Cargando…

Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?

OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orkin, Chloe, Jeffery-Smith, Anna, Foster, Graham R, Tong, C Y William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661
_version_ 1782434505000222720
author Orkin, Chloe
Jeffery-Smith, Anna
Foster, Graham R
Tong, C Y William
author_facet Orkin, Chloe
Jeffery-Smith, Anna
Foster, Graham R
Tong, C Y William
author_sort Orkin, Chloe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during an unlinked study of the emergency department at 1 of these hospitals. DESIGN: 1000 stored residual samples were tested for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and reactive samples were further tested for HCV RNA. The study was reviewed by the East Midland NRES ethics committee project ID 181154, approval number 15/WS/0125. RESULTS: The anti-HCV reactivity rate was 0.5% (5/1000) with 0.1% (1/1000) confirmed viraemic. Prevalence for the other blood-borne viruses was higher: 1% (10/1000) were hepatitis B surface antigen positive and 0.3% were HIV antigen/antibody positive (3/1000). There were no co-infections. CONCLUSIONS: More data to establish the prevalence of HCV in the antenatal population is needed. The addition of anti-HCV testing to the well-established antenatal screening programme provides a unique opportunity to impact on the health of pregnant women, their children, partners and future pregnancies in this new era of treatment for hepatitis C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48853172016-06-01 Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women? Orkin, Chloe Jeffery-Smith, Anna Foster, Graham R Tong, C Y William BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: An unlinked anonymous seroprevalence study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in samples derived from antenatal clinic attendees at 2 East London Hospitals. An unexpectedly high HCV seroprevalence of 2.6% (1.2% viraemic) had been revealed during an unlinked study of the emergency department at 1 of these hospitals. DESIGN: 1000 stored residual samples were tested for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and reactive samples were further tested for HCV RNA. The study was reviewed by the East Midland NRES ethics committee project ID 181154, approval number 15/WS/0125. RESULTS: The anti-HCV reactivity rate was 0.5% (5/1000) with 0.1% (1/1000) confirmed viraemic. Prevalence for the other blood-borne viruses was higher: 1% (10/1000) were hepatitis B surface antigen positive and 0.3% were HIV antigen/antibody positive (3/1000). There were no co-infections. CONCLUSIONS: More data to establish the prevalence of HCV in the antenatal population is needed. The addition of anti-HCV testing to the well-established antenatal screening programme provides a unique opportunity to impact on the health of pregnant women, their children, partners and future pregnancies in this new era of treatment for hepatitis C. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4885317/ /pubmed/27231001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Orkin, Chloe
Jeffery-Smith, Anna
Foster, Graham R
Tong, C Y William
Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title_full Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title_fullStr Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title_short Retrospective hepatitis C seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
title_sort retrospective hepatitis c seroprevalence screening in the antenatal setting—should we be screening antenatal women?
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010661
work_keys_str_mv AT orkinchloe retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen
AT jefferysmithanna retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen
AT fostergrahamr retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen
AT tongcywilliam retrospectivehepatitiscseroprevalencescreeningintheantenatalsettingshouldwebescreeningantenatalwomen