Cargando…

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study

To assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with node-positive in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Data of patients were obtained from the SEER database from 1990 to 2012, and ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Juan, He, Zhen-Yu, Li, Feng-Yan, Sun, Jia-Yuan, Lin, Huan-Xin, Wu, San-Gang, Chen, Qiong-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788911
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6911
_version_ 1782434443493900288
author Zhou, Juan
He, Zhen-Yu
Li, Feng-Yan
Sun, Jia-Yuan
Lin, Huan-Xin
Wu, San-Gang
Chen, Qiong-Hua
author_facet Zhou, Juan
He, Zhen-Yu
Li, Feng-Yan
Sun, Jia-Yuan
Lin, Huan-Xin
Wu, San-Gang
Chen, Qiong-Hua
author_sort Zhou, Juan
collection PubMed
description To assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with node-positive in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Data of patients were obtained from the SEER database from 1990 to 2012, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox regression proportional hazard model. The prognostic value of the LNR on cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. A total of 5,926 patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed that the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs), the number of positive lymph nodes, and the LNR were significantly associated with CSS and OS (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis indicated that a higher LNR was an independent prognostic factor for poorer CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.896, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.709-2.104, P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.679, 95% CI: 1.454-1.939, P < 0.001). Among patients with LNR ≤ 0.42 and those with LNR > 0.42, the 5-year CSS was 53.1% and 34.7%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the 5-year OS was 50.4% and 32.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic value of the LNR persisted for patients after stratification by the numbers of RLNs, tumor histology, and tumor grade. LNR is a more accurate prognostic method for stage IIIC EOC patients. Patients with a higher LNR are associated with poorer survival in stage IIIC EOC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4884966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48849662016-06-17 Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study Zhou, Juan He, Zhen-Yu Li, Feng-Yan Sun, Jia-Yuan Lin, Huan-Xin Wu, San-Gang Chen, Qiong-Hua Oncotarget Research Paper To assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with node-positive in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Data of patients were obtained from the SEER database from 1990 to 2012, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox regression proportional hazard model. The prognostic value of the LNR on cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. A total of 5,926 patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed that the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs), the number of positive lymph nodes, and the LNR were significantly associated with CSS and OS (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis indicated that a higher LNR was an independent prognostic factor for poorer CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.896, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.709-2.104, P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.679, 95% CI: 1.454-1.939, P < 0.001). Among patients with LNR ≤ 0.42 and those with LNR > 0.42, the 5-year CSS was 53.1% and 34.7%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the 5-year OS was 50.4% and 32.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic value of the LNR persisted for patients after stratification by the numbers of RLNs, tumor histology, and tumor grade. LNR is a more accurate prognostic method for stage IIIC EOC patients. Patients with a higher LNR are associated with poorer survival in stage IIIC EOC. Impact Journals LLC 2016-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4884966/ /pubmed/26788911 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6911 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Zhou et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhou, Juan
He, Zhen-Yu
Li, Feng-Yan
Sun, Jia-Yuan
Lin, Huan-Xin
Wu, San-Gang
Chen, Qiong-Hua
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title_full Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title_fullStr Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title_short Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study
title_sort prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage iiic epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a seer population-based study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788911
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6911
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujuan prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT hezhenyu prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT lifengyan prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT sunjiayuan prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT linhuanxin prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT wusangang prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT chenqionghua prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiicepithelialovariancancerwithnodepositiveinaseerpopulationbasedstudy