. At 12 months, a fusion rate of 90.7 % of subjects and 89.4 % of surgical levels was observed. High-risk subjects (e.g., diabetes, tobacco use, etc.) had fusion rates comparable to normal patients. Compared with the preoperative leg or back pain level, the postoperative pain levels were significantly (p < 0.0001) improved at every time point. There were no adverse events attributable to TE. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion rates using TE were higher than or comparable to fusion rates with autologous iliac crest bone graft that have been reported in the recent literature for posterolateral fusion procedures, and TE fusion rates were not adversely affected by several high-risk patient factors. The positive results provide confidence that TE can safely replace autologous iliac crest bone graft when used as a bone graft extender in combination with locally derived bone in the setting of posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in patients with or without risk factors for compromised bone healing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Because of the retrospective nature of this study, the trial was not registered. BioMed Central 2016-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4884431/ /pubmed/27233773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0392-z Text en © Musante et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Musante, David B. Firtha, Michael E. Atkinson, Brent L. Hahn, Rebekah Ryaby, James T. Linovitz, Raymond J. Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title | Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27233773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0392-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT musantedavidb clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy AT firthamichaele clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy AT atkinsonbrentl clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy AT hahnrebekah clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy AT ryabyjamest clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy AT linovitzraymondj clinicalevaluationofanallogeneicbonematrixcontainingviableosteogeniccellsinpatientsundergoingoneandtwolevelposterolaterallumbararthrodesiswithdecompressivelaminectomy |