Cargando…
Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology
INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality researc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780 |
_version_ | 1782434508421726208 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Patricia Evaniew, Nathan Rendon, Juan Sebastian McKay, Paula Randall, R Lor Turcotte, Robert Vélez, Roberto Bhandari, Mohit Ghert, Michelle |
author_facet | Schneider, Patricia Evaniew, Nathan Rendon, Juan Sebastian McKay, Paula Randall, R Lor Turcotte, Robert Vélez, Roberto Bhandari, Mohit Ghert, Michelle |
author_sort | Schneider, Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4885431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48854312016-06-01 Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology Schneider, Patricia Evaniew, Nathan Rendon, Juan Sebastian McKay, Paula Randall, R Lor Turcotte, Robert Vélez, Roberto Bhandari, Mohit Ghert, Michelle BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4885431/ /pubmed/27221129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Schneider, Patricia Evaniew, Nathan Rendon, Juan Sebastian McKay, Paula Randall, R Lor Turcotte, Robert Vélez, Roberto Bhandari, Mohit Ghert, Michelle Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title | Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title_full | Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title_fullStr | Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title_short | Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
title_sort | moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderpatricia movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT evaniewnathan movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT rendonjuansebastian movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT mckaypaula movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT randallrlor movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT turcotterobert movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT velezroberto movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT bhandarimohit movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology AT ghertmichelle movingforwardthroughconsensusprotocolforamodifieddelphiapproachtodeterminethetopresearchprioritiesinthefieldoforthopaediconcology |