Cargando…

A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Archit, Chauhan, Vijendra, Singh, Deepa, Shailendra, Raghuvanshi, Maheshwari, Rajesh, Juyal, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293283
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779
_version_ 1782434499061088256
author Agarwal, Archit
Chauhan, Vijendra
Singh, Deepa
Shailendra, Raghuvanshi
Maheshwari, Rajesh
Juyal, Anil
author_facet Agarwal, Archit
Chauhan, Vijendra
Singh, Deepa
Shailendra, Raghuvanshi
Maheshwari, Rajesh
Juyal, Anil
author_sort Agarwal, Archit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle screw placement utilizes anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the accuracy of freehand and image-assisted technique to place pedicle screws in the dorsolumbar spine of cadavers by an experienced surgeon and a resident. Evaluation was done using dissection of pedicle and computed tomography (CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric dorsolumbar spines were exposed by a posterior approach. Titanium pedicle screws were inserted from D5 to L5 vertebrae by freehand and image-assisted technique on either side by an experienced surgeon and a resident. CT was obtained. A blinded radiologist reviewed the imaging. The spines were then dissected to do a macroscopic examination. Screws, having evidence of cortical perforation of more than 2 mm on CT, were considered to be a significant breach. RESULTS: A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The surgeon and the resident placed 130 screws each. Out of 130 screws, both of them placed 65 screws each by freehand and image- assisted technique each. The resident had a rate of 7.69% significant medial and 10.76% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 9.23% significant lateral breach. The expert surgeon had a rate of 6.15% significant medial and 1.53% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 6.15% significant lateral breach on CT evaluation. CONCLUSION: Freehand technique is as good as the image-assisted technique. Under appropriate supervision, residents can safely learn to place freehand pedicle screws with an acceptable violation rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48852912016-06-10 A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study Agarwal, Archit Chauhan, Vijendra Singh, Deepa Shailendra, Raghuvanshi Maheshwari, Rajesh Juyal, Anil Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle screw placement utilizes anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the accuracy of freehand and image-assisted technique to place pedicle screws in the dorsolumbar spine of cadavers by an experienced surgeon and a resident. Evaluation was done using dissection of pedicle and computed tomography (CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric dorsolumbar spines were exposed by a posterior approach. Titanium pedicle screws were inserted from D5 to L5 vertebrae by freehand and image-assisted technique on either side by an experienced surgeon and a resident. CT was obtained. A blinded radiologist reviewed the imaging. The spines were then dissected to do a macroscopic examination. Screws, having evidence of cortical perforation of more than 2 mm on CT, were considered to be a significant breach. RESULTS: A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The surgeon and the resident placed 130 screws each. Out of 130 screws, both of them placed 65 screws each by freehand and image- assisted technique each. The resident had a rate of 7.69% significant medial and 10.76% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 9.23% significant lateral breach. The expert surgeon had a rate of 6.15% significant medial and 1.53% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 6.15% significant lateral breach on CT evaluation. CONCLUSION: Freehand technique is as good as the image-assisted technique. Under appropriate supervision, residents can safely learn to place freehand pedicle screws with an acceptable violation rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4885291/ /pubmed/27293283 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, Archit
Chauhan, Vijendra
Singh, Deepa
Shailendra, Raghuvanshi
Maheshwari, Rajesh
Juyal, Anil
A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title_full A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title_fullStr A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title_short A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
title_sort comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: a cadaveric study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293283
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalarchit acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT chauhanvijendra acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT singhdeepa acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT shailendraraghuvanshi acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT maheshwarirajesh acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT juyalanil acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT agarwalarchit comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT chauhanvijendra comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT singhdeepa comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT shailendraraghuvanshi comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT maheshwarirajesh comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT juyalanil comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy