Cargando…
A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293283 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779 |
_version_ | 1782434499061088256 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Archit Chauhan, Vijendra Singh, Deepa Shailendra, Raghuvanshi Maheshwari, Rajesh Juyal, Anil |
author_facet | Agarwal, Archit Chauhan, Vijendra Singh, Deepa Shailendra, Raghuvanshi Maheshwari, Rajesh Juyal, Anil |
author_sort | Agarwal, Archit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle screw placement utilizes anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the accuracy of freehand and image-assisted technique to place pedicle screws in the dorsolumbar spine of cadavers by an experienced surgeon and a resident. Evaluation was done using dissection of pedicle and computed tomography (CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric dorsolumbar spines were exposed by a posterior approach. Titanium pedicle screws were inserted from D5 to L5 vertebrae by freehand and image-assisted technique on either side by an experienced surgeon and a resident. CT was obtained. A blinded radiologist reviewed the imaging. The spines were then dissected to do a macroscopic examination. Screws, having evidence of cortical perforation of more than 2 mm on CT, were considered to be a significant breach. RESULTS: A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The surgeon and the resident placed 130 screws each. Out of 130 screws, both of them placed 65 screws each by freehand and image- assisted technique each. The resident had a rate of 7.69% significant medial and 10.76% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 9.23% significant lateral breach. The expert surgeon had a rate of 6.15% significant medial and 1.53% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 6.15% significant lateral breach on CT evaluation. CONCLUSION: Freehand technique is as good as the image-assisted technique. Under appropriate supervision, residents can safely learn to place freehand pedicle screws with an acceptable violation rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4885291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48852912016-06-10 A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study Agarwal, Archit Chauhan, Vijendra Singh, Deepa Shailendra, Raghuvanshi Maheshwari, Rajesh Juyal, Anil Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle screw placement utilizes anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the accuracy of freehand and image-assisted technique to place pedicle screws in the dorsolumbar spine of cadavers by an experienced surgeon and a resident. Evaluation was done using dissection of pedicle and computed tomography (CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric dorsolumbar spines were exposed by a posterior approach. Titanium pedicle screws were inserted from D5 to L5 vertebrae by freehand and image-assisted technique on either side by an experienced surgeon and a resident. CT was obtained. A blinded radiologist reviewed the imaging. The spines were then dissected to do a macroscopic examination. Screws, having evidence of cortical perforation of more than 2 mm on CT, were considered to be a significant breach. RESULTS: A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The surgeon and the resident placed 130 screws each. Out of 130 screws, both of them placed 65 screws each by freehand and image- assisted technique each. The resident had a rate of 7.69% significant medial and 10.76% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 9.23% significant lateral breach. The expert surgeon had a rate of 6.15% significant medial and 1.53% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 6.15% significant lateral breach on CT evaluation. CONCLUSION: Freehand technique is as good as the image-assisted technique. Under appropriate supervision, residents can safely learn to place freehand pedicle screws with an acceptable violation rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4885291/ /pubmed/27293283 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Agarwal, Archit Chauhan, Vijendra Singh, Deepa Shailendra, Raghuvanshi Maheshwari, Rajesh Juyal, Anil A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title | A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title_full | A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title_short | A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study |
title_sort | comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: a cadaveric study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293283 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalarchit acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT chauhanvijendra acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT singhdeepa acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT shailendraraghuvanshi acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT maheshwarirajesh acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT juyalanil acomparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT agarwalarchit comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT chauhanvijendra comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT singhdeepa comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT shailendraraghuvanshi comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT maheshwarirajesh comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy AT juyalanil comparativestudyofpediclescrewfixationindorsolumbarspinebyfreehandversusimageassistedtechniqueacadavericstudy |