Cargando…
Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661 |
_version_ | 1782434505000222720 |
---|---|
author | Orkin, Chloe Jeffery-Smith, Anna Foster, Graham R Tong, C Y William |
author_facet | Orkin, Chloe Jeffery-Smith, Anna Foster, Graham R Tong, C Y William |
author_sort | Orkin, Chloe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during an unlinked study of the emergency department at 1 of these hospitals. DESIGN: 1000 stored residual samples were tested for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and reactive samples were further tested for HCV RNA. The study was reviewed by the East Midland NRES ethics committee project ID 181154, approval number 15/WS/0125. RESULTS: The anti-HCV reactivity rate was 0.5% (5/1000) with 0.1% (1/1000) confirmed viraemic. Prevalence for the other blood-borne viruses was higher: 1% (10/1000) were hepatitis B surface antigen positive and 0.3% were HIV antigen/antibody positive (3/1000). There were no co-infections. CONCLUSIONS: More data to establish the prevalence of HCV in the antenatal population is needed. The addition of anti-HCV testing to the well-established antenatal screening programme provides a unique opportunity to impact on the health of pregnant women, their children, partners and future pregnancies in this new era of treatment for hepatitis C. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4885317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48853172016-06-01 Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? Orkin, Chloe Jeffery-Smith, Anna Foster, Graham R Tong, C Y William BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during an unlinked study of the emergency department at 1 of these hospitals. DESIGN: 1000 stored residual samples were tested for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and reactive samples were further tested for HCV RNA. The study was reviewed by the East Midland NRES ethics committee project ID 181154, approval number 15/WS/0125. RESULTS: The anti-HCV reactivity rate was 0.5% (5/1000) with 0.1% (1/1000) confirmed viraemic. Prevalence for the other blood-borne viruses was higher: 1% (10/1000) were hepatitis B surface antigen positive and 0.3% were HIV antigen/antibody positive (3/1000). There were no co-infections. CONCLUSIONS: More data to establish the prevalence of HCV in the antenatal population is needed. The addition of anti-HCV testing to the well-established antenatal screening programme provides a unique opportunity to impact on the health of pregnant women, their children, partners and future pregnancies in this new era of treatment for hepatitis C. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4885317/ /pubmed/27231001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Orkin, Chloe Jeffery-Smith, Anna Foster, Graham R Tong, C Y William Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title | Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title_full | Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title_fullStr | Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title_short | Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
title_sort | retrospective hepatitis c seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orkinchloe retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen AT jefferysmithanna retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen AT fostergrahamr retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen AT tongcywilliam retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen |