Cargando…

Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: To explore reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial and understand how these may contribute to recruitment of non-representative research samples. We also aimed to elicit non-participants’ own recommendations for enhancing trial uptake in primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attwood, S, Morton, K L, Mitchell, J, Van Emmenis, M, Sutton, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011577
_version_ 1782434509540556800
author Attwood, S
Morton, K L
Mitchell, J
Van Emmenis, M
Sutton, S
author_facet Attwood, S
Morton, K L
Mitchell, J
Van Emmenis, M
Sutton, S
author_sort Attwood, S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial and understand how these may contribute to recruitment of non-representative research samples. We also aimed to elicit non-participants’ own recommendations for enhancing trial uptake in primary care. DESIGN: Semistructured telephone interviews with non-participants to a randomised controlled trial of a very brief intervention for promoting physical activity conducted in primary care (the Very Brief Interventions trial), with thematic analysis of interview transcripts. SETTING: 5 general practice (GP) surgeries in the East of England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Interviews were completed with 10 female and 6 male non-participants of white ethnicity and aged between 40 and 71 years. 13 of the 16 interviewees were either active or moderately active according to the GP Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ). RESULTS: Interviewees discussed a range of reasons for non-participation. These included beliefs surrounding the personal relevance of the trial based on preconceptions of intervention content. Many interviewees considered themselves either sufficiently active or too functionally limited to increase activity levels further, so rendering participation pointless in their view. Other identified barriers included a lack of free time, for trial participation and for increasing physical activity, and dissatisfaction with appointment scheduling systems in place at GP surgeries. Interviewees questioned the appropriateness of primary care as a context for delivering interventions to promote physical activity. In general, interviewees were positively disposed towards the idea of trial participation, especially if personal benefits are made salient, but suggested that interventions could be delivered in a different setting such as the internet. CONCLUSIONS: To increase participation in physical activity promotion trials conducted in primary care, the content of invitation materials and procedures for contacting potential participants require reconsideration. Specific recommendations include streamlining intervention materials and enhancing their relevance to the health concerns of invitees. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72691150; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48854362016-06-01 Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study Attwood, S Morton, K L Mitchell, J Van Emmenis, M Sutton, S BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To explore reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial and understand how these may contribute to recruitment of non-representative research samples. We also aimed to elicit non-participants’ own recommendations for enhancing trial uptake in primary care. DESIGN: Semistructured telephone interviews with non-participants to a randomised controlled trial of a very brief intervention for promoting physical activity conducted in primary care (the Very Brief Interventions trial), with thematic analysis of interview transcripts. SETTING: 5 general practice (GP) surgeries in the East of England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Interviews were completed with 10 female and 6 male non-participants of white ethnicity and aged between 40 and 71 years. 13 of the 16 interviewees were either active or moderately active according to the GP Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ). RESULTS: Interviewees discussed a range of reasons for non-participation. These included beliefs surrounding the personal relevance of the trial based on preconceptions of intervention content. Many interviewees considered themselves either sufficiently active or too functionally limited to increase activity levels further, so rendering participation pointless in their view. Other identified barriers included a lack of free time, for trial participation and for increasing physical activity, and dissatisfaction with appointment scheduling systems in place at GP surgeries. Interviewees questioned the appropriateness of primary care as a context for delivering interventions to promote physical activity. In general, interviewees were positively disposed towards the idea of trial participation, especially if personal benefits are made salient, but suggested that interventions could be delivered in a different setting such as the internet. CONCLUSIONS: To increase participation in physical activity promotion trials conducted in primary care, the content of invitation materials and procedures for contacting potential participants require reconsideration. Specific recommendations include streamlining intervention materials and enhancing their relevance to the health concerns of invitees. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72691150; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4885436/ /pubmed/27217288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011577 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Attwood, S
Morton, K L
Mitchell, J
Van Emmenis, M
Sutton, S
Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title_full Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title_short Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
title_sort reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011577
work_keys_str_mv AT attwoods reasonsfornonparticipationinaprimarycarebasedphysicalactivitytrialaqualitativestudy
AT mortonkl reasonsfornonparticipationinaprimarycarebasedphysicalactivitytrialaqualitativestudy
AT mitchellj reasonsfornonparticipationinaprimarycarebasedphysicalactivitytrialaqualitativestudy
AT vanemmenism reasonsfornonparticipationinaprimarycarebasedphysicalactivitytrialaqualitativestudy
AT suttons reasonsfornonparticipationinaprimarycarebasedphysicalactivitytrialaqualitativestudy